Trend-Breaking Influences of Built Form on Travel in UK Cities: Evidence from New Quantifications of Within- and Between-Built-Form Variations
Abstract
Using a consistent time series of 11 years (1,137,259 sample trips, 2002 to 2012) and all main variables from the UK National Travel Survey, this paper develops a novel structural equation model (SEM) with random intercepts to gain new insights into the influences of built-form characteristics on travel behavior. With simultaneous modeling of car ownership as an endogenous variable in determining influences on travel outcomes and allowing SEM intercepts to vary across built-form categories, one controls for car ownership endogeneity while measuring within- and between-built-form variations through incorporating random intercepts in the model. The new models unambiguously decompose the self-selection and spatial sorting of household effects from the influence of the built-form characteristics. This research further investigates trend-breaking influences by generating pre-2007 and post-2007 model outputs with a multi-time-period structure. The new quantifications are built on more-robust statistical theories than hitherto and, thus, imply significant implications on how to interpret the effect of recent transformations in UK inner cities. The method can also be used to produce a regular and timely update on any shifts in the influences on travel and provide feedback for land use planning and integrated built-form and transport interventions.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Charlene R., and Fox J. Evidence Review of Car Traffic Levels in Britain: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 2014.
2. Boarnet M. G. The Built Environment and Physical Activity: Empirical Methods and Data Resources. Prepared for Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use, 2004.
3. Cao X., Mokhtarian P. L., and Handy S. L. Cross-Sectional and Quasi-Panel Explorations of the Connection Between the Built Environment and Auto Ownership. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 830–847.
4. de Abreu e Silva J., Morency C., and Goulias K. G. Using Structural Equations Modeling to Unravel the Influence of Land Use Patterns on Travel Behavior of Workers in Montreal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1252–1264.
5. Handy S. L., Cao X., and Mokhtarian P. Correlation or Causality Between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2005, pp. 427–444.
6. Giuliano G., and Dargay J. Car Ownership, Travel, and Land Use: A Comparison of the U.S. and Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2006, pp. 106–124.
7. de Abreu e Silva J., Golob T. F., and Goulias K. G. Effects of Land Use Characteristics on Residence and Employment Location and Travel Behavior of Urban Adult Workers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 121–131.
8. Van Acker V., Witlox F., and van Wee B. The Effects of the Land Use System on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2007, pp. 331–353.
9. Van Acker V., Mokhtarian P. L., and Witlox F. Car Availability Explained by the Structural Relationships Between Lifestyles, Residential Location, and Underlying Residential and Travel Attitudes. Transport Policy, Vol. 35, 2014, pp. 88–99.
10. Mokhtarian P. L., and Cao X. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: A Focus on Methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, pp. 204–228.
11. Cao X., Mokhtarian P. L., and Handy S. L. Do Changes in Neighborhood Characteristics Lead to Changes in Travel Behavior? A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2007, pp. 535–556.
12. Cao X., Mokhtarian P. L., and Handy S. L. The Relationship Between the Built Environment and Nonwork Travel: A Case Study of Northern California. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2009, pp. 548–559.
13. Gao S., Mokhtarian P. L., and Johnston R. A. Exploring the Connections Among Job Accessibility, Employment, Income, and Auto Ownership Using Structural Equation Modeling. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2007, pp. 341–356.
14. Bohte W., Maat K., and van Wee B. Measuring Attitudes in Research on Residential Self-Selection and Travel Behaviour: A Review of Theories and Empirical Research. Transport Reviews, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2009, pp. 325–357.
15. Cervero R., and Murakami J. Effects of Built Environments on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Evidence from 370 U.S. Urbanized Areas. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2010, pp. 400–418.
16. Handy S. L., Cao X., and Mokhtarian P. L. Self-Selection in the Relationship Between the Built Environment and Walking: Evidence from Northern California. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2006, pp. 55–74.
17. Jahanshahi K., Jin Y., and Williams I. Direct and Indirect Influences on Employed Adults’ Travel in the UK: New Insights from the National Travel Survey Data 2002–2010. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 80, 2015, pp. 288–306.
18. Bhat C. R., and Gossen R. A Mixed Multinomial Logit Model Analysis of Weekend Recreational Episode Type Choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2004, pp. 767–787.
19. Spissu E., Pinjari A. R., Bhat C. R., Pendyala R. M., and Axhausen K. W. An Analysis of Weekly Out-of-Home Discretionary Activity Participation and Time-Use Behavior. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2009, pp. 483–510.
20. Cho S.-J., Preacher K. J., and Bottge B. A. Detecting Intervention Effects in a Cluster-Randomized Design Using Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling for Binary Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2015.
21. Dunn E. C., Masyn K. E., Jones S. M., Subramanian S. V., and Koenen K. C. Measuring Psychosocial Environments Using Individual Responses: An Application of Multilevel Factor Analysis to Examining Students in Schools. Prevention Science, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2015, pp. 718–733.
22. Marsh H. W., Lüdtke O., Robitzsch A., Trautwein U., Asparouhov T., Muthén B., and Nagengast B. Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2009, pp. 764–802.
23. Morin A. J. S., Marsh H. W., Nagengast B., and Scalas L. F. Doubly Latent Multilevel Analyses of Classroom Climate: An Illustration. Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2015, pp. 143–167.
24. Jahanshahi K., Williams I., and Hao X. Understanding Travel Behaviour and Factors Affecting Trip Rates. Presented at European Transport Conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, 2009.
25. Jahanshahi K., Jin Y., and Williams I. Analyzing Sources of Variability in Travel Time Use in a Combined Framework Using Extended Structural Equation Models and UK National Travel Survey Data. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
26. Jahanshahi K., and Jin Y. The Built Environment Typologies in the UK and Their Influences on Travel Behaviour: New Evidence Through Latent Categorisation in Structural Equation Modelling. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016, pp. 59–77.
27. Jin Y., Williams I., and Shahkarami M. A New Land Use and Transport Interaction Model for London and Its Surrounding Regions. European Transport Forum, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2002.
28. Research into Changing Trip Rates over Time and Implications for the National Trip End Model: Final Report. WSP Development and Transportation, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2009.
29. Muthén B. A General Structural Equation Model with Dichotomous, Ordered Categorical, and Continuous Latent Variable Indicators. Psychometrika, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1984, pp. 115–132.
30. Muthén B., and Asparouhov T. Growth Mixture Analysis: Models with Non-Gaussian Random Effects. Advances in Longitudinal Data Analysis, 2007, pp. 143–165.
31. Morris S., Humphrey A., Pickering K., Tipping S., Templeton I., and Hurn J. National Travel Survey 2013 Technical Report. UK Department for Transport, 2014.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 35
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 5
- Public transport equity in Shenyang: Using structural equation modelli...
- Identification and mapping of spatial variations in travel choices thr...
- The Current Status of Research in the Field of the Rural Built Environ...
- Effects of rural built environment on travel-related CO2 emissions con...
- Examining the effects of the built environment and residential self-se...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
