Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2016

Dynamic Vehicle–Track Model to Study the Effects of Track Geometry and Vehicle–Track Interaction on Concrete Tie Rail Seat Load Environment

Abstract

Rail seat deterioration (RSD) of concrete ties is manifested by the loss of concrete material in the rail seat area supporting the rail. This failure mode can lead to track that performs poorly and, in extreme cases, can result in the loss of rail clip hold down, reverse rail cant, and rail rollover derailments. This paper describes the use of a multibody vehicle–track dynamics model developed to study the load environment of concrete tie rail seats, specifically addressing the failure mode of RSD. Vehicle–track interaction simulations were conducted to determine the effect of track geometry perturbations on the overall load environment. Various types and magnitudes of track geometry perturbations, including combinations of surface (vertical) and alignment (lateral) perturbations were considered. Fastening system parameters such as clip hold-down force, tie pad stiffness, and broken insulator conditions were also considered. Results of these simulations suggest that concrete crushing, a hypothesized mechanism of RSD, is unlikely in realistic revenue service conditions. Under the load environments considered, the results augment support for an abrasion-related mechanism of RSD that may be more dependent on tonnage and infiltration of fine particles in the rail seat, two factors not addressed in this model. Results from in-track testing are also presented to compare model outputs with measured in-track forces under artificial track geometry perturbations installed at the Transportation Technology Center’s Facility for Accelerated Service Testing. More broadly, the use of this model to explore the effects of vehicle track interaction on tie and fastener load environment is also discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad Accident Brief, Accident No. DCA-05-FR-010 (NTSB/RAB-06/03). October 18, 2006. http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/RAB0603.pdf.
2. Zeman J. C., Edwards J. R., Barkan C. P. L., and Lange D. A. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of Concrete Ties in North America. Proc., 9th International Heavy Haul Conference, Shanghai, China, 2009, pp. 270–278.
3. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association. Ties. In Manual for Railway Engineering, Lanham, Md., 2012.
4. Marquis B. P., Muhlanger M., and Jeong D. Y. Effect of Wheel/Rail Loads on Concrete Tie Stresses and Rail Rollover. Proc., ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference, Minneapolis, Minn., 2011.
5. Reiff R., Walker R., Schreiber P., Wilson N., and Thompson H. Assessment of Rail Seat Abrasion Patterns and Environment. Federal Railroad Administration Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-12/07. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2012.
6. Chen Z., Shin M., and Andrawes B. Finite Element Modeling of the Fastening Systems and Concrete Sleepers in North America. Proc., 2013 International Heavy Haul Association Conference, New Delhi, India, Feb. 2013.
7. Tangtragulwong P., Fry G., Reiff R., and Davis D. Analysis of Tie Plate Cracking Under Heavy Axle Loads. In Technology Digest TD-09-015. Association of American Railroads, Transportation Technology Center, Pueblo, Colo., June 2009.
8. Rapp C. J., Dersch M. S., Edwards J. R., Barkan C. P. L., Wilson B., and Mediavilla J. Measuring Concrete Crosstie Rail Seat Pressure Distribution with Matrix Based Tactile Surface Sensors. Proc., AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association) Annual Conference, Chicago, Ill., Sept., 2012.
9. Greve M., Dersch M. S., Edwards J. R., Barkan C. P. L., Mediavilla J., and Wilson B. Analysis of the Relationship between Rail Seat Load Distribution and Rail Seat Deterioration in Concrete Crossties. Proc., 2014 Joint Rail Conference, Colorado Springs, Colo., April 2–4, 2014.
10. Greve M., Dersch M. S., Edwards J. R., Barkan C. P. L., Thompson H., Sussmann T., and McHenry M. Examination of the Effect of Concrete Crosstie Rail Seat Deterioration on Rail Seat Load Distribution. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
11. Iwnicki S. The Manchester Benchmarks for Rail Vehicle Simulation. Supplement to Vehicle Systems Dynamics, Vol. 31, 1999.
12. Steffens D., and Murray M. Establishing Meaningful Results from Models of Railway Track Dynamic Behavior. Proc., 8th International Heavy Haul Association Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. June, 2005.
13. Blader F. B., Elkins J. A., Wilson N. G., and Klauser P. E. Development and Validation of a General Rail Vehicle Dynamics Simulation (NUCARS). Proc., ASME-IEEE Joint Railway Conference, Philadelphia, Pa., April 1989, pp. 39–46.
14. Elkins J. A. Experimental Validation of Multi-Body Programs. IMechE Seminar, London, 1992.
15. Wilson N. G., and Gurule S. Application of Instrumented Wheelset Technology to Transit System Research and Development. Proc., ASME-IEEE Joint Railroad Conference, Boston, Mass., March 1997.
16. Elkins J. A., Brickles B., Wilson N., Singh S., and Wu H. Track Structure Modelling with NUCARS™ and Its Validation. Proc., 17th IAVSD Symposium, Lyngby, Denmark, Aug. 2001.
17. Shu X., Wilson N., Sasaoka C., and Elkins J. Development of a Real-Time Wheel/Rail Contact Model in NUCARS™ and Application to Diamond Crossing and Turnout Design Simulations. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, Vol. 44, Supplement 1, 2006.
18. Li D., Wu H., Elkins J., and Singh S. Characterization of Track Stiffness and Damping Parameters. AAR Report R-930. Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C., May 1999.
19. McHenry M., and LoPresti J. Tie and Fastener System Gage Restraint Performance at FAST. In Technology Digest TD-15-013. Association of American Railroads, Transportation Technology Center, Inc., Pueblo, Colo., May 2015.
20. Office of Railroad Safety. Track and Rail and Infrastructure Integrity Compliance Manual: Volume II, Chapter I. In Track Safety Standards Classes 1 Through 5. Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Jan. 2014.
21. McHenry M. T., Brown M., LoPresti J., Rose J., and Souleyrette R. Use of Matrix-Based Tactile Surface Sensors to Assess Fine-Scale Ballast–Tie Interface Pressure Distribution in Railroad Track. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2476, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 23–31.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mike McHenry
Transportation Technology Center, Inc., 55500 DOT Road, Pueblo, CO 81001
Adam Klopp
Transportation Technology Center, Inc., 55500 DOT Road, Pueblo, CO 81001
Hugh B. Thompson, II
Office of Research, Development, and Technology, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590

Notes

M. McHenry, mike_mchenry@aar.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 24

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Experimental investigation on loading pattern of railway concrete slab...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub