Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2015

Analysis of Transportation Network Vulnerability under Flooding Disasters

Abstract

The transportation network plays an important role in people's daily activities. At the same time, serious flooding disasters frequently damage the transportation infrastructure and network around the world. The vulnerability of the transportation network has attracted much attention. Understanding transportation network vulnerability can enhance prevention and response capabilities during disaster events and emergency incidents. However, current methods for evaluating transportation network vulnerability still have many disadvantages. This research provides an introduction to analysis of transportation network vulnerability, followed by a review of research addressing transportation network vulnerability. A new accessibility-based methodology addressing travel modes was developed to evaluate transportation network vulnerability under flooding impacts. A case study based on data from Hillsborough County, Florida, was conducted to verify the established model. ArcGIS was utilized to identify the inundated segments. Different flooding scenarios were applied in CUBE to update the shortest travel time changes under flooding. Networkwide accessibility and vulnerability values under each scenario were then calculated. Finally, accessibility values calculated with the proposed accessibility-based method and the Hansen accessibility index method were compared. Comparison of results shows that the results of the two methods are quite close, but the proposed method yields normalized values, which make the results clearer and provide more levels of accessibility loss. Research results of the study can support decision making for urban transportation under flooding disasters resulting from extreme weather events and sea level rise.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jenelius E., Petersen T., and Mattsson L. G. Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 7, 2006, pp. 537–560.
2. Sarewitz D., Pielke R., and Keykhah M. Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective. Risk Analysis, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2003, pp. 805–810.
3. Sohn J. Evaluating the Significance of Highway Network Links under Flood Damage: An Accessibility Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2006, pp. 491–506.
4. Lleras-Echeverri G., and Sánchez-Silva M. Vulnerability Analysis of Highway Networks: Methodology and Case Study. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Transport, Vol. 147, No. 4, 2001, pp. 223–230.
5. Berdica K. An Introduction to Road Vulnerability: What Has Been Done, Is Done and Should Be Done. Transport Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2002, pp. 117–127.
6. Tu Y. F., Yang C., and Chen X. H. Analysis of Road Network Topology Vulnerability and Critical Links. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), Vol. 38, No. 3, 2010, pp. 364–367.
7. Lu Q.-C., Zhang J., Peng Z.-R., and Rahman A. B. M. S. Inter-City Travel Behavior Adaptation to Extreme Weather Events. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 148–153.
8. Hu X. H., and Liu Y. Traffic Vulnerability Analysis of the Road with Reserved Public Transportation Lane. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2006, pp. 128–133.
9. Bell M. G. H., Kanturska U., Schmöcker J. D., and Fonzone A. Attacker–Defender Models and Road Network Vulnerability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 366, No. 1872, 2008, pp. 1893–1906.
10. Hu Y. H., Wu Q. M., and Wu D. L. Topological Properties and Vulnerability Analysis of Spatial Urban Street Networks. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2009, pp. 69–76.
11. Han C. F., Liu L., and Zhang C. System Simulation on Urban Subway Transportation Network under Interference. System Simulation Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1–5.
12. Deng G. S., Wu P. J., and Tian W. The Research on Robustness and Vulnerability of Global Shipping Network. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2008, pp. 765–768.
13. Miller H. J. Measuring Space-Time Accessibility Benefits Within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1999, pp. 1–26.
14. Jones S. R. Accessibility Measures: A Literature Review. LR 967 Monograph. U.K. Transport and Road Research, Crowthorne, Berkshire, England, 1981.
15. Koopmans C., Groot W., Warffemius P., Annema J. A., and Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. Measuring Generalised Transport Costs as an Indicator of Accessibility Changes over Time. Transport Policy, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 154–159.
16. Chen A., Yang C., Kongsomsaksakul S., and Lee M. Network-Based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, pp. 241–256.
17. Taylor M. A. P., Sekhar S. V. C., and D'Este G. M. Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 6, No. 3–4, 2006, pp. 267–291.
18. Lu Q.-C., and Peng Z.-R. Vulnerability Analysis of Transportation Network Under Scenarios of Sea Level Rise. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2263, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 174–181.
19. Nokkala M., Mitsakis E., and Stamos I. Cross-Modal Substitutability in European Transport System to Mitigate the Impact of Extreme Weather and Natural Disasters. Management of Weather Events in Transport System (MOW-IT), 2014. http://www.mowe-it.eu/wordpress/deliverables. Accessed Oct. 28, 2014.
20. Bhat C., Handy S., Kockelman K., Mahmassani H., Chen Q., and Weston L. Urban Accessibility Index: Literature Review. Publication TX-01/7-4938-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex., 2000.
21. Hansen W. G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1959, pp. 73–76.
22. Wikipedia. Tampa, Florida. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampa,_Florida. Accessed Oct. 24, 2014.
23. UK Media Said That the Future Sea Level Will Rise 0.6 m in 70 Years. Chinese website (in Chinese). photo.huanqiu.com/dailypicture/2013-12/2720988.html. Accessed May 30, 2014.
24. PhoenixNet. The West Side of the Antarctic Ice Sheet May Collapse and the Sea Levels would Rise by Three or Four Meters. snews.ifeng.com/a/20140514/40287215_0.shtml. Accessed May 30, 2014.
25. Titus J. G., and Narayanan V. K. The Probability of Sea Level Rise. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.
26. Lu Q.-C., Peng Z.-R., and Du R. Economic Analysis of Impacts of Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategies in Transportation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2273, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 54–61.
27. Lu Q.-C., Peng Z.-R., Zhang L., and Wang Z. Economic Analysis of Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Strategies in Transportation Considering Spatial Autocorrelation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2014, pp. 87–94.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xian-Zhe Chen
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, 101 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700.
Qing-Chang Lu
School of Naval Architecture and Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, A304 Ruth Mulan Chu Chao Building, Shanghai 200240, China.
Zhong-Ren Peng
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Design, Construction, and Planning, University of Florida, P.O. Box 115706, Gainesville, FL 32611-5706.
John Eugene Ash
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, 101 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700.

Notes

The Standing Committee on Critical Transportation Infrastructure Protection peer-reviewed this paper.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 452

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 45

  1. Resilience for freight transportation systems to disruptive events: a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Transportation network resilience response to the spatial feature of h...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Identification and prioritization of multidimensional resilience facto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How Does Flooding Influence Intra-Urban Mobility? The Case of Accra
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Identification of Key Nodes in Comprehensive Transportation Network: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Vulnerability Analysis of Bus Network Based on Land-Use Type of Bus St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Rail Transit in Face of Disruptions:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Gradual cooperative coverage models for optimally locating rain gauges...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Measuring Resilience to Sea-Level Rise for Critical Infrastructure Sys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Modest flooding can trigger catastrophic road network collapse due to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A Systematic Review: To Increase Transportation Infrastructure Resilie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Effect of Social Vulnerability on Taxi Trip Times during Hurricane San...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Flood impact on urban roads and commuting: A case study of Wuhan, Chin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. An innovative approach to assess the impact of urban flooding: Modelin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Developing Public Health Emergency Response Leaders in Incident Manage...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Static and dynamic resilience assessment for sustainable urban transpo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Vulnerability Analysis of Geographical Railway Network under Geologica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Evaluating impacts of coastal flooding on the transportation system us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Road-reconstruction after multi-locational flooding in multi-agent dee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Strategies to Enhance the Resilience of an Urban Rail Transit Network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Analysis of Travel Behavior Under Flooding Condition Based on Probe Da...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Railway vulnerability and resilience
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Infrastructure-based transportation network vulnerability modeling and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Vulnerability patterns of road network to extreme floods based on acce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The effect of attacks on the railway network of Hungary
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. An efficient dynamic route optimization for urban flooding evacuation ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Measuring the dynamic evolution of road network vulnerability to flood...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Network Characteristics and Vulnerability Analysis of Chinese Railway ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. An integrated approach to modeling the impact of floods on emergency s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Evaluation and prediction of transportation resilience under extreme w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Accessibility and Transportation Equity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Game Approach to Vulnerability Analysis of Evacuation Highway Networks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Modeling the Impact of Spatial Correlations of Road Failures on Travel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Vulnerability of Transport Networks to Multi-Scenario Flooding and Opt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Network within Multi-Moda...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Vulnerability Analysis of Intercity Multimode Transportation Networks;...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Adaptive Capacity Planning Formulation for Infrastructure Networks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Investigating the impact of river floods on travel demand based on an ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Flood Risk Assessments of Transportation Networks Utilizing Depth-Disr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. A station-based rail transit network vulnerability measure considering...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Serviceability Methods
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Accessibility Methods
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Adaptive Planning for Transportation Corridors Threatened by Sea Level...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub