Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Methodology to Compute Travel Time of a Roundabout Corridor

Abstract

Urban and suburban arterials with roundabouts in series are becoming more prevalent in North America. While the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides a methodology for computing segment travel time of urban streets with various forms of intersection control, the manual does not provide a similar procedure for corridors with interdependent roundabouts. Such a methodology is necessary to evaluate performance of roundabout corridors and will allow the practitioner to compare both roundabout and signalized treatments for the same series of intersections. This paper presents a series of models intended to predict arterial travel time for a corridor with roundabouts, including a model for free-flow speed (FFS), a model to predict the length of the roundabout influence area (RIA, the area where geometric delay has incurred), a model for geometric delay, and models for impeded delay and average travel speed. These models were calibrated with data from seven roundabout corridors. The resulting models suggest that while FFS is a function of segment length, posted speed limit, and central island diameter, RIA length and geometric delay are functions of the FFS itself, as well as other geometric elements. The impeded delay and average travel speed are functions of traffic congestion and FFS. After validating the models with travel time data from two additional roundabout corridors not used in model development, the authors present a framework for incorporating the procedure for travel time prediction into the HCM analysis of urban streets.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Google Maps, 2014. http://maps.google.com. Accessed Jan. 18, 2014.
2. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
3. Rodegerdts L. A., Jenior P. M., Bugg Z. H., Ray B. L., Schroeder B. J., and Brewer M. A. NCHRP Report 772: Evaluating the Performance of Corridors with Roundabouts. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014.
4. Gross F., Lyon C., Persaud B., and Srinivasan R. Safety Effectiveness of Converting Signalized Intersections to Roundabouts. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
5. Rodegerdts L., Bansen J., Tiesler C., Knudsen J., Myers E., Johnson M., Moule M., Persaud B., Lyon C., Hallmark S., Isebrands H., Crown R. B., Guichet B., and O'Brien A. NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
6. Rodegerdts L., Blogg M., Wemple E., Myers E., Kyte M., Dixon M. P., List G. F., Flannery A., Troutbeck R., Brilon W., Wu N., Persaud B. N., Lyon C., Harkey D. L., and Carter D. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
7. Persaud B. N., Retting R. A., Garder P. E., and Lord D. Safety Effect of Roundabout Conversions in the United States: Empirical Bayes Observational Before–After Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1751, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 1–8.
8. Ariniello A. J. Are Roundabouts Good for Business? LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc., Dec. 2004. http://ci.golden.co.us/files/roundaboutpaper.pdf. Accessed June 2011.
9. Isebrands H., Hallmark S., Fitzsimmons E., and Stroda J. Toolbox to Evaluate the Impacts of Roundabouts on a Corridor or Roadway Network. Report MN/RC 2008-24. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2008.
10. Akçelik R. An Assessment of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Roundabout Capacity Model. Proc., 2011 Transportation Research Board International Roundabout Conference, Carmel, Ind., Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zachary Bugg
Kittelson and Associates, Inc., 36 South Charles Street, Suite 1920, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Bastian J. Schroeder
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Pete Jenior
Kittelson and Associates, Inc., 36 South Charles Street, Suite 1920, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Marcus Brewer
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 2935 Research Parkway, College Station, TX 77843-3135.
Lee Rodegerdts
Kittelson and Associates, Inc., 36 South Charles Street, Suite 1920, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Notes

The Standing Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 47

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Signal Control Method for Modern Roundabouts with Waiting Areas to Mee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Modelling of segment level travel time on urban roadway arterials usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Potential of Metering Roundabouts: Influence in Transportation Ext...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Assessing the impact of closely-spaced intersections on traffic operat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The effect of a roundabout corridor's design on selecting the optimal ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Identification of emission hotspots in roundabouts corridors
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub