Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2016

Gender Differences in School and Work Commuting Mode Through the Life Cycle: Exploring Trends in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, 1986 to 2011

Abstract

Reducing auto dependence and increasing the use of active and sustainable modes of transportation for school and work travel are necessary for alleviating traffic congestion issues that are typical in today’s North American cities and regions. While there is a growing interest in increasing the use of active and sustainable modes of travel for commuter trips in transportation planning, less attention has been paid in practice to gender differences in travel demand. This descriptive study explores gender differences in active transportation, public transit, and automobile use through the life cycle to assess temporal changes in gendered transport over the past 25 years in the greater Toronto and Hamilton area, Canada. Findings suggest that female children and youths are driven to school more frequently than males; however, males drive more than females during the years of labor force participation. Differences between female and male automobile use increase with age, but the gender gap has declined since the mid-1980s. Factors such as having one vehicle per household, more than six household members, and living and working in the city of Toronto are shown to associate with the largest differences in driving between full-time employed women and men. Distances between home and work have increased, particularly for women, and the percentage of women with a driver’s license has increased. Although driving remains higher for men than women during the part of the life course that includes labor force participation, the gender gap in active transportation, public transit, and automobile use appears to be lower today than in the mid-1980s.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. The Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Greater Toronto Transportation Authority, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
2. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Control and Prevention and Health Promotion, President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, Atlanta, Georgia, 1996.
3. Faulkner G., Buliung R., Flora P., and Fusco C. Active School Transport, Physical Activity Levels and Body Weight of Children and Youth: A Systematic Review. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 48, 2009, pp. 3–8.
4. Saris W. H. M., Blair S. N., van Baak M. A., Eaton S. B., Davies P. S. W., Di Pietro L., Fogelholm L., Rissanen A., Schoeller D., Swinburn B., Tremblay A., Westerterp K. R., and Wyatt H. How Much Physical Activity Is Enough to Prevent Unhealthy Weight Gain? Outcome of the IASO First Stock Conference and Consensus Statement. In Obesity Reviews, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2003, pp. 101–114.
5. Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence, TRB Special Report 282. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
6. Mammen G., Faulkner G., Buliung R., and Lay J. Understanding the Drive to Escort: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Examining Parental Attitudes towards Children’s School Travel and Independent Mobility. BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, 2012, pp. 862–874.
7. Mitra R., Buliung R. N., and Faulkner G. Spatial Clustering and Temporal Mobility of Walking School Trips in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada. Health and Place, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2010, pp. 646–655.
8. Murray L. Making the Journey to School: The Gendered and Generational Aspects of Risk in Constructing Everyday Mobility. Health, Risk and Society, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2009, pp. 471–486.
9. Leslie E., Kremer P., Toumbourou J. W., and Williams J. W. Gender Differences in Personal, Social and Environmental Influences on Active Travel to and from School for Australian Adolescents. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2010, pp. 597–601.
10. McDonald N. C. Is There A Gender Gap in School Travel? An Examination of U.S. Children and Adolescents. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 20, 2010, pp. 80–86.
11. Ham S. A., Martin S., and Kohl H. W. Changes in The Percentage of Students Who Walk or Bike to School—United States, 1969 and 2001. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 5, 2008, pp. 205–215.
12. Buliung R. N., Mitra R., and Faulkner G. Active School Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: An Exploration of Trends in Space and Time (1986–2006). Preventive Medicine, Vol. 48, 2009, pp. 507–512.
13. Faulkner G., Richichi V., Buliung R., Fusco C., and Moola F. What’s “Quickest and Easiest?” Parental Decision Making About School Trip Mode. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 7, No. 62, 2010, pp. 1–11.
14. Hsu H., and Saphores J. Impacts of Parental Gender and Attitudes on Children’s School Travel Mode and Parental Chauffeuring Behavior: Results for California Based on the 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 543–565.
15. Hanson S. Gender and Mobility: New Approaches for Informing Sustainability. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5–23.
16. Polk M. The Influence of Gender on Daily Car Use and on Willingness to Reduce Car Use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 12, 2004, pp. 185–195.
17. Lang J. Women and Transport. Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 10, 1992, pp. 14–24.
18. Madden J. Why Women Work Closer to Home. Urban Studies, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 181–94.
19. Hanson S., and Johnston I. Gender Differences in Work-Trip Length: Explanations and Implications. Urban Geography, Vol. 6, 1985, pp. 193–219.
20. Singell L., and Lillydahl J. An Empirical Analysis of the Commute to Work Patterns of Males and Females in Two-Earner Households. Urban Studies, Vol. 2, 1986, pp. 119–29.
21. Johnston-Anumonwo I. The Influence of Household Type on Gender Differences in Worktrip Distance. Professional Geographer, Vol. 44, 1992, pp. 161–69.
22. Rosenbloom S. Understanding Women’s and Men’s Travel Patterns: The Research Challenge. In Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Volume 1 Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, Conference Proceedings 35, Washington, D.C., National Research Council, 2006, pp. 7–28.
23. Law R. Beyond ‘Women and Transport’: Towards New Geographies of Gender and Daily Mobility. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1999, pp. 567–688.
24. de Madariaga I. From Women and Transport to Gender in Transport: Challenging Conceptual Frameworks for Improved Policymaking. In Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2013, pp. 43–66.
25. Trends in Higher Education: Volume 1-Enrolment. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, 2011.
26. Buliung R., Larsen K., Hess P., Faulkner G., Fusco C., and Rothman L. Driven to School: Social Fears and Traffic Environments. In Walks A. (Ed.) Driving Cities, Driving Inequality, Driving Politics: The Urban Political Economy and Ecology of Automobility. Routledge, New York, 2015, pp. 81–100.
27. Child and Youth Injury in Review, 2009 Edition. Public Health Agency of Canada, 2009.
28. Pickup L. Women’s Gender-Role and its Influence on Travel Behaviour. Built Environment, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1984, pp. 61–68.
29. Vance C., and Iovanna R. Gender and the Automobile: Analysis of Nonwork Service Trips. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2013, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 54–61.
30. Habib K. N. Household-Level Commuting Mode Choices, Car Allocation and Car Ownership Level Choices of Two-Worker Households: The Case of the City of Toronto. Transportation, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 651–672.
31. Statistics Canada. Time Spent on Various Activities by Sex. General Social Survey, 2005, Catalogue No. 12F0080XWE.
32. Sivak M. Female Drivers in the United States, 1963–2010: From a Minority to a Majority? Injury Prevention, Vol. 14, 2013, pp. 259–260.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2016
Issue published: January 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michele Colley
Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6 Canada
Ron N. Buliung
Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6 Canada

Notes

M. Colley, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 167

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 12

  1. Factors Affecting Active Commuting to School in Sprawled Cities: The C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Ethnoracial disparities in commute duration and mode among Canadian-bo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Do Citizens Understand the Benefits of Transit-Oriented Development? E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Prevalence and Correlates of Active Transportation to School Among Col...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The fast and the female: Gender differences in wellbeing and wage cons...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Active commuting to school among 36,781 Spanish children and adolescen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Women's Travel Patterns, Attitudes, and Constraints Around the World
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: Students’ ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Interventions Aiming to Promote Active Commuting in Children and Adole...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. I’ll have to drive there: How daily time constraints impact women’s ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Active transport to and from school
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A comparison of car driving, public transport and cycling experiences ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub