Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2016

Safety Effects of Street Illuminance at Urban Signalized Intersections in Florida

Abstract

Nighttime crashes are overrepresented on United States and state roadway systems. Nighttime safety at signalized intersections in urban areas receives more attention because of frequent and serious vehicle-to-vehicle, vehicle-to-pedestrian, and vehicle-to-bicyclist traffic conflicts at night. Street illumination has proved to be an effective countermeasure to increase visibility at intersections and to reduce nighttime crashes. However, the safety effects of illuminance at urban signalized intersections are not well documented. This study investigated the impacts of illuminance on nighttime crash occurrence and nighttime crash injury severity at urban signalized intersections. Illuminance data and crash data for a sample of 91 signalized intersections were collected from the Tampa Bay region in Florida. The negative binomial model and the probit model were developed to examine the safety effects of intersection illuminance in terms of crash frequency and the risk of fatality and severe injury, respectively. The models showed that an increase in intersection illuminance from low (<0.2 fc) to medium (≥0.2 fc and <1.1 fc) could reduce nighttime crash frequency and night-to-day crash ratios by approximately 50%. When illuminance was kept at 0.9 fc or higher, the risk of fatality and severe injury decreased significantly, especially in crashes that involved pedestrians and bicycles, head-on crashes, and angle crashes.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2013. A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. DOT HS 812 139. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2015. www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812139.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2015.
2. Monsere C. M., and Fischer E. L. Safety Effects of Reducing Freeway Illumination for Energy Conservation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1773–1780.
3. NHTSA. Fatality Analysis Reporting System. U.S. Department of Transportation. www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/QueryTool/QuerySection/Report.aspx. Accessed Jan. 1, 2015.
4. American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting (RP-8-00). Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York, 2000.
5. Antonucci N. D., Hardy K. K., Slack K. L., Pfefer R., and Neuman T. R. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 12: A Guide for Reducing Collisions at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
6. Roadway Lighting Design Guide. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2011.
7. Elvik R. Meta-Analysis of Evaluations of Public Lighting as Accident Countermeasure. In Transportation Research Record 1485, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 112–123.
8. Preston H., and Schoenecker T. Safety Impact of Street Lighting at Isolated Rural Intersections. MN/RC-1999-17. Office of Research Administration, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 1999. www.lrrb.org/PDF/199917.pdf. Assessed July 15, 2015.
9. Isebrands H. N., Hallmark S. L., Hans Z., McDonald T., Preston H., and Storm R. Safety Impacts of Street Lighting at Isolated Rural Intersections—Part II. MN/RC-2006-35. Research Services Division, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2006. www.lrrb.org/media/reports/200635.pdf. Assessed June 27, 2015.
10. Bruneau J.-F., and Morin D. Standard and Nonstandard Roadway Lighting Compared with Darkness at Rural Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1918, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 116–122.
11. Kim D. G., and Washington S. The Significance of Endogeneity Problems in Crash Models: An Examination of Left-Turn Lanes in Intersection Crash Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1094–1100.
12. Bullough J. D., Donnell E. T., and Rea M. S. To Illuminate or Not to Illuminate: Roadway Lighting As It Affects Traffic Safety at Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 65–77.
13. Nabavi Niaki M. S., Saunier N., Miranda-Moreno L. F., Amador L., and Bruneau J.-F. Method for Road Lighting Audit and Safety Screening at Urban Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2458, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 27–36.
14. Edwards C. J. Lighting Levels for Isolated Intersections Leading to Safety Improvements. MnDOT 2015-05. University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/170427. Assessed June 16, 2015.
15. Bhagavathula R., Gibbons R. B., and Edwards C. J. Relationship Between Roadway Illuminance Level and Nighttime Rural Intersection Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2485, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 8–15.
16. Johnson M., Fabregas A., Wang Z., Katkoori S., and Lin P. S. Embedded System Design of an Advanced Illumination Measurement System for Highways. Proceedings of 8th Annual IEEE Systems Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. CFP14SYT-POD. 2014, pp. 579–586. http://toc.proceedings.com/22270webtoc.pdf.
17. Wang X., Abdel-Aty M., Nevarez A., and Santos J. B. Investigation of Safety Influence Area for Four-Legged Signalized Intersections: Nationwide Survey and Empirical Inquiry. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 86–95.
18. Donnell E. T., Porter R. J., and Shankar V. N. A Framework for Estimating the Safety Effects of Roadway Lighting at Intersections. Safety Science, Vol. 48, No. 10, 2010, pp. 1436–1444.
19. Williams R. Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects. Stata Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2012, pp. 308–331.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fulu Wei
School of Transportation Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, 5088 Xincheng Avenue, Changchun, Jilin 130000, China
Zhenyu Wang
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT 100, Tampa, FL 33620
Pei-Sung Lin
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT 100, Tampa, FL 33620
Ping P. Hsu
Florida Department of Transportation, 11201 North Malcolm McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL 33612-6403
Seckin Ozkul
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT 100, Tampa, FL 33620
Jason Jackman
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT 100, Tampa, FL 33620
Michael Bato
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT 100, Tampa, FL 33620

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 117

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Modelling crash severity outcomes for low speed urban roads using back...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Modeling effects of roadway lighting photometric criteria on nighttime...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Development of crash modification factors for roadway illuminance: A m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Nighttime safety evaluation for signalized intersections at the signal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Safety effects of street lighting on roadway segments: Development of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub