Handling Intrahousehold Correlations in Modeling Travel: Comparison of Hierarchical Models and Marginal Models
Abstract
In this study, the necessity for treating intrahousehold correlation was investigated by analyzing two travel behavior indexes, travel time and travel distance, for three important travel motivations (commuting, shopping, and leisure). Data stemming from the 2010 Belgian National Household Travel Survey were used in the analysis. Two model approaches that accommodated intrahousehold correlation were compared, namely, the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) and the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model. Both model approaches showed that high levels of intrahousehold correlation were present, and therefore the use of models that took into account intrahousehold correlation was strongly recommended. Results indicated that this requirement was the most urgent for noncommuting trips. Moreover, the results showed that the GLMM and the GEE model yielded comparable estimates in the case of normally distributed data. Furthermore, evidence was provided that the more the estimates of the intrahousehold correlation provided by the two approaches differed, the less the homogeneity of the parameters was ensured. In this regard, if one has to choose between the GLMM and the GEE model, the negative consequences of choosing an inappropriate covariance model in the case of GLMM especially favor the selection of the GEE model. Further research is needed to compare the two approaches in the context of nonnormally distributed travel behavior data.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Fox M. Transport Planning and the Human Activity Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1995, pp. 105–116.
2. Hägerstrand T. What About People in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1970, pp. 7–21.
3. Jones P. M., Dix M. C., Clarke M. I., and Heggie I. G. Understanding Travel Behavior. Gower, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1983.
4. Pendyala R. M., and Goulias K. G. Time Use and Activity Perspectives in Travel Behavior Research. Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1–4.
5. Rasouli S., and Timmermans H. Activity-Based Models of Travel Demand: Promises, Progress, and Prospects. International Journal of Urban Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2014, pp. 31–60.
6. Bottai M., Salvati N., and Orsini N. Multilevel Models for Analyzing People’s Daily Movement Behavior. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006, pp. 97–108.
7. Giuliano G., and Narayan D. Another Look at Travel Patterns and Urban Form: The US and Great Britain. Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 11, 2003, pp. 2295–2312.
8. Goulias K. G. Multilevel Analysis of Daily Time Use and Time Allocation to Activity Types Accounting for Complex Covariance Structures Using Correlated Random Effects. Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2002, pp. 31–48.
9. Maat K., and Timmermans H. J. P. A Causal Model Relating Urban Form with Daily Travel Distance Through Activity/Travel Decisions. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2009, pp. 115–134.
10. Mercado R., and Páez A. Determinants of Distance Traveled with a Focus on the Elderly: A Multilevel Analysis in the Hamilton CMA, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2009, pp. 65–76.
11. Van Acker V., Witlox F., and van Wee B. The Effects of the Land Use System on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2007, pp. 331–353.
12. Yang D., Timmermans H., and Grigolon A. Exploring Heterogeneity in Travel Time Expenditure of Aging Populations in the Netherlands: Results of a CHAID Analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 33, 2013, pp. 170–179.
13. Elldér E. Residential Location and Daily Travel Distances: The Influence of Trip Purpose. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 34, 2014, pp. 121–130.
14. Banerjee A., Ye X., and Pendyala R. Understanding Travel Time Expenditures Around the World: Exploring the Notion of a Travel Time Frontier. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2007, pp. 51–65.
15. Cools M., Moons E., and Wets G. Assessing the Impact of Public Holidays on Travel Time Expenditure: Differentiation by Trip Motive. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2157, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 29–37.
16. Golob T. F. The Dynamics of Household Travel Time Expenditures and Car Ownership Decisions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1990, pp. 443–463.
17. van Wee B., Rietveld P., and Meurs H. Is Average Daily Travel Time Expenditure Constant? In Search of Explanations for an Increase in Average Travel Time. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2006, pp. 109–122.
18. Bolger N., Davis A., and Rafaeli E. Diary Methods: Capturing Life as It Is Lived. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2003, pp. 579–616.
19. Snellen D., Borgers A., and Timmermans H. Urban Form, Road Network Type, and Mode Choice for Frequently Conducted Activities: A Multilevel Analysis Using Quasi-Experimental Design Data. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2002, pp. 1207–1220.
20. Bhat C. R. A Multi-Level Cross-Classified Model for Discrete Response Variables. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2000, pp. 567–582.
21. Bhat C. R., and Pendyala R. M. Modeling Intrahousehold Interactions and Group Decision-Making. Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2005, pp. 443–448.
22. Ho C., and Mulley C. Intrahousehold Interactions in Transport Research: A Review. Transport Reviews, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2015, pp. 33–55.
23. Kang H., and Scott D. Impact of Different Criteria for Identifying Intrahousehold Interactions: A Case Study of Household Time Allocation. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2011, pp. 81–99.
24. Zhao X., Guan H., and Gong L. Modeling Correlation of Family Holiday Activities Based on Structural Equation Model. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2011, pp. 85–90.
25. Bhat C., and Zhao H. The Spatial Analysis of Activity Stop Generation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2002, pp. 557–575.
26. Schwanen T., and Dijst M. Travel-Time Ratios for Visits to the Workplace: The Relationship Between Commuting Time and Work Duration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2002, pp. 573–592.
27. Abdel-Aty M., and Abdalla F. Understanding Drivers’ Route Choice Under Long-Term Pretrip and Short-Term En Route Traffic Information Using Generalized Estimating Equations. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6, 2004, pp. 777–786.
28. Heinen E., Maat K., and van Wee B. Day-to-Day Choice to Commute or Not by Bicycle. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2230, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 9–18.
29. Hubbard A. E., Ahern J., Fleischer N. L., Van der Laan M., Lippman S. A., Jewell N., Bruckner T., and Satariano W. A. To GEE or Not to GEE: Comparing Population Average and Mixed Models for Estimating the Associations Between Neighborhood Risk Factors and Health. Epidemiology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, pp. 467–474.
30. Cornelis E., Hubert M., Hunyen P., Lebrun K., Patriarche G., De Witte A., Creemers L., Declercq K., Janssens D., Castaigne M., Hollaert L., and Walle F. Belgian Daily Mobility (BELDAM): Enquête sur la Mobilité Quotidienne des Belges. Final Report. SPF Mobilité et Transports, Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
31. Zorn C. J. W. Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2001, pp. 470–490.
32. Molenberghs G., and Verbeke G. Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York, 2005.
33. Schukken Y. H., Grohn Y. T., McDermott B., and McDermott J. J. Analysis of Correlated Discrete Observations: Background, Examples, and Solutions. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2003, pp. 223–240.
34. Fujii S., Kitamura R., and Kishizawa K. Analysis of Individuals’ Joint-Activity Engagement Using a Model System of Activity-Travel Behavior and Time Use. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 11–19.
35. Carrasco J.-A., and Miller E. J. The Social Dimension in Action: A Multilevel, Personal Networks Model of Social Activity Frequency Between Individuals. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009, pp. 90–104.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 24
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 4
- A longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 effects on the variability in ...
- Summary of crash-frequency and crash-severity models in highway safety
- Women’s morbid conditions are associated with decreased odds of live b...
- Learning curve estimation in medical devices and procedures: hierarchi...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
