Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Developing Calibration Factors for Crash Prediction Models with Consideration of Crash Recording Threshold Change

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on presenting a revised method to develop calibration factors (CFs) with consideration of the change in the crash recording threshold (CRT), which is a minimum value to report crashes. The higher the CRT, the fewer the number of recorded property damage only (PDO) crashes. In this paper, a threshold adjustment factor was defined and used to estimate the new CFs. Because the threshold change affects only the total number of crashes and the PDO crashes, the percentage of fatal and injury (F/I) crashes before the threshold change needs to be adjusted to properly estimate the total number of F/I crashes. The revised method was verified with case studies using Illinois data. Five years of crash data were gathered and used to develop CFs for five roadway types, including two-lane undivided (2U), two-lane with a two-way left-turn lane (3T), four-lane undivided (4U), four-lane divided (4D), and four-lane with a two-way left-turn lane (5T). Because of an increase in the CRT in 2009, a method is needed to supplement the standard approach to adjust CFs with consideration of the effect of the new CRT. The CFs for 2U and 3T before–after considering the threshold adjustment factor were 1.44/1.32 and 1.24/1.12, respectively, while the CFs before–after the threshold change for 4U, 4D, and 5T were 0.99/0.85, 0.68/0.55, and 0.77/0.69, respectively. The results proved that the revised method can help state and local agencies predict the number of crashes without redeveloping new CFs resulting from the change in CRT.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Highway Safety Manual 2010. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). www.nhtsa.gov/FARS. Accessed May 01, 2014.
Zhao J. Calibrating the Highway Safety Manual Safety Performance Function with Crash Data in Illinois. Presented at 2013 Midwestern District ITE Conference, Milwaukee, Wis., 2013.
Srinivasan S., Haas P., Dhakar N. S., Hormel R., Torbic D., and Harwood D. Development and Calibration of Highway Safety Manual Equations for Florida Conditions. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2011.
Dixon K., Monsere C., Xie F., and Gladhill K. Calibrating the Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods for Oregon Highways. Publication FHWA-OR-RD-12-07. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
Wemple E., Foster N., and Bergh C. Application of the Highway Safety Manual to Predict Crash Frequency. Presented at Australasian Transport Research Forum 2010, Canberra, Australia, 2010
Srinivasan R., and Carter D. Development of Safety Performance Functions for North Carolina. Publication FHWA-NC-2010-09. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
Mehta G., and Lou Y. Calibration and Development of Safety Performance Functions for Alabama: Two-Lane, Two-Way Rural Roads and Four-Lane Divided Highways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2398, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 75–82.
Bonneson J., and Pratt M. Calibration Factors Handbook: Safety Prediction Models Calibrated with Texas Highway System Data. Publication FHWA-TX-08-0-4703-5. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
Wolshon B. Calibration of the Louisiana Highway Safety Manual. Louisiana State University, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Baton Rouge, La., 2012.
User's Guide to Develop Highway Safety Manual Safety Performance Function Calibration Factors. Publication NCHRP 20-0. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013.
Williamson M. Application of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official's Highway Safety Manual to Rural Illinois Roadways. Presented at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (SIUE) at Edwardsville, Ill., in partial fulfillment of requirements for master of science degree, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Jalayer
Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn, AL 36849-5337.
Huaguo Zhou
Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn, AL 36849-5337.
Michael Williamson
Department of Civil Engineering, Indiana State University, 101 North Sixth Street, Terre Haute, IN 47809-1902.
Jeffrey J. LaMondia
Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn, AL 36849-5337.

Notes

The Standing Committee on Highway Safety Performance peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 31

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Calibrating the Highway Safety Manual Predictive Models for Multilane ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A multiple correspondence analysis of at‐fault motorcycle‐involved cra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub