Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Optimizing Traffic Flow Efficiency by Controlling Lane Changes: Collective, Group, and User Optima

Abstract

Lane changes can lead to disturbances in traffic flow, and the uneven distribution of traffic over different lanes as a result of lane changes can also lead to instability and congestion in one specific lane. Advice on lane changing can therefore be beneficial to both individual drivers and traffic in the network. The many variations in the content and objectives of advice, however, may affect the effectiveness of the advice. This paper focuses on the optimization of traffic flow through the performance of specific lane changes. Traffic flow is modeled on a two-lane stretch, and lane change time instants of a subset of vehicles are considered as decision variables. Optimizations with three objectives are constructed: a collective optimum, a group optimum, and a user optimum. These optima are found through the minimization of the total travel delay of different vehicle groups. To solve the problems, a genetic algorithm is implemented as a heuristic method. Each optimum leads to different lane changes. Specifically, through the proposed algorithm, vehicles receive suggestions to change lanes in bigger gaps to improve collective or group efficiency and are supposed to overtake as many vehicles as they can by changing lanes for their own benefit. The algorithm can be further extended to a more effective in-car advice system, which can improve traffic efficiency through communication with partly automated vehicles.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jin W.-L. Macroscopic Characteristics of Lane-Changing Traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2188, 2010, pp. 55–63. https://doi.org/10.3141/2188-07.
2. Gazis D. C., Herman R., and Weiss G. H. Density Oscillations Between Lanes of Multilane Highway. Operations Research, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1962, pp. 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.10.5.658.
3. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., and Laval J. Freeway Traffic Oscillations: Microscopic Analysis of Formations and Propagations Using Wavelet Transform. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 45, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1378–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.012.
4. Pande A., and Abdel-Aty M. Assessment of Freeway Traffic Parameters Leading to Lane-Change Related Collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2006, pp. 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.004.
5. Roncoli C., Papageorgiou M., and Papamichail I. Traffic Flow Optimisation in Presence of Vehicle Automation and Communication Systems—Part II: Optimal Control for Multi-Lane Motorways. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 57, 2015, pp. 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.011.
6. Schakel W. J., and van Arem B. Improving Traffic Flow Efficiency by In-Car Advice on Lane, Speed, and Headway. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2014, pp. 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2303577.
7. Knoop L. V., de Bakker F. P., Tiberius C. C. J. M., and van Arem B. Single Frequency Precise Point Positioning: Obtaining a Map Accurate to Lane-Level. In Proceedings of 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, New York, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728563.
8. Schakel W. J., and van Arem B. Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow Stability. In Proceedings of 13th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2010, pp. 759–764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625133.
9. Cassidy M. J., Daganzo C. F., Jang K., and Chung K. Spatiotemporal Effects of Segregating Different Vehicle Classes on Separate Lanes. In Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee, Springer, Berlin, 2009, pp. 57–74.
10. Daganzo C. F. A Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow—Part I: Long Homogeneous Freeway Sections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00042-4.
11. Roncoli C., Papageorgiou M., and Papamichail I. Traffic Flow Optimisation in Presence of Vehicle Automation and Communication Systems—Part I: A First-Order Multi-Lane Model for Motorway Traffic. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 57, 2015, pp. 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.014.
12. Knoop V. L., Aurelien D., Christien B., and Bart A. Lane Distribution of Traffic Near Merging Zones Influence of Variable Speed Limits. In Proceedings of 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, New York, 2010.
13. Randolph H. W., and Caliskan C. Design and Evaluation of an Automated Highway System with Optimized Lane Assignment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 7, 1999, pp. 1–15.
14. Wang M., Serge H. P., Daamen W., van Arem B., and Happee R. Game Theoretic Approach for Predictive Lane-Changing and Car-Following Control. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 58, 2015, pp. 73–92.
15. Kita H. A Merging–Giveway Interaction Model of Cars in a Merging Section: A Game Theoretic Analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3–4, 1999, pp. 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00039-1.
16. Liu H.X. A Game Theoretical Approach for Modelling Merging and Yielding Behaviour at Freeway On-Ramp Section. In Proceedings of 17th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2007, pp. 197–211.
17. Talebpour A., Mahmassani H. S., and Hamdar S. H. Modeling Lane-Changing Behavior in a Connected Environment: A Game Theory Approach. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 7, 2015, pp. 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.06.022.
18. Xu G., Liu L., Ou Y., and Song Z. Dynamic Modelling of Driver Control Strategy of Lane-Change Behavior and Trajectory Planning for Collision Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1138–1155. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2012.2187447.
19. Hatipoglu C., Ozguner U., and Redmill K. A. Automated Lane Change Controller Design. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2003, pp. 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2003.811644.
20. Fudenberg D., and Tirole J. Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1991.
21. Whitley D. A Genetic Algorithm Tutorial. Statistics and Computing, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1994, pp. 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175354.
22. Newell F. G. A Simplified Car-Following Theory: A Lower Order Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2002, pp. 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00044-8.
23. Papageorgiou M., Diakaki C., Dinopoulou V., Kotsialos A., and Yibing W. Review of Road Traffic Control Strategies. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 91, No. 12, 2003, pp. 2043–2067.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shengyue Yao
Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, Netherlands
Victor L. Knoop
Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, Netherlands
Bart van Arem
Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, Netherlands

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 76

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 15

  1. A digital decision approach for indirect-reciprocity based cooperative...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Research on Cooperative Control for On-Ramp Merging with Multiple Lane...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Proactive longitudinal control to preclude disruptive lane changes of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Differences in Optimised Trajectories Under Selfish and collaborative ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A stochastic microscopic based freeway traffic state and spatial-tempo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Evaluation of Automatic Lane-Change Model Based on Vehicle Cluster Gen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The Study of Connected System Specification for Traffic Flow Control w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Modeling decentralized mandatory lane change for connected and autonom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Investigation of lane-changing decision-making models for autonomous v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Lane-Change Gaming Decision Control Based on Multiple Targets Evaluati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Three-Player Cooperative Game With Side-Payments for Discretionary Lan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A novel evaluation method for vehicle and traffic performance of diffe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The Persuasive Automobile: Design and Evaluation of a Persuasive Lane-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Pay to change lanes: A cooperative lane-changing strategy for connecte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A cellular automata traffic flow model combined with a BP neural netwo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub