Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 28, 2019

Estimation of Base-Year Floor Space Data: Comparison of Census-Based and Lidar–Geographic Information System Approaches

Abstract

Base-year floor space data are essential for integrated land use transport models. This information has traditionally been estimated on the basis of limited population or employment data provided by the census, with unknown accuracy. Advances in geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing technology enable the accuracy of this conventional method to be evaluated with geographic data of high precision. This study assessed the accuracy of the census-based approach in estimating base-year floor space data; the paper describes the use of a hybrid method that combines lidar and geographic vector data (referred to as the “lidar-GIS method”) to develop a ground truth building floor space database for the City of Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. A ground survey proved that the developed ground truth building data set provided highly accurate estimates of building heights, footprint areas, and therefore floor space. Through a case study, the floor space at the dissemination area level estimated with the traditional census-based method was compared with the floor space estimated with the lidar-GIS method for various land use categories. The results showed that for the residential floor space estimation, the average absolute percentage error of the census-based approach was 15%. The accuracy of the conventional method was much lower for nonresidential land use categories, with average errors of 50% or higher. These statistics indicate that the traditional census-based approach is unreliable and inaccurate for use in the estimation of base-year floor space and suggests that a method that incorporates the above-mentioned modern information technologies be used.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Abraham J. E., Weidner T., Gliebe J., Wilson C., and Hunt J. D. Three Methods for Synthesizing Base-Year Built Form for Integrated Land Use–Transport Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1902, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 114–123.
2. O'Connor J. Land Use Planning and Transportation. Pima Association of Governments, Tucson, Ariz., 2010.
3. Waddell P., Peak C., and Caballero P. UrbanSim: Database Development for the Puget Sound Region. Technical Report CUSPA-04-01. Center for Urban Simulation and Policy Analysis, University of Washington, Seattle, 2004.
4. Pflum E. K. Employment Density in the Puget Sound Region. MS thesis. University of Washington, 2004.
5. Walker W. T., Gao S., and Johnston R. A. UPlan: Geographic Information System as Framework for Integrated Land Use Planning Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1994, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 117–127.
6. Abraham J. E., Andersen K., Clay M., and Hunt J. D. Calibrating a Synthetic Built Form Generator. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2133, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 100–108.
7. Oregon Statewide Integrated Model (SWIM2) Model Description. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2010.
8. Liu X., and Zhang Z. LIDAR Data Reduction for Efficient and High Quality DEM Generation. Proc., 21st Congress of the International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Beijing, 2008, pp. 174–178.
9. Miller E. J. Land Use Transportation Modeling. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003.
10. Mir M. S., Rao K. V. K., and Hunt J. D. Data Solutions for Developing a Space Development Model of a Developing Metropolitan Region. Proc., International Conference on Transportation System Studies, 2008, pp. 51–66.
11. TRANUS: Integrated Land Use and Transport Modeling System. Modelistica, Caracas, Venezuela, 2007.
12. Johnston R. A., Rodier C. J., Abraham J. E., and Hunt J. D. Applying an Integrated Model to the Evaluation of Travel Demand Management Policies in the Sacramento Region: Year Two. Report FHWA/CA/OR-2001-28. California Department of Transportation, San Jose, 2001.
13. Martínez F. MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 126–134.
14. Revill E., and Simmonds D. Calibrating a Household Relocation Model for Leicestershire. Proc., European Transport Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2011, p. 14.
15. Isenburg M. Efficient Tools for LiDAR Processing. http://lastools.org.
16. American Housing Survey for the United States. U.S. Census Bureau, 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 28, 2019
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sajad Shiravi
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
Ming Zhong
Intelligent Transport Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, 1040 Heping Avenue, P.O. Box 125, Wuhan 430063, China
Seyed Ahad Beykaei
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 Saint George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Faranak Hosseini
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. A method for estimating localised space-use pattern and its applicatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub