Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 28, 2019

Neighborhood Characteristics that Support Bicycle Commuting: Analysis of the Top 100 U.S. Census Tracts

Abstract

This study examined American Community Survey journey-to-work data from 2008 to 2012 to identify the characteristics of neighborhoods with the highest levels of bicycle commuting in the United States. The 100 census tracts with the highest bicycle commute mode shares (top 100 census tracts) were identified and paired with 100 other randomly selected census tracts from the same county (100 comparison census tracts). As a whole, the top 100 census tracts had a bicycle commute mode share of 21%. Seventy of the top 100 census tracts were in locations that had fewer than 10 days per year with high temperatures below 32°F (0°C), and 68 were within 2 mi (3.2 km) of a college or university campus. Seventeen had relatively low college populations and were in high-density neighborhoods close to large city central business districts. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of a paired tract being in the top 100 rather than the comparison tract. After climate and topography were controlled for, being a top 100 census tract was associated with several socioeconomic and local-environment characteristics, including being located closer to a university and having more households without automobiles, more people born in other states and countries, higher population density, more housing constructed before 1940, and greater bicycle facility density. The results suggest that policies to model employment centers after university campuses; design neighborhoods that support routine, multimodal travel; and reduce barriers to bicycling in bad weather may help create more local areas with high rates of bicycle commuting.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. American Community Survey. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2014. http://factfinder2.census.gov/.
2. Pucher J., and Buehler R. (eds.). City Cycling. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London, 2012.
3. Alliance for Bicycling and Walking. Bicycling and Walking in the United States: Benchmarking Report, 2014. http://bikewalkalliance.org/resources/benchmarking.
4. League of American Bicyclists. Bicycle Friendly America Program, 2014. http://bikeleague.org/bfa, 2014.
5. Census Explorer: Commuting Edition. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/censusexplorer/censusexplorer-commuting.html, 2014.
6. Krizek K., Forsyth A., and Baum L. Walking and Cycling International Literature Review. Final report. Department of Transport, State of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/31369/WalkingCyclingLiteratureReview.pdf, 2009.
7. Pucher J., Dill J., and Handy S. Infrastructure, Programs, and Policies to Increase Bicycling: An International Review. Preventive Medicine, Volume 50, 2010, S106–S125.
8. Heinen E., van Wee B., and Maat K. Bicycle Use for Commuting: An Overview of the Literature. Transport Reviews, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2010, pp. 59–96.
9. Haynes M., and Andrzejewski S. GIS-Based Bicycle and Pedestrian Demand Forecasting Techniques. Travel Model Improvement Program Webinar, April 29, 2010. http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/sites/tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/files/fehr_and_peers.pdf.
10. Jones M. G., Ryan S., Donlan J., Ledbetter L., Arnold L., and Ragland D. Seamless Travel: Measuring Bicycle and Pedestrian Activity in San Diego County and Its Relationship to Land Use, Transportation, Safety, and Facility Type. Alta Planning and Design and Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
11. Griswold J. B., Medury A., and Schneider R. J. Pilot Models for Estimating Bicycle Intersection Volumes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2247, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 1–7.
12. Strauss J., and Miranda-Moreno L. F. Spatial Modeling of Bicycle Activity at Signalized Intersections. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013, pp. 47–58.
13. Heinen E., Maat K., and van Wee B. Day-to-Day Choice to Commute or Not by Bicycle. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2230, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 9–18.
14. Buehler R. Determinants of Bicycle Commuting in the Washington, DC Region: The Role of Bicycle Parking, Cyclist Showers, and Free Car Parking at Work. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 525–531.
15. Dill J., and Carr T. Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 116–123.
16. Buehler R., and Pucher J. Cycling to Work in 90 Large American Cities: New Evidence on the Role of Bike Paths and Lanes. Transportation, Vol. 39, 2012, pp. 409–432.
17. Sears J., Flynn B. S., Aultman-Hall L., and Dana G. S. To Bike or Not to Bike: Seasonal Factors for Bicycle Commuting. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2314, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2012, pp. 105–111.
18. McKenzie B. Modes Less Traveled—Bicycling and Walking to Work in the United States: 2008–2012. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-25. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2014. http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/acs-25.pdf.
19. Pucher J., Buehler R., and Seinen M. Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An Update and Reappraisal of Cycling Trends and Policies. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 45, 2011, pp. 451–475.
20. Smart M. U.S. Immigrants and Bicycling: Two-Wheeled in Autopia. Transport Policy, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2010, pp. 153–159.
21. U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know. 2008. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/handbooks/ACSGeneralHandbook.pdf.
22. The American Community Survey, 2014 Questionnaire. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2014. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/questionnaires/2014/Quest14.pdf.
23. National Climatic Data Center. 1981–2010 U.S. Climate Normals. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2014. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/climate-normals/1981-2010-normals-data.
24. McMahon P. J., Duncan C., Stewart J. R., Zegeer C. V., and Khattak A. J. Analysis of Factors Contributing to “Walking Along Roadway” Crashes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 41–48.
25. Teschke K., Harris M. A., Reynolds C. C. O., Winters M., Babul S., Chipman M., Cusimano M. D., Brubacher J. R., Hunte G., Friedman S. M., Monro M., Shen H., Vemich L., and Cripton P. A. Route Infrastructure and the Risk of Injuries to Bicyclists: A Case-Crossover Study. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 102, No. 12, 2012, pp. 2336–2343.
26. StataCorp. Stata Release 13: Base Reference Manual. State Press, College Station, Tex., 2013. http://www.stata.com/manuals13/rclogit.pdf.
27. Schneider R. J. Theory of Routine Mode Choice Decisions: An Operational Framework to Increase Sustainable Transportation. Transport Policy, Vol. 25, 2013, pp. 128–137.
28. Cao X., Handy S. L., and Mokhtarian P. L. The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1–20.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 28, 2019
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Robert J. Schneider
Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 2131 East Hartford Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211.
Joseph Stefanich
Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 2131 East Hartford Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 93

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 10

  1. Individual perceptions of critical factors on route affecting the will...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Equity implications of electric bikesharing in Philadelphia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Correlates of bicycling trip flows in Hamilton, Ontario: fastest, quie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A geographically weighted regression model to examine the spatial vari...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A composite zonal index for biking attractiveness and safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Bikesharing in Philadelphia: Do lower-income areas generate trips?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Development of a neighborhood commute mode share model using nationall...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Does new bicycle infrastructure result in new or rerouted bicyclists? ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Association between innovative dockless bicycle sharing programs and a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The impact of urban characteristics and residents’ income on commuting...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub