Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 28, 2019

Can Time Proximity Measures be Used as Safety Indicators in All Driving Cultures?: Case Study of Motorcycle Safety in China

Abstract

Limitations associated with traditional collision-based safety analysis techniques led to a growing interest in the use of surrogate safety measures such as the traffic conflict technique. This interest was facilitated by advances in automated video-based data collection methods that helped to overcome the reliability issues associated with manual collection of data on traffic conflicts. Various objective conflict indicators that measure various spatial and temporal aspects of user proximity are available to measure the severity of traffic events. These time-proximity conflict measures assume that proximity is a surrogate for conflict severity. However, this assumption may not be valid in many driving environments. The objective of this paper is to investigate whether time-proximity conflict measures can be a good indicator of safety in less-organized traffic environments with highly mixed road users. A case study of motorcycle conflicts in a highly congested shared intersection in Shanghai, China, was used as a case study. Traffic conflicts were analyzed with the use of automated video-based analysis techniques. Several traffic conflict indicators designed to detect evasive actions, such as deceleration, jerk, and yaw rate, were recommended as better able to measure traffic conflicts in such traffic environments. The results showed that indicators that measured evasive actions had higher potential to identify motorcycle conflicts in highly mixed, less-organized traffic environments than did time-proximity measures such as the time to collision.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sayed T., and Zein S. Traffic Conflict Standards for Intersections. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 309–323.
2. Autey J., Sayed T., and Zaki M. H. Safety Evaluation of Right-Turn Smart Channels Using Automated Traffic Conflict Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 120–130.
3. Perkins S. R., and Harris J. I. Traffic Conflict Characteristics: Accident Potential at Intersections. In Highway Research Record 225, HRB, National Research Council, 1968, pp. 35–43.
4. Amundsen F., and Hydén C. Proceedings of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Economics, Lund Institute of Technology, Oslo, Norway, 1977.
5. Ismail K., Sayed T., and Saunier N. Methodologies for Aggregating Indicators of Traffic Conflict. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2237, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 10–19.
6. Tiwari G., Mohan D., and Fazio J. Conflict Analysis for Prediction of Fatal Crash Locations in Mixed Traffic Streams. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1998, pp. 207–215.
7. Vehicle Ownership Database. Department of Traffic Police, City of Shanghai, China, 2006.
8. Yang L., Jun Q., Guo-Dong L., Ji-Hong Z., Liang Z., Zheng-Guo W., Xin-Cai Z., and Zhi-Quan J. Motorcycle Accidents in China. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2008, pp. 243–246.
9. Haque M. M., Chin H. C., and Huan H. Examining Exposure of Motorcycles at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2048, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 60–65.
10. Yao L., and Wu C. Traffic Safety for Electric Bike Riders in China: Attitudes, Risk Perception, and Aberrant Riding Behaviors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2314, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 49–56.
11. Ariannezhad A., Razi-Ardakani H., and Kermanshah M. Exploring Factors Contributing to Crash Severity of Motorcycles at Suburban Roads. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
12. Tarrall M. B., and Dixon K. K. Conflict Analysis for Double Left-Turn Lanes with Protected-Plus-Permitted Signal Phases. In Transportation Research Record 1635, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 105–112.
13. Sayed T., Ismail K., Zaki M. H., and Autey J. Feasibility of Computer Vision-Based Safety Evaluations: Case Study of a Signalized Right-Turn Safety Treatment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2280, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 2012, pp. 18–27.
14. Sayed T., Zaki M. H., and Autey J. Automated Safety Diagnosis of Vehicle–Bicycle Interactions Using Computer Vision Analysis. Safety Science, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 163–172.
15. Zaki M. H., Sayed T., Tageldin A., and Hussein M. Application of Computer Vision to Diagnosis of Pedestrian Safety Issues. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2393, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 75–84.
16. Long X. N., Hanaoka S., and Kawasaki T. Traffic Conflict Assessment for Non-Lane-Based Movements of Motorcycles Under Congested Conditions. IATSS Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2014, pp. 137–147.
17. Baluja R. Assessing Road Safety Through Road Traffic Violations: A Case Study of New Delhi, India. UNECE Transport Review, United Nations Commission for Europe, 2008, pp. 98–99.
18. Chin H.-C., and Quek S.-T. Measurement of Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1997, pp. 169–185.
19. Hayward J. C. Near-Miss Determination Through Use of a Scale of Danger. In Highway Research Record 384, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1972, pp. 24–34.
20. Allen B. L., Shin B. T., and Cooper P. J. Analysis of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions. In Transportation Research Record 667, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 67–74.
21. Archer J. Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Traffic Safety at Urban Intersections and their Application in Micro-Simulation Modeling. PhD dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.
22. Topp H. Traffic Safety Work with Video-Processing. University Kaiserslautern and Fachgebiet Verkehrswesen, 1998. In German.
23. Gettman D., and Head L. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 104–115.
24. Wahlberg A. The Relation of Acceleration Force to Traffic Accident Frequency: A Pilot Study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2000, pp. 29–38.
25. Zaki M. H., Sayed T., and Shaaban K. Use Drivers' Jerk Profiles in Computer Vision–Based Traffic Safety Evaluations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2434, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 103–112.
26. Bagdadi O. Estimation of the Severity of Safety Critical Events. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 167–174.
27. Wahlberg A. Speed Choice Versus Celeration Behavior as Traffic Accident Predictor. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006, pp. 43–51.
28. Ayres G., Wilson B., and LeBlanc J. Method for Identifying Vehicle Movements for Analysis of Field Operational Test Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1886, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, p. 92–100.
29. Johnson D. A., and Trivedi M. M. Driving Style Recognition Using a Smartphone as a Sensor Platform. In Proc., 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, D.C., October 5–7, 2011.
30. Hagelin H. Detection of Critical Events Using Limited Sensors. MS thesis. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2012.
31. Saunier N., and Sayed T. A Feature-Based Tracking Algorithm for Vehicles in Intersections. IEEE, Third Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, 2006.
32. Saunier N., and Sayed T. Automated Analysis of Road Safety with Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 57–64.
33. Ismail K., Sayed T., and Saunier N. A Methodology for Precise Camera Calibration for Data Collection Applications in Urban Traffic Scenes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2013, pp. 57–67.
34. Saunier N., and Sayed T. A Feature-Based Tracking Algorithm for Vehicles in Intersections. Presented at 3rd Canadian Conference on Conference: Computer and Robot Vision, 2006.
35. Ismail K., Sayed T., and Saunier N. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian– Vehicle Conflicts: Context for Before-and-After Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2198, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 52–64.
36. Savitzky A., and Golay M. Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1964, pp. 1627–1639.
37. Bagdadi O., and Várhelyi A. Development of a Method for Detecting Jerks in Safety Critical Events. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 83–91.
38. Svensson A. Vidareutveckling och Validering av den Svnska Konflikttekniken [Further Development and Validation of the Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique]. In Swedish. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1992.
39. Fleiss J. L. Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 76, No. 5, 1971, pp. 378–382.
40. Sacchi E., Sayed T., and deLeur P. A Comparison of Collision-Based and Conflict-Based Safety Evaluations: The Case of Right-Turn Smart Channels. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 260–266.
41. El-Basyouny K., and Sayed T. Safety Performance Functions Using Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 51, 2013, pp. 160–164.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 28, 2019
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmed Tageldin
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.
Tarek Sayed
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.
Xuesong Wang
School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao'an Road, Shanghai 201804, China.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 229

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 51

  1. Understanding e-bicycle overtaking strategy: insights from inverse rei...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Effect of vehicle size on crash risk in a heterogeneous traffic scenar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A review of surrogate safety measures on road safety at unsignalized i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Exploratory analysis of evasion actions of powered two-wheeler conflic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Examining the effect of vehicle type on right-turn crossing conflicts ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A comparison of pedestrian behavior in interactions with autonomous an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Association of crash potential of powered two-wheelers with the state ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Assessing the crash risk of mixed traffic on multilane rural highways ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Optimal Matching between Vehicle Speed and Lighting at Intersection Ba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A conflict-based safety assessment technique for rear-end crash risk a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Non-stationary crash risk modelling of powered two-wheelers using extr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A revise on using surrogate safety measures for rear-end crashes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Challenges in Rear-end Conflict-based Safety Assessment of Highly Diso...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Spatiotemporal Variation of Traffic Conflict at Signalized Intersectio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Driver behavior indices from large-scale fleet telematics data as surr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Can motorcyclist behavior in traffic conflicts be modeled? A deep rein...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Modeling lateral interactions between motorized vehicles and non-motor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Calculating dynamic thresholds for critical time to collision as a saf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Modeling Motorcyclist–Pedestrian Near Misses: A Multiagent Adversarial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Evasive action characteristics of motorcycle riders towards occluded-s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Learning the representation of surrogate safety measures to identify t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Development of a conflict risk evaluation model to assess pedestrian s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Applying different analytic methods to determine black spots in two-la...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Transferability of multivariate extreme value models for safety assess...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Introducing novel statistical-based method of screening and combining ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. A Comprehensive Review on the Behaviour of Motorcyclists: Motivations,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Evaluation of motorized two-wheeler rider responses towards jaywalking...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Evasive Action Characteristics of Motorcycle Riders Towards Occluded-S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Association of Crash Potential of Powered Two Wheelers (Ptw) with the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Investigating consecutive conflicts of pedestrian crossing at unsignal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Spatiotemporal Variation of Rear-End Conflicts at Signalized Intersect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Applying Machine Learning to Develop Lane Control Principles for Mixed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Toward a crowdsourcing solution to identify high-risk highway segments...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. TRAFFIC CONFLICT IDENTIFICATION OF E-BIKES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. A generic multi-scale framework for microscopic traffic simulation par...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Examining two-wheelers' overtaking behavior and lateral distance choic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Increasing the efficiency of vehicle ad-hoc network to enhance the saf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Five key components based risk indicators ontology for the modelling a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Models to evaluate the severity of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts in fiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Evaluating the safety impacts of powered two wheelers on a shared road...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Safety benefits of arterials’ crash risk under connected and automated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Assessing safety of shared space using cyclist-pedestrian interactions...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Exploring Evasive Action–Based Indicators for PTW Conflicts in Shared ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Safety Analysis of Access Zone Design for Managed Toll Lanes on Freewa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Automated class identification of modes of travel in shared spaces: a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Examining pedestrian evasive actions as a potential indicator for traf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Comparison of Time-Proximity and Evasive Action Conflict Measures: Cas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Developing evasive action‐based indicators for identifying pedestrian ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub