Evaluating Safety Performance of Climbing Lane Configurations on South Korean Expressways
Abstract
This study evaluated the safety performance of two types of climbing lane configurations—pocket and overtaking—that are implemented on South Korean expressways. For the evaluation, empirical Bayes (EB) and turning point analyses were sequentially applied to compare crash occurrences before and after the configuration change from pocket to overtaking types on 30 climbing lanes. First, the EB analysis with a meta-analysis indicated that the overall safety performance was not significantly degraded after the configuration conversion. However, because some sites were associated with substantial increases in crash occurrences, 11 sites were identified with crashes above the upper bound of a confidence interval estimated from the meta-analysis. A turning point analysis was applied to those sites to validate whether the increase in crash occurrences and the configuration conversions were consistent in the temporal trend. The results show that changes in crash occurrence at three study sites did not coincide with the configuration change, suggesting no evidence for causality. This implies that in a comparative analysis, evaluation of time series of crash occurrences is important, in addition to a comparison of crash frequencies before and after the implementation of roadway facilities. This study suggests that the developed method can be used to evaluate the safety performance of implementing a roadway facility and for selecting sites where the facility degraded the safety performance and required further evaluation by field engineers.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. De Pauw E., Daniels S., Brijs T., Hermans E., and Wets G. An Evaluation of the Traffic Safety Effect of Fixed Speed Cameras. Safety Science, Vol. 62, 2014, pp. 168–174.
2. Shim J., Park S. H., Chung S., and Jang K. Enforcement Avoidance Behavior Near Automated Speed Enforcement Areas in Korean Expressways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 80, 2015, pp. 57–66.
3. Patel R. B., Council F. M., and Griffith M. S. Estimating Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-and-After Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 205–211.
4. Persaud B., Retting R., and Lyon C. Crash Reduction Following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two-Lane Roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, 2004, pp. 1073–1079.
5. Persaud B., Retting R., Garder P., and Lord D. Safety Effect of Roundabout Conversions in the United States: Empirical Bayes Observational Before–After Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1751, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 1–8.
6. Jang K., Chung K., Ragland D. R., and Chan C. Y. Safety Performance of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Facilities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2099, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 132–140.
7. Jang K., Kang S., Seo J., and Chan C. Y. Cross-Section Designs for the Safety Performance of Buffer-Separated High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 3, 2012, pp. 247–254.
8. Gross F., Persaud B., and Lyon C. A Guide to Developing Quality Crash Modification Factors. FHWA-SA-10-032. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
9. Hauer E. On the Estimation of the Expected Number of Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 18, 1986, pp. 1–12.
10. Hauer E. Observational Before–After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
11. Hauer E., Harwood D. W., Council F. M., and Griffith M. S. Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 126–131.
12. Harwood D. W., Bauer K. M., Potts I. B., Torbic D. J., Richard K. R., Kohlman Rabbani E. R., Hauer E., and Elefteriadou L. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes. FHWA-RD-02-089. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
13. Fitzpatrick K., and Park E. S. Safety Effectiveness of HAWK Pedestrian Treatment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 214–223.
14. Persaud B. N. Do Traffic Signals Affect Safety? Some Methodological Issues. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 37–47.
15. Persaud B. N., Hauer E., Retting R., Vallurupalli R., and Mucsi K. Crash Reductions Related to Traffic Signal Removal in Philadelphia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 29, 1997, pp. 803–810.
16. Persaud B., Lan B., Lyon C., and Ghim R. Comparison of Empirical Bayes and Full Bayes Approaches for Before–After Road Safety Evaluations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2009, pp. 38–43.
17. Grillenzoni C. Sequential Smoothing for Turning Point Detection with Application to Financial Decisions. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2014, pp. 132–140.
18. Brüde U., and Elvik R. The Turning Point in the Number of Traffic Fatalities: Two Hypotheses About Changes in Underlying Trends. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 74, 2015, pp. 60–68.
19. Kwon O., Yoon Y., and Jang K. Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Law Banning Handheld Cellphone Use While Driving. Safety Science, Vol. 70, 2014, pp. 50–57.
20. Jang K., Shim J., Chung S., and Park S. H. Effectiveness of Managed Lanes on South Korean Expressways. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
21. Bigham J. M., Rice T. M., Pande S., Lee J., Park S. H., Gutierrez N., and Ragland D. R. Geocoding Police Collision Report Data from California: A Comprehensive Approach. International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 8, No. 72, 2009, DOI:10.1186/1476-072X-8–72.
22. Park S. H., Bigham J. M., Kho S. Y., Kang S., and Kim D. K. Geo-coding Vehicle Collisions on Korean Expressways Based on Postmile Referencing. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1435–1441.
23. Washington S., Shin K., and Van Schalkwyk I. Evaluation of the City of Scottsdale Loop 101 Photo Enforcement Demonstration Program. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, 2008.
24. Lord D., Washington S. P., and Ivan J. N. Poisson, Poisson-gamma and Zero-Inflated Regression Models of Motor Vehicle Crashes: Balancing Statistical Fit and Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35–46.
25. Fleiss J. L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1981.
26. Kwon O., Park M. J., Yeo H., and Chung K. Evaluating the Performance of Network Screening Methods for Detecting High Collision Concentration Locations on Highways, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 51, 2013, pp. 141–149.
27. Kononov J., and Janson B. Diagnostic Methodology for the Detection of Safety Problems at Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 51–56.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 49
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 3
- Heterogeneous traffic flow characteristics on the highway with a climb...
- Evaluation of Section Speed Enforcement System Using Empirical Bayes A...
- An asymmetric cellular automata model for heterogeneous traffic flow o...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
