Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Proposed Heavy Vehicle Encroachment Adjustment Factor

Abstract

Encroachment probability models such as the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) have traditionally assumed that heavy vehicles and passenger vehicles share the same encroachment characteristics. This assumption was reviewed in developing bridge railing selection guidelines in NCHRP 22-12(03), where an examination of a specific highway and a national sample of data indicated that trucks encroached at a different rate than passenger vehicles. This paper describes the development of a new vehicle-type encroachment adjustment factor (EAF). The results confirmed previous findings, but this analysis controlled for traffic volumes, highway type, percentage of heavy vehicles [i.e., percentage of trucks (PT)], and segment length. The result was a more robust model that was valid over a wider range of average annual daily traffic and PTs. The large data set included 635,464 segments of data from the states of Ohio and Washington. The proposed EAF was recommended for inclusion in RSAPv3. Ideally, encroachment data would be collected for heavy vehicles to determine the frequency of heavy vehicles encroaching onto the roadside and the trajectories heavy vehicles took during encroachment, but this process proved to be financially challenging. The study used crash data to carry out a comprehensive analysis of traffic volume, heavy vehicle mix, highway type, and segment length. A vehicle-type EAF was developed for divided and undivided roadways. The results provided some indication of how best to incorporate heavy vehicles in the encroachment probability model used in RSAP.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Mak K. K., and Sicking D. L. NCHRP Report 492: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP)—Engineer's Manual. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
2. AASHTO. Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings. Washington, D.C., 1989.
3. Mak K. K., Sicking D. L., Benicio de Albuquerque F. D., and Coon B. A. NCHRP Report 665: Identification of Vehicular Impact Conditions Associated with Serious Ran-off-Road Crashes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
4. Ray M. H., Carrigan C. E., Plaxico C. A., and Johnson T. O. Engineer's Manual: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) Update. Road-safe LLC, Canton, Maine, 2012. http://rsap.roadsafellc.com/RSAPv3EngineersManual.pdf.
5. Ray M. H., and Carrigan C. E. Recommended Guidelines for the Selection of Test Levels 2 through 5 Bridge Railings. NCHRP Project 22-12(03). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. (in press).
6. Carrigan C. E., Ray M. H., and Johnson T. O. Understanding Heavy-Vehicle Encroachment Frequency. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2437, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 20–26.
7. Cooper P. Analysis of Roadside Encroachments: Single Vehicle Run-Off-Road Accident Data Analysis for Five Provinces. Interim Report, B.C. Research Council, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1980.
8. Ray M. H., Carrigan C. E., and Dixon K. Consideration of Roadside Features in the Highway Safety Manual. NCHRP Project 17-54. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. (in progress).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christine E. Carrigan
RoadSafe, LLC, Box 312, 12 Main Street, Canton, ME 04221.
Malcolm H. Ray
RoadSafe, LLC, Box 312, 12 Main Street, Canton, ME 04221.

Notes

The Standing Committee on Roadside Safety Design peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 18

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub