Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2016

Effect of Silo Storage Time on the Characteristics of Virgin and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures

Abstract

Many hot-mix asphalt plants store material in heated silos before it is ready to be transported to construction sites. The time that material is stored in the silo is not controlled and varies widely, depending on several factors. As the material is exposed to elevated temperatures, short-term aging of the binder may occur. Another important consideration is the interaction between reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and virgin binders, as blending or diffusion could occur between the binders. In this study, a virgin and 25% RAP mixture were sampled at incremental silo storage times up to 10 h. Characterization testing included performance grading, rheological indexes, Glover–Rowe parameter evaluation, rolling thin film oven aging on the binders, complex modulus, a simplified viscoelastic continuum damage model (S-VECD) for fatigue, and thermal stress restrained specimen testing of the mixtures. Simulations that used layered viscoelastic critical distresses pavement analysis to predict fatigue behavior from the S-VECD model were used to show the potential effects of silo storage time on pavement life. Results from all tests indicated that mixtures aged with an increase in silo storage time. RAP materials experienced a greater effect; this effect may be a function of the air void content or indication of blending–diffusion in the silo. Rolling thin film oven aging showed that current laboratory conditioning methods do not necessarily simulate asphalt plant production. Production parameters, such as silo storage time, have a significant impact on mixture performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sabouri M., Bennert T., Daniel J. S., and Kim Y. R. Fatigue and Rutting Evaluation of Laboratory-Produced Asphalt Mixtures Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2506, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 32–44.
2. Daniel J. S., Gibson N., Tarbox S., Copeland A., and Andriescu A. Effect of Long-Term Aging on RAP Mixtures: Laboratory Evaluation of Plant Produced Mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 82, 2013, pp. 327–365.
3. Huang B., Li G., Vukosavljevic D., Shu X., and Egan B. K. Laboratory Investigation of Mixing Hot-Mix Asphalt with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1929, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 37–45.
4. Kriz P., Grant D., Veloza B., Gale M., Blahey A., Brownie J., Shirts R., and Maccarrone S. Blending and Diffusion of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement and Virgin Asphalt Binders. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 83, 2014, pp. 225–270.
5. Zhao S., Huang B., Shu X., and Woods M. E. Quantitative Characterization of Binder Blending: How Much Recycled Binder is Mobilized During Mixing? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2506, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 72–80.
6. Mensching D., Daniel J. S., Bennert T., Mederios M., Elwardany M. Jr., Mogawer W., Hajj E. and Alavi M. Low Temperature Properties of Plant-Produced RAP Mixtures in the Northeast. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 83, 2014, pp. 37–79.
7. Mogawer M., Bennert T., Daniel J. S., Bonaquist R., Austerman A., and Booshehrian A. Performance Characteristics of Plant-Produced High RAP Mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 81, 2012, pp. 403–439.
8. McDaniel R., Shah A., Huber G., and Copeland A. Effects of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Content and Virgin Binder Grade on Properties of Plant Produced Mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 81, 2012, pp. 369–401.
9. Rad F. Y., Sefidmazgi N. R., and Bahia H. Application of Diffusion Mechanism to Study the Degree of Blending Between Fresh and Recycled Asphalt Pavement Binder in Dynamic Shear Rheometer. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2444, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 71–77.
10. Huang S. C., Pauli A., Grimes R. W., and Turner F. Aging Characteristics of RAP Binder Blends—What Types of RAP Binders Are Suitable for Multiple Recycling? Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 83, 2014, pp. 297–343.
11. Howard I. L., Baumgardner G. S., Jordan W. M. III, Menapace A., Mogawer W. S., and Hemsley J. M. Jr. Haul Time Effects on Unmodified, Foamed, and Additive-Modified Binders Used in Hot-Mix Asphalt. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2347, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 88–95.
12. Anderson M., King G., Hanson D., and Blankenship P. Evaluation of the Relationship between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 615–661.
13. Rowe G. M. Prepared Discussion, AAPT paper by M. Anderson, G. King, D. Hanson, and P. Blankenship: Evaluation of the Relationship Between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 649–662.
14. Glover C. J., Davison R. R., Domke C. H., Ruan Y., Juristyarini P., Knorr D. B., and Jung S. H. Development of a New Method for Assessing Asphalt Binder Durability with Field Evaluation. Publication FHWA/TX-05/1872-2. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2005.
15. Rowe G. M., King G., and Anderson M. The Influence of Binder Rheology on the Cracking of Asphalt Mixes on Airport and Highway Projects. ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2014.
16. Christensen D. W., and Anderson D. A. Interpretation of Dynamic Mechanical Test Data for Paving Grade Asphalt Cements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 61, 1992, pp. 67–116.
17. Mogawer W., Bennert T., Austerman A., and Ericson C. Investigating the Aging Mitigation Capabilities of Rejuvenators in High RAP Mixtures Using Black Space Diagrams, Binder Rheology and Mixture Tests. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 84, 2015, pp. 705–738.
18. Underwood B. S., and Kim Y. R. Improved Calculation Method of Damage Parameter in Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 11, 2010, pp. 459–476.
19. Eslaminia M., Thirunavukkarasu S., Guddati M. N., and Kim Y. R. Accelerated Pavement Performance Modeling Using Layered Viscoelastic Analysis. In 7th RILEM International Conference on Cracking in Pavements: Mechanisms, Modeling, Testing, Detection, Prevention and Case Histories (Scarpas A., Kringos N., Al-Qadi I., and Loizos A., eds.), Springer Netherlands, 2012.
20. Park H. J., and Kim Y. R. Investigation into Top-Down Cracking of Asphalt Pavements in North Carolina. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2368, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 45–55.
21. Norouzi A., and Kim Y. R. Mechanistic Evaluation of the Fatigue Cracking in Asphalt Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 16, 2015, pp. 1–17.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher Jacques
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Kingsbury Hall, W183, 33 Academic Way, Durham, NH 03824
Jo Sias Daniel
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Kingsbury Hall, W183, 33 Academic Way, Durham, NH 03824
Thomas Bennert
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation, Rutgers University, 100 Brett Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854
Gerald Reinke
MTE Services Inc., 915 Commercial Court, Onalaska, WI 54650
Amirhossein Norouzi
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695
Christopher Ericson
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation, Rutgers University, 100 Brett Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854
Walaa Mogawer
Highway Sustainability Research Center, University of Massachusetts, 151 Martine Street, Room 131, Fall River, MA 02723
Y. Richard Kim
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695

Notes

J. S. Daniel, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 121

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 26

  1. Case Study on Using Warm Mix Asphalt at Reduced Production Temperature...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Assessment of methods to select optimum doses of rejuvenators for asph...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Significance of the Factors Increasing the Asphalt Pavement Recycl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Linear and nonlinear viscoelastic parameters of asphalt binders modifi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Evaluating the Rutting and Cracking Resistance of Asphalt Mixes Subjec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Impacts of recycled binder availability on volumetric mixture design a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Rheological indexes for asphalt binders considering different aging co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The impact of silo storage on the fatigue and cracking resistance of a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Rheological Indexes for Asphalt Binders Considering Different Aging Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The Correlation between the Number of Asphalt Mixing Plants and the Pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Impact of hot mix asphalt plant silo storage conditions on blending an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Evaluation of cracking susceptibility of Alaskan polymer modified asph...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Blending Between Aged and Virgin Asphalt Binders in Recycled Pavements...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Effect of foaming technique and mixing temperature on the rheological ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Laboratory Evaluation on Performance of Fiber-Modified Asphalt Mixture...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Simulating plant produced material in the laboratory to replicate rheo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Exploring the Possibility of Using Ionic Copolymer Poly (Ethylene-co-M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Evaluating the Performance of the Asphalt Mixes Containing Reclaimed A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Comparing Laboratory Pressure Aging Vessel Conditioning to Field Aging...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. A review of thermal processes in the production and their influences o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Comparing Pressure Aging Vessel Time to Field Aging of Binder as a Fun...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Comparison of asphalt binder and mixture cracking parameters
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Performance evaluation of plant-produced warm mix asphalts containing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Effects of production stages on blending and mechanical properties of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Mechanistic performance evaluation of pavement sections containing RAP...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Applying the Glover-Rowe Parameter to Evaluate Low-Temperature Perform...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub