Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Innovative Work Zone Capacity Models from Nationwide Field and Archival Sources

Abstract

Freeway work zone capacity has been the focus of significant research, but most studies were limited to specific geographic regions or work zone configurations or both. To date, no work zone predictive capacity model exists for U.S. freeways that is based on a geographically representative data set or sensitive to key geometric and operational attributes of the work zone. This paper proposes a new capacity model for freeway work zones, developed from nationwide field data fused with data obtained from an in-depth review of archived literature of prior work zone capacity studies in the United States. The proposed model estimates work zone capacity as a function of the lane closure severity index, barrier type, area type, lateral clearances, and daytime or nighttime work conditions. The model was successfully validated with 25% of the combined data that were not used for the model development. In addition, findings from literature archives suggested a 13.4% difference between prebreakdown, uninterrupted capacity and the ensuing queue discharge rate. The developed capacity model is intended to be incorporated into the next release of the Highway Capacity Manual and provides important insights on the relative effects of work zone configuration and other variables on the expected capacity of freeway work zones.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
2. Kim T., Lovell D. J., and Paracha J. A New Methodology to Estimate Capacity for Freeway Work Zones. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
3. Al-Kaisy A., Zhou M., and Hall F. New Insights into Freeway Capacity at Work Zones: Empirical Case Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1710, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 154–160.
4. Al-Kaisy A., and Hall F. Guidelines for Estimating Capacity at Freeway Reconstruction Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 5, 2003, pp. 572–577.
5. Sarasua W. A., Davis W. J., Clarke D. B., Kottapally J., and Mulukutla P. Evaluation of Interstate Highway Capacity for Short-Term Work Zone Lane Closures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1877, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 85–94.
6. Racha S., Chowdhury M., Sarasua W., and Ma Y. Analysis of Work Zone Traffic Behavior for Planning Applications. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2008, pp. 183–199.
7. Sarasua W. A., Davis W. J., Chowdhury M. A., and Ogle J. H. Estimating Interstate Highway Capacity for Short-Term Work Zone Lane Closures: Development of Methodology. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1948, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 45–57.
8. Sarasua W. A., Clarke D. B., and Davis W. J. Evaluation of Interstate Highway Capacity in Short-Term Work Zones. FHWA-SC-03-02. South Carolina Department of Transportation, Columbia, 2003.
9. Ramezani H., Benekohal R. F., and Avrenli K. A. Methodology to Measure Work Zone Capacity Using Field Data. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
10. Hicks C., Shaikh I., McCabe B., and Tighe S. Measuring Work Zone Capacity—Part 1. HIIFP-066. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada, 2009.
11. Hicks C., Shaikh I., McCabe B., and Tighe S. Measuring Work Zone Capacity—Part 2. HIIFP-067. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada, 2009.
12. Benekohal R. F., Kaja-Mohideen A., and Chitturi M. V. Evaluation of Construction Work Zone Operational Issues: Capacity, Queue, and Delay. ITRC FR 00/01-4, Illinois Transportation Research Center, Urbana, Ill., 2003.
13. Benekohal R. F., Kaja-Mohideen A.-Z., and Chitturi M. V. Methodology for Estimating Operating Speed and Capacity in Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1883, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 103–111.
14. Dudek C. L., and Richards S. H. Traffic Capacity Through Urban Freeway Work Zones in Texas. In Transportation Research Record 869, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 14–18.
15. Dixon K. K., Hummer J. E., and Lorscheider A. R. Capacity for North Carolina Freeway Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record 1529, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 27–34.
16. Dixon K. K. Capacity and Delay for North Carolina Freeway Work Zones. PhD dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1995.
17. Maze T. H., Schrock S. D., and Kamyab A. Capacity of Freeway Work Zone Lane Closures. Presented at Mid-Continent Transportation Symposium, Iowa State University, Ames, 2000, pp. 178–183.
18. Jiang Y. Traffic Characteristics and Estimation of Traffic Delays and User Costs at Indiana Freeway Work Zones. SPR-2121. Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette, 1999.
19. Jiang Y. Traffic Capacity, Speed, and Queue-Discharge Rate of Indiana's Four-Lane Freeway Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1657, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 10–17.
20. Bham G. H., Khazraee S. H. Missouri Work Zone Capacity: Results of Field Data Analysis. TPF-5-(081). Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, 2011.
21. Venugopal S., and Tarko A. Investigation of Factors Affecting Capacity at Rural Freeway Work Zones. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
22. Notbohm T., Drakopoulos A., and Dehman A. Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity. 08591, Smart Work Zone Development Initiative, Milwaukee, Wis., 2009.
23. Hu J., Schroeder B. J., and Rouphail N. M. Rationale for Incorporating Queue Discharge Flow into Highway Capacity Manual Procedure for Analysis of Freeway Facilities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2286, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 76–83.
24. Chitturi M. V., and Benekohal R. F. Effect of Lane Width on Speeds of Cars and Heavy Vehicles in Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1920, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 41–48.
25. Hair J. F. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2009.
26. Yuan Y. C. Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Concepts and New Development. Presented at SAS Global Forum 2010, SAS Global Users Group, Seattle, Wash., 2010.
27. Schwartz T., and Zeig-Owens R. Knowledge (of Your Missing Data) Is Power: Handling Missing Values in Your SAS Dataset. Presented at SAS Global Forum 2012, SAS Global Users Group, Orlando, Fla., 2012.
28. SAS Institute Inc. SAS 9.3. 2014.
29. Hajbabaie A., Yeom C., Rouphail N. M., Rasdorf W. J., and Schroeder B. J. Freeway Work Zone Free Flow Speed Prediction from Multi-State Sensor Data. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chunho Yeom
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Ali Hajbabaie
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, 101 Sloan Hall, 405 Spokane Street, P.O. Box 642910, Pullman, WA 99164.
Bastian J. Schroeder
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Christopher Vaughan
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Xingyu Xuan
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Nagui M. Rouphail
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695.

Notes

The opinions and conclusions stated in this paper are those of the authors and not of NCHRP or its sponsors.
The Standing Committee on Work Zone Traffic Control peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 84

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 12

  1. Effect of Construction Work Zone on Rear-End Conflicts by Vehicle Type...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Issues with work zone free flow speed computation in 6th edition HCM a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Survey of Work Zone Practices and Validation of Highway Capacity Manua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Review of Methods for Estimating Construction Work Zone Capacity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Development of Breakdown Probability Models and Heavy Vehicle Passenge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Estimating Uncertainty of Work Zone Capacity using Neural Network Mode...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Application of LiDAR and Connected Vehicle Data to Evaluate the Impact...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Validating the Performance of the FHWA Work Zone Model Version 1.0: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Simulation of Work Zones with Lane Closures in Proximity of Freeway In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Model for the capacity of the urban signal intersection with work zone
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Simulation Guidance for Calibration of Freeway Lane Closure Capacity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Capacity of Freeway Work Zones in Germany
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub