Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2016

Self-Driving Vehicles: Determinants of Adoption and Conditions of Usage

Abstract

This study gathered empirical evidence on adoption patterns of self-driving vehicles, their likely use, and how that use might influence the amount of travel, mode choice, auto ownership, and other travel behavior decisions. Because self-driving vehicles were not yet on the market, a car technology acceptance model was applied to understand adoption and use. Researchers implemented a two-stage data collection effort. An online survey was conducted with 556 residents of metropolitan Austin, Texas, to determine intent to use. Four intent-to-use categories were determined: extremely unlikely, 18%; somewhat unlikely, 32%; somewhat likely, 36%; and extremely likely, 14%. Of those who indicated intent to use, qualitative interviews were conducted to ascertain the impact on their travel behavior. Most respondents would rather own a self-driving vehicle than use one such as Car2Go or Uber taxi. In addition, respondents reported that using a self-driving vehicle would make no change in where people would choose to live in Austin (80%), no change to their annual vehicle miles of travel (66%), and no change to the number of vehicles owned (55%).

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.
2. Regan M., Horberry T., and Stevens A. Modelling Acceptance of Driver Assistance Systems: Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimisation, Dorset Press, Dorchester, England, 2014, pp. 23–34.
3. Fischbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.
4. Davis F., Bagozzi R., and Warshaw P. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, Vol. 35, 1989, pp. 982–1003.
5. Turner M., Kitchenham B., Brereton P., Charters S., and Budgen D. Does the Technology Acceptance Model Predict Actual Use? A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 52, 2009, pp. 463–479.
6. Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G., and Davis F. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, 2003, pp. 425–478.
7. Osswald S., Wurhofer D., Trosterer S., Beck E., and Tscheligi M. Predicting Information Technology Usage in the Car: Towards a Car Technology Acceptance Model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012, pp. 51–58.
8. Mitsopoulos-Rubens E., and Regan M. Measuring Acceptability Through Questionnaires and Focus Groups. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimisation, Dorset Press, Dorchester, England, 2014.
9. Schoettle B., and Sivak M. A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., U.K., and Australia. Report UMTRI-2014-21. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, July 2014.
10. Kyriakidis M., Happee R., and de Winter J. C. F. Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents. Transport Research Part F, Vol. 32, 2015, pp. 127–140.
11. Shin J., Bhat C. R., Yoo D., Garikapati V. M., and Pendyala R. M. Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Vehicle Technology Options and Fuel Types. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
12. Brown B., Drew M., Erenguc C., Hill R., Schmith S., and Gangula B. 2014 Global Automotive Consumer Study: Exploring Consumers’ Mobility Choices and Transportation Decisions. Deloitte Consulting, New York, 2014.
14. Howard D., and Dai D. Public Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
15. Automotive Emerging Technologies Study Results. Power J. D. http://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/2014057_US%20_Auto_ET.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2015.
16. Schoettle B., and Sivak M. Potential Impact of Self-Driving Vehicles on Household Vehicle Demand and Usage. Report UMTRI-2015-3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Feb. 2015.
17. Harper C., Mangones S., Hendrickson C. T., and Samaras C. Bounding the Potential Increases in Vehicle Miles Traveled for the Non-Driving and Elderly Populations and People with Travel-Restrictive Medical Conditions in an Automated Vehicle Environment. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
18. Childress S., Nichols B., Charlton B., and Coe S. Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2493, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 99–106.
19. Levin M. W., and Boyles S. D. Effects of Autonomous Vehicle Ownership on Trip, Mode, and Route Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2493, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 29–38.
20. Fagnant D. J., Kockelman K. M., and Bansal P. Operations of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet for Austin, Texas, Market. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2536, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 98–106.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Johanna Zmud
Washington, D.C., Office, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System,1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20006
Ipek N. Sener
Austin Office, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 505 East Huntland Drive, Suite 455, Austin, TX 78752
Jason Wagner
Austin Office, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 505 East Huntland Drive, Suite 455, Austin, TX 78752

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 902

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 97

  1. Governance of automated vehicle in the urban transport system: Insight...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. University students’ adoption of mobility as a service with respect to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Ranking preferences towards adopting autonomous vehicles based on peer...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. UTAUT4-AV: An extension of the UTAUT model to study intention to use a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Comfort with varying levels of human supervision in self-driving cars:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Motivated to Use: Beliefs and Motivation Influencing the Acceptance an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A review on the factors influencing the adoption of new mobility techn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Autonomous vehicle impacts on travel-based activity and activity-based...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Building on the past to help prepare the workforce for the future with...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Who will adopt private automated vehicles and automated shuttle buses?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Willingness-to-pay for shared automated mobility using an adaptive cho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Humans vs, machines; motorcyclists and car drivers differ in their opi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Moving toward a More Sustainable Autonomous Mobility, Case of Heteroge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Trust Repair of Automated Driving System: A New In-Vehicle Communicati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. ATIAS: A Model for Understanding Intentions to Use AI Technology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Public discourse on automated vehicles in online discussion forums: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A strategic review approach on adoption of autonomous vehicles and its...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Understanding Autonomous Shuttle Adoption Intention: Predictive Power ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Let me drive you! The effect of change seeking and behavioral control ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Exploring “automobility engagement”: A predictor of shared, automated,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. How do perceptions of safety and car ownership importance affect auton...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The Attitudes towards Autonomous Vehicles in a Medium-Sized Academic-D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Factors Influencing Users’ Willingness to Adopt Connected and Autonomo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Determinants of purchase likelihood for partially and fully automated ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. People with more misconceptions about automated vehicles might be more...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. EVALUATION OF THE IMPACTS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES ON THE MOBILITY OF US...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Impacts of vehicle automation in public revenues and transport equity....
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Non-Driving Related tasks and journey types for future autonomous vehi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Rumors in the air? Exploring public misconceptions about automated veh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. “Baby, you can drive my car”: Psychological antecedents that drive con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. “Do I really need it?”: An explorative study of acceptance and usage o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Empirical evidence of bias in public acceptance of autonomous vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Consumer Preferences for Different Cav Technologies and Service Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Public Perspectives on Automated Vehicles in Online Discussion Forums:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF NEWSPAPER REPORTS ON CHANGES IN THE OBJECTIVE ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Accelerating the Race to Autonomous Cars – A Case Study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. University students’ perspectives on autonomous vehicle adoption: Adel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. How public interest and concerns about autonomous vehicles change over...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. A cross-country comparison of user experience of public autonomous tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Factors Affecting the Acceptance and Willingness-to-Pay of End-Users: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Industry 4.0 an empirical analysis of users’ intention in the automoti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. What affects drivers’ satisfaction with autonomous vehicles in differe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Autonomous vehicles between anticipation and apprehension: Investigati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. The politics of new driving technologies: Political ideology and auton...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Investigating consumer acceptance of autonomous technologies: the case...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. The Social Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. The Influence of Introducing Autonomous Vehicles on Conventional Trans...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Intelligent Vehicle Communication and Obstacle Detection Based on Mill...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. The societal dimension of the automated vehicles transition: Towards a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19 – How do ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Understanding the potential adoption of autonomous vehicles in China: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Brief Study and Review on the Next Revolutionary Autonomous Vehicle Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Willingness to Use Automated Vehicles: Results From a Large and Divers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  55. Autonomous Vehicle Shuttle in Smart City Testbed
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Qualitative Examination of Technology Acceptance in the Vehicle: Facto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Why travelers trust and accept self-driving cars: An empirical study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. A Strategic Review Approach on Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles and its...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. User Acceptance of Internet of Vehicles Services: Empirical Findings o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. A systematic literature review of the factors influencing the adoption...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Adoption and willingness to pay for autonomous vehicles: Attitudes and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Individual Predictors of Autonomous Vehicle Public Acceptance and Inte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Users’ Acceptance of Connected and Automated Shuttles for Tourism Purp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Driver Preference and Level of Trust Related to Real-Time Road Freezin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Towards a Cooperative Driver-Vehicle Interface: Enhancing Drivers' Per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Behavioural intention to use autonomous vehicles: Systematic review an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Attitudes towards privately-owned and shared autonomous vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. A Robust Re-configurable Quad-Rotor for One Engine Inoperative Conditi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Mobility Acceptance Factors of an Automated Shuttle Bus Last-Mile Serv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. How, and for whom, will activity patterns be modified by self-driving ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Social media marketing: Who is watching the watchers?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery in G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Potential health and well-being implications of autonomous vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. What we know and do not know about connected and autonomous vehicles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Perceived safety and attributed value as predictors of the intention t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Identifying latent mode-use propensity segments in an all-AV era
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Chipping away at uncertainty: intent to use self-driving vehicles and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Privately Owned Autonomous Vehicle Optimization Model Development and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Autonomous vehicles can be shared, but a feeling of ownership is impor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. How technology commitment affects mode choice for a self-driving shutt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. New Solutions in Sustainable Commuting—The Attitudes and Experience of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Modeling individuals’ willingness to share trips with strangers in an ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. How will automated vehicles shape users’ daily activities? Insights fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: A case study of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. A correlation analysis of information use, social networks and coopera...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Assessing public perception of self-driving cars
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Discussing the “positive utilities” of autonomous vehicles: will trave...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Activities while travelling? Travel time perception and travel time us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Self-driving Vehicles: Do Their Risks Outweigh Their Benefits?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Anticipating acceptance of emerging technologies using twitter: the ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub