Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online March 5, 2019

Simulated Traffic Conflicts: Do They Accurately Represent Field-Measured Conflicts?

Abstract

Recently, there has been growing interest in using microsimulation models to assess the safety of road facilities by analyzing vehicle trajectories and estimating conflict indicators. Using microsimulation models in safety studies can have several advantages, although concerns have been raised about the ability of these models to represent unsafe vehicle interactions and near misses realistically as well as their need for rigorous calibration. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between field-measured and simulated conflicts at an urban signalized intersection in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Sixty hours of recorded traffic data were collected in 2 days and used in the conflict analysis. Automated video-based computer vision techniques were used to extract vehicle trajectories and identify conflicts on all four approaches to the intersection. Conflict measures (e.g., time to collision) and location were determined and compared with simulated conflicts from a microscopic simulation model (VISSIM) using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). A two-step calibration procedure was proposed to enhance correlation between simulated and field-measured conflicts. The first calibration step was matching actual field conditions (desired speed and arrival type) to ensure that VISSIM gives real average delay values. The second step was the use of sensitivity analysis followed by a genetic algorithm procedure to calibrate the VISSIM parameters that had the biggest effect on the simulated conflicts. Finally, conflict heat maps were provided to compare field-measured with simulated conflict locations. The results highlighted the importance of model calibration and identified several limitations of the SSAM.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sayed T., and Zein S. Traffic Conflict Standards for Intersections. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 22, 1999, pp. 309–323.
2. Sayed T. Brown G., and Navin F. Simulation of Traffic Conflicts at Unsignalized Intersections with TSC–Sim. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 5, 1994, pp. 593–607.
3. Autey J. Sayed T., and Zaki M. Safety Evaluation of Right-Turn Smart Channels Using Automated Traffic Conflict Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 120–130.
4. Chin H.-C., and Quek S.-T. Measurement of Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1997, pp. 169–185.
5. Ismail K. Sayed T., and Saunier N. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts: Context for Before-and-After Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2198, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 52–64.
6. Amundsen F., and Hydén C. Proceedings of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1977, s.n.
7. Svensson, Å., and C. Hydén. Estimating the Severity of Safety Related Behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 379–385.
8. Sayed T. Ismail K. Zaki M. H., and Autey J. Feasibility of Computer Vision–Based Safety Evaluations: Case Study of a Signalized Right-Turn Safety Treatment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2280, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 18–27.
9. Sayed T. Zaki M., and Autey J. Automated Safety Diagnosis of Vehicle–Bicycle Interactions using Computer Vision Analysis. Safety Science, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 163–172.
10. Gettman D., and Head L. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 104–115.
11. Gettman D. Pu L. Sayed T., and Shelby S. G. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report. Report FHWA-HRT-08-051. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
12. Shahdah U. Saccomanno F., and Persaud B. Integrated Traffic Conflict Model for Estimating Crash Modification Factors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 71, 2014, pp. 228–235.
13. Wang C., and Stamatiadis N. Evaluation of a Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Metric. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 71, 2014, pp. 82–92.
14. Tarko A. P., and Songchitruksa P. Estimating Frequency of Crashes as Extreme Traffic Events. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
15. Saunier N. Sayed T., and Lim C. Probabilistic Collision Prediction for Vision-Based Automated Road Safety Analysis. Proc., IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2007 (ITSC 2007), IEEE, New York, 2007, pp. 872–878.
16. Dijkstra A. Marchesini P. Bijleveld F. Kars V. Drolenga H., and van Maarseveen M. Do Calculated Conflicts in Microsimulation Model Predict Number of Crashes? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 105–112.
17. Cunto F., and Saccomanno F. F. Calibration and Validation of Simulated Vehicle Safety Performance at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1171–1179.
18. Duong D. Saccomanno F., and Hellinga B. Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Model for Simulating Safety Performance. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
19. Fan R. Yu H. Liu P., and Wang W. Using VISSIM Simulation Model and Surrogate Safety Assessment Model for Estimating Field Measured Traffic Conflicts at Freeway Merge Areas. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2013, pp. 68–77.
20. Huang F. Liu P. Yu H., and Wang W. Identifying If VISSIM Simulation Model and SSAM Provide Reasonable Estimates for Field Measured Traffic Conflicts at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 1014–1024.
21. Saunier N., and Sayed T. A Feature-Based Tracking Algorithm for Vehicles in Intersections. Proc., 3rd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, IEEE, New York, 2006.
22. Saunier N., and Sayed T. Automated Analysis of Road Safety with Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 57–64.
23. Saunier N., and Sayed T. A. Probabilistic Framework for Automated Analysis of Exposure to Road Collision. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 96–104.
24. Saunier N. Sayed T., and Ismail K. Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 42–50.
25. Zaki M. H. Sayed T. Tageldin A., and Hussein M. Application of Computer Vision to Diagnosis of Pedestrian Safety Issues. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2393, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 75–84.
26. Tageldin A. Sayed T. Zaki M., and Azab M. A Safety Evaluation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System Using Computer Vision. Advances in Transportation Studies, Special Issue, Vol. 2, 2014, pp. 83–96.
27. Ismail K. Sayed T., and Saunier N. A Methodology for Precise Camera Calibration for Data Collection Applications in Urban Traffic Scenes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2013, pp. 57–67.
28. VISSIM 5. 30–05 User Manual. PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2011.
29. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, Chap. 15. ISBN 0–309-06681-6.
30. Goldberg D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1989.
31. Park B., and Qi H. Development and Evaluation of a Calibration and Validation Procedure for Microscopic Simulation Models. Report FHWA/ VTRC 05-CR1. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
32. Park B., and Won J. Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation Handbook. Report FHWA/VTRC 07-CR6. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
33. Park B., and Qi H. Development and Evaluation of a Procedure for the Calibration of Simulation Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1934, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 208–217.
34. Park B. Won J., and Yun I. Application of Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation Procedure: Case Study of Coordinated Actuated Signal System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1978, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 113–122.
35. Sacchi E. Sayed T., and deLeur P. A Comparison of Collision-Based and Conflict-Based Safety Evaluations: The Case of Right-Turn Smart Channels. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 260–266.
36. El-Basyouny K., and Sayed T. Safety Performance Functions using Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 51, 2013, pp. 160–164.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 5, 2019
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Essa
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Tarek Sayed
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 381

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 62

  1. A review of surrogate safety measures on road safety at unsignalized i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Extensive hypothesis testing for estimation of crash frequency models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Real-Time multi-objective optimization of safety and mobility at signa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Surrogate Safety Assessment of Traffic Facilities under Ordered and Di...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A comparison of pedestrian behavior in interactions with autonomous an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Advances and applications of computer vision techniques in vehicle tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Traffic Safety Assessment with Integrated Communication System of Conn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. An Optimization Framework for Crash Count Data Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Development of the Social Force Model Considering Pedestrian Character...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Multiagent modeling of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using Adversarial ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Turbo-Roundabouts as an Instrument for Improving the Efficiency and Sa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Calibrating stochastic traffic simulation models for safety and operat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Validation of traffic conflicts extracted from a simulation model (VIS...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Can motorcyclist behavior in traffic conflicts be modeled? A deep rein...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Real-Time Crash-Risk Optimization at Signalized Intersections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Modeling Motorcyclist–Pedestrian Near Misses: A Multiagent Adversarial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A Reliability-Based Framework to Assess the Impacts of Increasing Free...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Analysis of the influence of motorcycle taxis in delays and vehicular ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Rear-End Conflict Variation at Signalized Intersections Under Non-lane...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Review of traffic safety evaluation at T-intersections using surrogate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Safety and Sustainable Development of Automated Driving in Mixed-Traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Comparison of Feature Selection Algorithms for Traffic Micro-Simulatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Testing Connected Vehicle-Based Accident Mitigation for Red-Light Viol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Transferability of multivariate extreme value models for safety assess...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. A Novel Dynamic Lane-Changing Trajectory Planning Model for Automated ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Detection of Collision-Prone Vehicle Behavior at Intersections Using S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Multi-criteria comparative assessment of unconventional roundabout des...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Using High-Resolution Signal Controller Data in the Calibration of Sig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. A functional approach for characterizing safety risk of signalized int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Modeling pedestrian behavior in pedestrian-vehicle near misses: A cont...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. A Review of Car-Following Models and Modeling Tools for Human and Auto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Investigating safety impact of sun glare in urban tunnels based on cel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Event-based road safety assessment: A novel approach towards risk micr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Driving Safety Performance Assessment Metrics for ADS-Equipped ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Self-learning adaptive traffic signal control for real-time safety opt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. An Integrated Microsimulation Approach for Safety Performance Assessme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Comparison between Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Real-Time Saf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. A novel skateboarder-related near-crash identification method with roa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Method for Assessing Effect of Input Parameters on Multiobjective Opti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Safety Evaluation at Urban Intersections Using Surrogate Measures
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Estimation of traffic conflicts using precise lateral position and wid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Two‐fold calibration approach for microscopic traffic simulation model...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Do Simulated Traffic Conflicts Predict Crashes? An Investigation Using...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Multi-Objective Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Simulation for High...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. A microsimulation approach for the impact assessment of a Vehicle-to-I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Full Bayesian conflict-based models for real time safety evaluation of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Assessing right-turning vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at intersections ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Transferability of real-time safety performance functions for signaliz...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization Algorithms to Calibrate Micros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Micro-simulation modelling for traffic safety: A review and potential ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. A comparison between simulated and field-measured conflicts for safety...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. A Simulation Study of Predicting Real-Time Conflict-Prone Traffic Cond...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Traffic conflict models to evaluate the safety of signalized intersect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Microscopic Simulation-Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Safety and Op...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Analysis of drivers’ performance in response to potential collision wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Empirical Analysis on Risky Behaviors and Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. A comparison between PARAMICS and VISSIM in estimating automated field...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for saf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub