Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 28, 2019

Modeling Joint Charging and Parking Choices of Electric Vehicle Drivers: Decentralized Control Approach for Charging Service Providers

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) offer significant opportunities to improve sustainability of the road transport sector. But simultaneously, widespread adoption of EVs would create new challenges. For example, spatiotemporal concentration of charging events in high-density residential or commercial areas would place extreme demands on the power network, causing bottlenecks and grid instability. A novel approach to the typical decentralized control methods for EV charging service providers (CSPs) is presented. First, static price signals based on anticipated demand define a set of charging offers, targeted to segments of EV users. Prices are differentiated either only by time or both by time and place and allow comparison and evaluation of both scenarios. A choice-based revenue management method is employed to optimize allocation of generated charging offers, with respect to revenue outcome for the CSP. The charging coordination techniques are demonstrated through simulation. Data come from the London Travel Demand Survey and particularly trips around Westfield, one of Europe's largest urban shopping malls, representing out-of-home charging behavior for short intervals in a high-demand area. Findings suggest that in a first-come, first-served system, locational pricing might create opportunities both for increased revenue and for relocation of charging events to less-congested facilities. In the revenue management system, locational pricing significantly favors total revenue outcome but without discharging vulnerable areas. However, because agents with conflicting interests participate in the process (infrastructure owners, power system operators, EV drivers), opportunity exists for the CSP to adapt constraints according to the priority of its objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. European Green Cars Initiative. European Roadmap. Electrification of Road Transport. PPP European Green Cars Initiative. Berlin, 2010. http://www.green-cars-initiative.eu/public/documents/Roadmap%20Electrification.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2012.
2. Clement-Nyns K., Haesen E., and Driesen J. The Impact of Charging Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2010, pp. 371–380.
3. Giordano V., and Fulli G. A Business Case for Smart Grid Technologies: A Systemic Perspective. Energy Policy, Vol. 40, 2012, pp. 252–259.
4. Lin Z., and Greene D. L. Promoting the Market for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles: Role of Recharge Availability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2252, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 49–56.
5. Axsen J., and Kurani K. S. The Early U.S. Market for PHEVs: Anticipating Consumer Awareness, Recharge Potential, Design Priorities, and Energy Impacts. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-08-22. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 2008.
6. Mayor of London, Greater London Authority, London's Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Strategy, 2009. https://www.sourcelondon.net/sites/default/files/draft%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Infrastructure%20Strategy.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2014.
7. Gómez San Román T., Momber I., Abbad M. R., and Miralles Á. Sánchez. Regulatory Framework and Business Models for Charging Plug-In Electric Vehicles: Infrastructure, Agents, and Commercial Relationships. Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2011, pp. 6360–6375.
8. Bessa R. J., and Matos M.A. Economic and Technical Management of an Aggregation Agent for Electric Vehicles: A Literature Survey. European Transactions on Electrical Power, Vol. 22, 2012, pp. 334–350.
9. García-Villalobos J., Zamora I., San Martín J. I., Asensio F. J., and Aperribay V. Plug-In Electric Vehicles in Electric Distribution Networks: A Review of Smart Charging Approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 38, 2014, pp. 717–731.
10. Electricity Distribution Structure of Charges: Distribution Charging Methodology at Lower Voltages. Ofgem Decision Document, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, London, 2009.
11. Brandstätt C., Brunekreeft G., and Friedrichsen N. Locational Signals to Reduce Network Investments in Smart Distribution Grids: What Works and What Not? Utilities Policies, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2011, pp. 244–254.
12. Talluri K. T., and van Ryzin G. J. The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 68. Springer, Berlin, 2004.
13. Talluri K. T., and van Ryzin G. J. Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behaviour. Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2004, pp. 15–33.
14. Latinopoulos C., Sivakumar A., and Polak J. W. Efficient Operation of Parking Facilities Under the Charging Demand of Electric Vehicles: A Choice-Based Revenue Management Approach. Presented at 46th Annual Conference, Universities' Transport Study Group, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 2014.
15. Transport for London. Travel in London, Supplementary Report: London Travel Demand Survey (LTDS), 2011.
16. BBC News. A Year in the Shadow of Westfield. Press release, Oct. 30, 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8327455.stm.
17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fuel Economy. http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/. Accessed July 15, 2014.
18. Small K. The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 3, 1982, pp. 467–479.
19. Axhausen K. W., and Polak J. W. Choice of Parking: Stated Preference Approach. Transportation, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1991, pp. 59–81.
20. Talluri K. T. A Randomized Concave Programming Method for Choice Network Revenue Management. Technical Report. Working Paper 1215. Department of Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 2010.
21. Meissner J., Strauss A., and Talluri K. An Enhanced Concave Program Relaxation for Choice Network Revenue Management. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, pp. 71–87.
22. Bront J. J. M., Méndez-Díaz I., and Vulcano G. A Column Generation Algorithm for Choice-Based Network Revenue Management. Operations Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2009, pp. 769–784.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 28, 2019
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Charilaos Latinopoulos
Centre for Transport Studies, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Aruna Sivakumar
Centre for Transport Studies, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
John W. Polak
Centre for Transport Studies, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 58

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Response of electric vehicle drivers to dynamic pricing of parking and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Hazard based modelling of electric vehicles charging patterns
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub