Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Scenarios Developed for Improved Sustainability of Illinois Tollway: Life-Cycle Assessment Approach

Abstract

This paper quantifies the environmental improvements in current versus past pavement materials and construction practices employed by the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (tollway authority). Improvements in sustainability performance were measured with a life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach. Three scenarios were generated to evaluate tollway authority practices on the basis of eight 2013 Interstate reconstruction and rehabilitation projects. The first scenario, 2013 projects, analyzed the actual pavement material and designs of the 2013 projects. The second scenario, materials baseline, was based on the 2013 projects but modified to include mix designs with less-sustainable materials used by the tollway authority circa 2000. The third scenario, design and materials baseline, considered both mix designs and pavement design practices used circa 2000. To improve the spatial and temporal relevance of the analyses, two regional databases of life-cycle inventories representing processes from 2013 and 2000 were developed and applied to the 2013 projects and 2000 baselines. A tool developed by the Illinois Center for Transportation (ICT) of the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, the pavement ICT-LCA 0.95, was used to evaluate the sustainability performance indicator (SPI), global warming potential (GWP), and cumulative energy demand (CED) for each scenario. The resultant savings in SPI, GWP, and CED from the first scenario ranged between 17% and 28%, 12% and 16%, and 13% and 26%, respectively, compared with the second scenario, and 12% and 33%, 8% and 26%, and 11% and 32%, respectively, compared with the third scenario.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Zaumanis M. Warm Mix Asphalt Investigation. MS thesis. Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, 2010.
2. Hassan M. Evaluation of the Environmental and Economic Impacts of Warm-Mix Asphalt Using Life-Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2010, pp. 238–250.
3. Meli J. A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Warming Potential. Athena Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2006.
4. Ventura A., Moneron P., and Jullien A. Environmental Impact of a Binding Course Pavement Section, with Asphalt Recycled at Varying Rates: Use of Life Cycle Methodology. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 9, 2008, pp. 319–338.
5. Huang Y., Bird R., and Heidrich O. Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Construction and Maintenance of Asphalt Pavements. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009, pp. 283–296.
6. Aurangzeb Q., Al-Qadi I. L., Ozer H., and Yang R. Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment for Asphalt Mixtures with High RAP Content. Journal of Conservation of Recycling, Vol. 83, 2013, pp. 77–86.
7. Analysis of Recycling of Asphalt Shingles in Pavement Mixes from a Life Cycle Perspective. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Denver, Colo., 2013.
8. Yang R., Ozer H., Kang S., and Al-Qadi I. L. Life Cycle Impact of Producing Bituminous Mixes with Varying Degrees of Recycled Asphalt Materials. Proc., International Symposium on Pavement LCA 2014, Davis, Calif., Oct. 14–16, 2014.
9. Prusinski J. R., Marceau M. L., and VanGeem M. G. Life Cycle Inventory of Slag Cement Concrete. Presented at 8th CANMET/ACI International Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2006.
10. Thomson C. Miami Science Museum Material Embodied Energy Status Report. ARUP USA, Inc., New York, 2008.
11. Van Kirk J. L. Caltrans' Experience with Asphalt–Rubber Concrete: An Overview and Future Direction. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 1989.
12. Swearingen D. L., Jackson N. C., and Anderson K. W. Use of Recycled Materials in Highway Construction. WA-RD 252.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 1992.
13. Ground Tire Rubber (GTR) Asphalt Pavement Demonstration Project. RR-06-9092. Applied Research Associates, Champaign, Ill., 2007.
14. Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI 2.1). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.
15. Lautier A., Rosenbaum R. K., Margini M., Bare J. C., Pierre-Olivier R., and Deschenes L. Development of Normalization Factors for Canada and the United States and Comparison with European Factors. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 409, 2010, pp. 33–42.
16. Bare J., Gloria T., and Norris G. Development of the Method and U.S. Normalization Database for Life Cycle Impact Assessment and Sustainability Metrics. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 16, 2006, pp. 5108–5115.
17. Cumulative Energy Demand, Terms, Definitions, Methods of Calculation. VDI-Richtlinie 4600. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (Association of German Engineers), Düsseldorf, Germany. 1997.
18. Kang S. The Development of a Regional Inventory Database for the Material Phase of the Pavement Life-Cycle with Updated Vehicle Emission Factors Using MOVES. MS thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, 2013.
19. SimaPro, Version 7.3.3. PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands, 2012.
20. US-Ecoinvent Database, Version 2.2. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2013.
21. Kang S., Yang R., Ozer H., and Al-Qadi I. L. Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gases and Energy Consumption for Material and Construction Phases of Pavement with Traffic Delay. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2428, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 27–34.
22. Yang R. Development of a Pavement Life Cycle Assessment Tool Utilizing Regional Data and Introducing an Asphalt Binder Model. MS thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, 2014.
23. Emissions and Generation Resources Integrated Database (eGRID). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002 and 2012.
24. Diem A., and Quiroz C. How to Use eGRID for Carbon Footprinting Electricity Purchases in Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.
25. Young T. J. Energy Conservation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Production. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, Md., 2007.
26. NONROAD2008 Model. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008.
27. Electricity, Electric Sales, Revenue, and Average Price (2013). U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013. Accessed Nov. 5, 2014. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Imad L. Al-Qadi
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Rebekah Yang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Seunggu Kang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Hasan Ozer
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Eric Ferrebee
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Jeffery R. Roesler
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Alejandro Salinas
Applied Research Associates, Inc., 100 Trade Center Drive, Suite 200, Champaign, IL 61820.
Joep Meijer
Right Environment Ltd. Co., 912 Rocky Spring Road, Austin, TX 78753.
William R. Vavrik
Applied Research Associates, Inc., 100 Trade Center Drive, Suite 200, Champaign, IL 61820.
Steven L. Gillen
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, 2700 Ogden Avenue, Downers Grove, IL 60515.

Notes

The contents of this paper reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Tollway, ICT, ARA, or tRE. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The Pavement Management Section peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 137

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 21

  1. Effects of waste high-density polyethylene (HDPE) on asphalt binder an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A quantitative methodology for measuring the social sustainability of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Results of surface hot-in place recycling (remix) of modified and alte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Environmental and Economic Efficiency of Stone-Matrix Asphalt with Sur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Economic and Environmental Impacts of Platoon Trucks on Pavements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Can Rubberized Asphalt Pavements Alleviate Waste Tire Problems in Puer...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Framing to reduce present bias in infrastructure design intentions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Impact of New Generation Wide-Base Tires on Fuel Consumption
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A mechanistic and economic analysis of two-lift concrete pavements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Integration of life cycle assessment into planning and project deliver...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Combined life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis for the Il...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Combined Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Road Pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Estimation of environmental impacts of roads through life cycle assess...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) of Autonomous and Connected Truck (ACT) Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Life-Cycle Assessment of Using Sulfur-Extended Asphalt (SEA) in Paveme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Variable impact transportation (VIT) model for energy and environmenta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Carbon Footprint Estimation in Road Construction: La Abundancia–Floren...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Laboratory Characterization of Low–Rolling Resistance Danish Stone-Mat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Vehicle energy consumption and an environmental impact calculation mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Quantifying sustainable strategies for the construction of highway pav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Development of a Life-Cycle Assessment Tool to Quantify the Environmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub