Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Travel Demand Management and the Big Scare: Impacts and Lessons on Travel in London During the 2012 Summer Olympic Games

Abstract

This paper presents an independent review of the travel demand management (TDM) program for the London 2012 Summer Olympic Games, including the official TDM plan and a discussion of the undocumented but highly influential aspects of the “big scare” effect. The games were some of the largest planned in history, with more than 20 million additional trips expected in a city renowned for significant daily travel congestion. The network of Olympic lanes was the largest ever (108 mi); a traffic lane was designated for exclusive use by Olympic vehicles over a large proportion of inner London's roads. The TDM program was the largest in history and cost £30 million for extensive advertising, travel planning for 611,000 employees, new trip planning web tools, and the transmission of 107 million travel advice e-mails. This program, along with a substantial transit development program, aimed to encourage public transit use and to reduce base load travel so as to increase the capacity for games-related travel. The TDM program warned Londoners to change their travel patterns during the games. This warning, a range of probably unplanned events, and media hysteria before the games acted to enhance the big scare effect of the games on travel. The impact of the games on travel was impressive. About 20 million (more than 30%) additional transit trips resulted. Road travel itself decreased by 10% to 30%. A 26% change in travel by London residents included a 20% reduction in travel and a 13% change in travel (i.e., retiming 6%, rerouting 4%, and remoding 3%). Significantly, media reporting was highly positive during the time that the games took place. Business surveys corroborated these findings: employee attendance decreased by 30%, and a strong preference was shown to reduce and retime commutes. Implications for policy and future research are identified in the paper.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Springett C. London 2012 Travel Demand Management. Proc., European Transport Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 2012.
2. London Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Ltd. Preparing Your Business for the Games. http://microsites.essex.gov.uk/microsites/essex_resilience/Documents/preparing-your-business-for-the-games.pdf. London, 2012.
3. Currie G., and Shalaby A. Synthesis of Transport Planning Approaches for the World's Largest Events. Transport Reviews, 2011, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2012, pp. 113–136.
4. Currie G., and Delbosc A. Assessing Travel Demand Management for the Summer Olympic Games. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2245, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 36–48.
5. Comsis Corporation. Overview of Travel Demand Management Measures. Final Report. DOT-T-94-11. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
6. Sumner H. Delivering London 2012: Transport Legacy. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Transport, Vol. 165, No. 4, 2012, pp. 267–275.
7. Kassens-Noor E. Planning Olympic Legacies: Transport Dreams and Urban Realities. Routledge, New York, 2012.
8. Transport for London. London 2012 Games Transport: Performance, Funding and Legacy. London, 2012.
9. Bates I., Cuckson C., Brownbridge N., and Thellmann A. Games Family Demand Modelling for London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Association for European Transport and Contributors. Proc., European Transport Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 2012.
10. Kershaw S. Delivering London 2012: Transport Programme Assurance. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, Vol. 165, No. 4, 2012, pp. 241–248.
11. Butcher L. London Olympics 2012: Transport. Library of the House of Commons, London, 2012.
12. Currie G. The Planning and Performance of Mass Transit Operating Strategies for Major Events: The Atlanta Olympic Games and the 1996 Melbourne Formula 1 Grand Prix. Proc., Australian Institute of Traffic Planning and Management Conference, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 1998.
13. Transport for London. Olympic Legacy Monitoring: Personal Travel Behaviour During the Games. Travel in London Supplementary Report. Mayor of London, London, 2013.
14. Transport for London. Submission to the London Assembly Transport Committee. Review of the Operation of London's Transport System During the 2012 Games and the Transport Legacy. London Assembly, Transport Committee, London, 2012.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graham Currie
Public Transport Research Group, Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Building 60, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Adam Jones
School of Sport and Service Management, University of Brighton, Denton Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN20 7SR, United Kingdom.
Janet Woolley
School of Sport and Service Management, University of Brighton, Denton Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN20 7SR, United Kingdom.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 225

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Travel demand management policies: A case study of Singapore and trans...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Public Transportation and Social Movements: Learning from the Hong Kon...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Event sustainability and sustainable transportation: a positive recipr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Testing hot‐spots police patrols against no‐treatment controls: Tempor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The role of businesses in facilitating voluntary travel behaviour chan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Event sustainability and transportation policy: A model-based cluster ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub