Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Risk-Taking Behavior of Left-Turners in Gap Acceptance and Its Effects on Capacity Estimation at Signalized Intersections

Abstract

The capacity of signalized intersections with a permissive left-turn phase is influenced significantly by the gap acceptance of left-turners. Left-turners' perception of risk when they are deciding whether to accept a gap is of great importance for understanding such driver behavior and for developing countermeasures to improve intersections. This study's objective was thus to model the tradeoff relationship between the perceived risk and the time-saving benefit in gap acceptance for left-turners in China. In the proposed model, the perceived risk was measured by the postencroachment time of the left-turning vehicle and of the gap-ending through vehicle at the conflict; the time-saving benefit was indicated by the potential time to wait for the next acceptable gap. A gap acceptance model that incorporated both variables was then developed and validated by using data collected at two intersections in Shanghai. The acceptable risk level of left-turners could then be defined as the ratio of the estimated model coefficients of those two variables. Results indicated that the wait time significantly affected the gap acceptance and the critical gap decreased as the acceptable risk level rose. In addition, the acceptable risk level was found to be approximately 60 at the observed intersections. With the results, impacts of the acceptable risk level on the capacity of permissive left-turn traffic were investigated through a numerical study. The findings revealed that the capacity of permissive left-turn traffic could be stochastic in nature rather than constant because of random traffic flow characteristics as well as different risk perceptions of drivers.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Choi E. H. Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective. DOT-HS-811-366. NHTSA, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
2. Pan F. Q., Lu J., and Xiang Q. J. Level of Safety Service for Highway Signalized Intersections. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 3, No. 2, 2008, pp. 298–303.
3. Chan C. Y. Characterization of Driving Behaviors Based on Field Observation of Intersection Left-Turn Across-Path Scenarios. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2006, pp. 322–331.
4. Cooper P. J., and Zheng Y. Turning Gap Acceptance Decision-Making: The Impact of Driver Distraction. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2002, pp. 321–335.
5. Leung S., and Starmer G. Gap Acceptance and Risk-Taking by Young and Mature Drivers, Both Sober and Alcohol-Intoxicated in a Simulated Driving Task. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1056–1065.
6. Yan X., and Radwan E. Influence of Restricted Sight Distances on Permitted Left-Turn Operation at Signalized Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 2, 2008, pp. 68–76.
7. Llorca C., García A., Perez Zuriaga A. M., and Moreno A. T. New Experimental Approach for Passing Gap Acceptance. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
8. Adebisi O., and Sama G. N. Influence of Stopped Delay on Driver Gap Acceptance Behavior. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 3, 1989, pp. 305–315.
9. Mahmassani H., and Sheffi Y. Using Gap Sequences to Estimate Gap Acceptance Functions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1981, pp. 143–148.
10. Raff M. S., and Hart J. W. A Volume Warrant for Urban Stop Signs. Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control, Saugatuck, Conn., 1950.
11. Gattis J. L., and Low S. T. Gap Acceptance at Atypical Stop-Controlled Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1999, pp. 201–207.
12. Miller A. J. Nine Estimators of Gap-Acceptance Parameters. Proc., International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, 1972, pp. 215–235.
13. Cassidy M. J., Madanat S. M., Wang M.-H., and Yang F. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity and Level of Service: Revisiting Critical Gap. In Transportation Research Record 1484, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 16–23.
14. Polus A., Shiftan Y., and Shmueli-Lazar S. Evaluation of the Waiting-Time Effect on Critical Gaps at Roundabouts by a Logit Model. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1–12.
15. Devarasetty P. C., Zhang Y., and Fitzpatrick K. Differentiating Between Left-Turn Gap and Lag Acceptance at Unsignalized Intersections as a Function of the Site Characteristics. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 5, 2011, pp. 580–588.
16. Zhang L., and Prevedouros P. D. Signalized Intersection Level of Service Incorporating Safety Risk. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1852, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 77–86.
17. Lee J.-T., Kweon Y.-J., and Dittberner R. Permissive Left-Turn Right-Angle Crashes at Protective-Permissive Five-Section Signal Heads. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
18. Peesapati L. N., Hunter M. P., and Rodgers M. O. Evaluation of Post-encroachment Time as Surrogate for Opposing Left-Turn Crashes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2386, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 42–51.
19. Adams J. Risk. University College of London Press, London, 1995.
20. Pollatschek M. A., Polus A., and Livneh M. A Decision Model for Gap Acceptance and Capacity at Intersections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2002, pp. 649–663.
21. Wilde J. S. G. Target Risk. PDE Publications, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1990.
22. Hamdar S. H., Treiber M., Mahmassani H. S., and Kesting A. Modeling Driving Behavior as Sequential Risk-Taking Task. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2088, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 208–217.
23. Gettman D., and Head L. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. FHWA-RD-03-050. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
24. Daniel L., and Andre S. Use of Poisson Distribution in Highway Traffic. Columbia University Press, New York, 1955.
25. Tang K., Dong S., Wang F., Ni Y., and Sun J. Behavior of Riders of Electric Bicycles at Onset of Green and Yellow at Signalized Intersections in China. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2317, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 85–96.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Keshuang Tang
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Department of Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Cao'an Road, No. 4800, Shanghai 201804, China.
Deshi Di
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Department of Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Cao'an Road, No. 4800, Shanghai 201804, China.
Keping Li
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Department of Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Cao'an Road, No. 4800, Shanghai 201804, China.

Notes

The Standing Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 36

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Unprotected Left-Turn Behavior Model Capturing Path Variations at Inte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub