Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 28, 2019

Walking Access to Transit Stations: Evaluating Barriers with Stated Preference

Abstract

The last-mile problem refers to challenges that travelers experience in accessing transit stations from their activity locations. The objective of this study was to find the contributing factors that reduced people's propensity to walk and take transit. A stated preference study was conducted in the Chicago, Illinois, area with an online survey composed of questions based on the actual travel experience of the respondents. The data were used to estimate a logit choice model. The findings showed that access time, safety from crime, and sidewalk availability were important factors that influenced people's choice to walk to transit. The model was used to estimate time-based values associated with reduction in crime and sidewalk availability. The study also estimated the propensity to walk and use transit for a representative resident in each tract of the Chicago metropolitan area. These values were then used to identify census tracts where acute to minimal barriers to walking to transit existed. In addition to suburban areas that were not well suited for walking to transit, the results identified areas that were well served by transit but had other barriers that inhibited walking access to transit.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Puentes R. Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America. Missed Opportunity Series, No. 4, Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 1–63.
2. Santos A., McGuckin N., Nakamoto H. Y., Gray D., and Liss S. Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Technical report, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
3. Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, Alta Consulting, CALSTART, and Intrago Mobility Services. Maximizing Mobility in Los Angeles: First and Last Mile Strategies. Technical report 1-143, Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, Calif., 2009.
4. Wang H. Approximating the Performance of a Last Mile Transportation System. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2012.
5. Deka D., and DiPetrillo S. An Assessment of “Last Mile” Shuttles in New Jersey. Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., 2012.
6. Cheng S.F., Nguyen D.T., and Lau H.C. A Mechanism for Organizing Last-Mile Service Using Non-Dedicated Fleet. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences, Vol. 2, IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 85–89.
7. Tilahun N., Thakuriah P., and Keita Y.M. Factors Determining Transit Access by Car-Owners: Implications for Intermodal Passenger Transportation Planning. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
8. Tilahun N., Li M., Thakuriah P., and Keita Y.M. Transit Use and the Work Commute: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Urban Densities, Last Mile Problems, and Personal Constraints on Mode Choice. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
9. Brons M., Givoni M., and Rietveld P. Access to Railway Stations and Its Potential in Increasing Rail Use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2009, pp. 136–149.
10. Cervero R., Round A., Goldman T., and Wu K.L. Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the Bart System. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Berkeley, Calif., 1995.
11. Daniels R., and Mulley C. Explaining Walking Distance to Public Transport: The Dominance of Public Transport Supply. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011.
12. Ker I., and Ginn S. Myths and Realities in Walkable Catchments: The Case of Walking and Transit. Road and Transport Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2003, pp. 69–80.
13. Loutzenheiser D. R. Pedestrian Access to Transit: Model of Walk Trips and Their Design and Urban Form Determinants Around Bay Area Rapid Transit Stations. In Transportation Research Record 1604, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 40–49.
14. Cervero R. Walk-and-Ride: Factors Influencing Pedestrian Access to Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7 No. 3 2001, pp. 1–23.
15. Park S. Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station. ProQuest, Ann Arbor, Mich., 2008.
16. Hess P.M., Moudon A.V., and Matlick J.M. Pedestrian Safety and Transit Corridors. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, 2004, pp. 73–93.
17. Kim S., Ulfarsson G.F., and Hennessy J.T. Analysis of Light Rail Rider Travel Behavior: Impacts of Individual, Built Environment, and Crime Characteristics on Transit Access. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2007, pp. 511–522.
18. Walton D., and Sunseri S. Factors Influencing the Decision to Drive or Walk Short Distances to Public Transport Facilities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2010, pp. 212–226.
19. Olszewski P., and Wibowo S.S. Using Equivalent Walking Distance to Assess Pedestrian Accessibility to Transit Stations in Singapore. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 38–45.
20. Dieleman F.M., Dijst M., and Burghouwt G. Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-Level Household Attributes and Residential Context. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 507–527.
21. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–114.
22. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265–294.
23. Frank L., Bradley M., Kavage S., Chapman J., and Lawton T.K. Urban Form, Travel Time, and Cost Relationships with Tour Complexity and Mode Choice. Transportation, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2008, pp. 37–54.
24. City of Chicago. City of Chicago Data Portal. Accessed Jan. 2014. http://data.cityofchicago.org.
25. Rynkiewicz S. Illinois Crime Rates. Data compiled by the Illinois State Police, Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Chicago Tribune, May 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 28, 2019
Issue published: January 2015

Rights and permissions

© 2015 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nebiyou Tilahun
Department of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 412 South Peoria Street, Suite 254, Chicago, IL 60607.
Moyin Li
Department of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 412 South Peoria Street, Suite 254, Chicago, IL 60607.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 234

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 28

  1. Walkable and Safe Route to Transit for Pedestrians in Greater Montréal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. First and last mile travel mode choice: A systematic review of the emp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Barriers Associated with the First/Last Mile Trip and Solutions to Bri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Assessment of the First-and-Last-Mile Problem in Underserved Communiti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Enhancing station level Direct-Demand models with Multi-Scalar accessi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Introduction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Pedestrians’ Route Choice and the Street-Scale Built Environment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Application: Simulation Model of Pedestrian Flows in the Re-design of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. “It's annoying, confusing, and it's irritating”: Lived expertise for e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Assessment of pedestrian infrastructures of road transport: A case stu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Mapping User Experiences around Transit Stops Using Computer Vision Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Last mile commute: An integral sustainability component for passengers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Mode Choice between Bus and Bike-Sharing for the Last-Mile Connection ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. The role of household modality style in first and last mile travel mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Planning for Suitable Walk-Access Infrastructure Components in Various...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Simulating the effects of redesigned street-scale built environments o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Disentangling the behavioural side of the first and last mile problem:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Understanding accessibility through public transport users' experience...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The impact of the street-scale built environment on pedestrian metro s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Selection of intervention areas for improving travel condition of walk...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Exploring the non-linear associations between spatial attributes and w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. An evaluation of in-service infrastructural facilities of walk-access ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Exploring how perceptive differences impact the current public transpo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Explaining subjective perceptions of public spaces as a function of th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. The Role of Accessibility to Public Transport and Quality of Walking E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Plan pedestrian friendly environments around subway stations: lessons ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Transit use and the work commute: Analyzing the role of last mile issu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub