Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2016

Weakening Obstacles to Transit Use: Changes in Relationships with Child Rearing and Automobile Access from 2000 to 2010

Abstract

Early indications of a significant generational change in travel behavior have raised hopes of robust growth in transit use in the immediate future, especially as the millennial generation comes of age. The eventual transition to family life and child rearing, however, has led to significant declines in the transit use rates of older-age cohorts. For high transit-use rates of millennials to be durable, the relationship between the presence of children and travel behavior must change. Despite lower rates of automobile ownership by millennials than by previous cohorts, automobile ownership is still widespread: increased attraction of choice riders is important for growth in transit use as well. This study looks for changes in the basic relationship between the presence of young children or automobile access and the probability of transit use from 2000 to 2010 on the basis of data from the decennial Travel Behavior Inventory by the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities in Minnesota. Pooled logistic regression models at both the trip and person level find that automobile access was a weaker negative predictor of transit use in 2010 and that the presence of young children in participants’ households negatively predicted transit use in 2000 but not in 2010. Chow tests establish that these observed changes represent significant changes in the mode choice relationships in question. The results call for research on similar potential changes in other regions and underscore the importance of family-oriented housing and community features in transit-served areas.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cardenas M. P. The Decline of the Car Enthusiasts: Implications for Undergraduate Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference, University of California, Riverside, ASEE, Washington, D.C., 2013.
2. Traffic Volume Trends. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
3. Millennials & Mobility: Understanding the Millennial Mindset. APTA, Washington, D.C., 2014.
4. Goodwin P., and Van Dender K. ‘Peak Car’—Themes and Issues. Transport Reviews, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2013, pp. 243–254.
5. McDonald N. C. Are Millennials really the “Go-Nowhere” Generation? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 81, No. 2, 2015, pp. 90–103.
6. Kuhnimhof T., Armoogum J., Buehler R., Dargay J., Denstadli J. M., and Yamamoto T. Men Shape a Downward Trend in Car Use among Young Adults—Evidence from Six Industrialized Countries. Transport Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2012, pp. 761–779.
7. Giuliano G., and Dargay J. Car Ownership, Travel and Land Use: A Comparison of the US and Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2006, pp. 106–124.
8. Cao X., and Jordan R. Understanding Transportation Impacts of Transitways: Demographic and Behavioral Differences between Transitway Riders and Other Transit Riders. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2009.
9. Zwerts E., Janssens D., and Wets G. How the Presence of Children Affects Parents’ Travel Behavior. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
10. Dieleman F. M., Dijst M., and Burghouwt G. Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-Level Household Attributes and Residential Context. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 507–527.
11. Scheiner J., and Holz-Rau C. A Comprehensive Study of Life Course, Cohort, and Period Effects on Changes in Travel Mode Use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 47, 2013, pp. 167–181.
12. Lanzendorf M. Key Events and Their Effect on Mobility Biographies: The Case of Childbirth. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2010, pp. 272–292.
13. Turner T., and Niemeier D. Travel to Work and Household Responsibility: New Evidence. Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1997, pp. 397–419.
14. Crane R. Is There a Quiet Revolution in Women’s Travel? Revisiting the Gender Gap in Commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 73, No. 3, 2007, pp. 298–316.
15. McGuckin N., and Murakami E. Examining Trip-Chaining Behavior: Comparison of Travel by Men and Women. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1693, TRB, National Research Council, 1999, pp. 79–85.
16. Franke S. “Eigentlich Ideal, so Ein CashCar!” Ergebnisse Eines Feldversuchs. In Die Mobilitätsmaschine. Versuche Zur Umdeutung Des Autos, Berlin, 2004, pp. 68–80.
17. Paulley N., Balcombe R., Mackett R., Titheridge H., Preston J., Wardman M., Shires J., and White P. The Demand for Public Transport: The Effects of Fares, Quality of Service, Income and Car Ownership. Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2006, pp. 295–306.
18. Cervero R. Paradigm Shift: From Automobility to Accessibility Planning. University of California, Berkeley, 1997.
19. Owen A., and Levinson D. Modeling the Commute Mode Share of Transit Using Continuous Accessibility to Jobs. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 74, 2015, pp. 110–122.
20. Fan Y. The Planners’ War Against Spatial Mismatch: Lessons Learned and Ways Forward. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2012, pp. 153–169.
21. Glaeser E., Kahn M., and Rappaport J. Why Do the Poor Live in Cities? The Role of Public Transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1–24.
22. Shen Q. Job Accessibility as an Indicator of Auto-Oriented Urban Structure: A Comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 115–130.
23. Grengs J. Job Accessibility and the Modal Mismatch in Detroit. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010, pp. 42–54.
24. Fan Y., Guthrie A., and Levinson D. Impact of Light Rail Implementation on Labor Market Accessibility: A Transportation Equity Perspective. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2011.
25. 2030 Park-and-Ride Plan. Metropolitan Council, Saint Paul, Minn., 2010.
26. Gould W. Stata FAQ: Computing the Chow Statistic. StataCorp, College Station, Tex. http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/computing-chow-statistic/index.html.
27. Owen A., Schoner J., and Levinson D. Travel Behavior Over Time: Task 2: Data Collection and Preparation. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2013.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrew Guthrie
Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Humphrey Center, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Yingling Fan
Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Humphrey Center, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Notes

A. Guthrie, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 47

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. How do young people move around in urban spaces?: Exploring trip patte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Gender Responsiveness in Public Transit: Evidence from the 2017 US Nat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Parenthood and cars: A weakening relationship?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Future life course and mobility: A latent class analysis of young adul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Measures of speeding from a GPS-based travel behavior survey
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Factors influencing travel mode choice among families with young child...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub