Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Modeling Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve Design on Injury Severity of Single-Motorcycle Crashes with Mixed-Effects Logistic Model

Abstract

Horizontal curves have been of great interest to transportation researchers because of expected safety hazards for motorcyclists. The impacts of horizontal curve design on motorcycle crash injuries are not well documented in previous studies. The current study aimed to investigate and to quantify the effects of horizontal curve design and associated factors on the injury severity of single-motorcycle crashes with consideration of the issue of unobserved heterogeneity. A mixed-effects logistic model was developed on the basis of 2,168 single-motorcycle crashes, which were collected on 8,597 horizontal curves in Florida for a period of 11 years (2005 to 2015). Four normally distributed random parameters (moderate curves, reverse curves, older riders, and male riders) were identified. The modeling results showed that sharp curves (radius <1,500 ft) compared with flat curves (radius ≥4,000 ft) tended to increase significantly the probability of severe injury (fatal or incapacitating injury) by 7.7%. In total, 63.8% of single-motorcycle crashes occurring on reverse curves are more likely to result in severe injury, and the remaining 26.2% are less likely to result in severe injury. Motorcyclist safety compensation behaviors (psychologically feeling safe, and then riding aggressively, or vice versa) may result in counterintuitive effects (e.g., vegetation and paved medians, full-access-controlled roads, and pavement conditions) or random parameters (e.g., moderate curve and reverse curve). Other significant factors include lighting conditions (darkness and darkness with lights), weekends, speed or speeding, collision type, alcohol or drug impairment, rider age, and helmet use.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lee C. Motorcycle Crash Facts in Florida. http://ridesmartflorida.com/index.php/crash-facts. Accessed June 1, 2016.
2. Wang Z., Lee C., and Lin P.-S. Modeling Injury Severity of Single-Motorcycle Crashes on Curved Roadway Segments. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
3. Schneider W. IV, Zimmerman K., Van Boxel D., and Vavilikolanu S. Bayesian Analysis of the Effect of Horizontal Curvature on Truck Crashes Using Training and Validation Data Sets. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2096, 2009, pp. 41–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2096-06.
4. Shankar V., and Mannering F. An Exploratory Multinomial Logit Analysis of Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Accident Severity. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1996, pp. 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(96)00010-2.
5. Mannering F. L., Shankar V., and Bhat C. R. Unobserved Heterogeneity and the Statistical Analysis of Highway Accident Data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001.
6. Lord D., and Mannering F. The Statistical Analysis of Crash-Frequency Data: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2010, pp. 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.001.
7. Savolainen P., and Mannering F. Probabilistic Models of Motorcyclists’ Injury Severities in Single- and Multi-Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2007, pp. 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.016.
8. Geedipally S. R., Turner P. A., and Patil S. Analysis of Motorcycle Crashes in Texas with Multinomial Logit Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2265, 2012, pp. 62–69. https://doi.org/10.3141/2265-07.
9. Eustace D., and Indupuru V. K. A Simplified Method for Analyzing Factors Contributing to Motorcyclists’ Fatal Injuries in Ohio. Advances in Transportation Studies, Section B 24, 2011, pp. 85–96.
10. Shaheed M. S., and Gkritza K. A Latent Class Analysis of Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Crash Severity Outcomes. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 2, 2014, pp. 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2014.03.002.
11. Schneider W. H., and Savolainen P. T. Comparison of Severity of Motorcyclist Injury by Crash Types. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2265, 2012, pp. 70–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/2265-08.
12. Rifaat S. M., Tay R., and De Barros A. Severity of Motorcycle Crashes in Calgary. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 49, 2012, pp. 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.025.
13. Jung S., Xiao Q., and Yoon Y. Evaluation of Motorcycle Safety Strategies Using the Severity of Injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.030.
14. Quddus M., Noland R. B., and Chin H. C. An Analysis of Motorcycle Injury and Vehicle Damage Severity Using Ordered Probit Models. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2002, pp. 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00051-8.
15. Chang H.-L., and Yeh T.-H. Risk Factors to Driver Fatalities in Single-Vehicle Crashes: Comparisons Between Non-Motorcycle Drivers and Motorcyclists. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 3, 2006, pp. 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:3(227).
16. Savolainen P. T., Mannering F. L., Lord D., and Quddus M. A. The Statistical Analysis of Highway Crash-Injury Severities: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.025.
17. Mannering F. L., and Bhat C. R. Analytic Methods in Accident Research: Methodological Frontier and Future Directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 1, 2014, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2013.09.001.
18. Long J. S., and Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Stata Press, College Station, Tex., 2006.
19. Train K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271.
20. Williams R. Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects. Stata Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2012, p. 308.
21. Greene W. NLOGIT 5.0. Econometric Software, Inc., Plainview, New York, 2012.
22. Washington S. P., Karlaftis M. G., and Mannering F. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2010.
23. AASHTO. Highway Safety Manual. Washington, D.C., 2010.
24. Evans J. D. Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks Cole, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1996.
25. Peltzman S. The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, No. 4, 1975, pp. 677–725. https://doi.org/10.1086/260352.
26. Adams J. G. U. Public Safety Legislation and the Risk Compensation Hypothesis: The Example of Motorcycle Helmet Legislation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1983, pp. 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1068/c010193.
27. Lin M.-R., Chang S.-H., Pai L., and Keyl P. M. A Longitudinal Study of Risk Factors for Motorcycle Crashes Among Junior College Students in Taiwan. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2003, pp. 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00002-7.
28. Keng S. H. Helmet Use and Motorcycle Fatalities in Taiwan. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2005, pp. 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.006.
29. Ulfarsson G. F., and Mannering F. L. Differences in Male and Female Injury Severities in Sport-Utility Vehicle, Minivan, Pickup and Passenger Car Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2004, pp. 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00135-5.
30. Xin C., Wang Z., Lin P.-S., Lee C., and Guo R. Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve Design on Motorcycle Crash Frequency on Rural, Two-Lane, Undivided Highways in Florida. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2637, 2017, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2637-01.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chunfu Xin
Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, College of Engineering, ENC2006, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620
Zhenyu Wang
CUT100, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620
Chanyoung Lee
CUT100, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620
Pei-Sung Lin
CUT100, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 166

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 30

  1. Modeling of single-vehicle and multi-vehicle truck-involved crashes in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Temporal instability and differences in injury severity between restra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. An empirical analysis on the effects of alcohol-impairment in injury s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Identifying the heterogeneous effects of road characteristics on Motor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Investigating two-wheelers risk factors for severe crashes using an in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Comparison of injury severity between E-bikes-related and other two-wh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Differences in single-vehicle motorcycle crashes caused by distraction...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. How do road infrastructure investments affect Powered Two-Wheelers cra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Modeling the Motorcycle Crash Severity on Nonintersection Urban Roadwa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Temporal instability assessment of motorcyclist-injury severities usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Temporal Instability and Transferability Analysis of Daytime and Night...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Analyzing the impact of curve and slope on multi-vehicle truck crash s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The impact of weekday, weekend, and holiday crashes on motorcyclist in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Evaluating gender differences in injury severities of non-helmet weari...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Motorcyclist injury severity analysis: a comparison of Artificial Neur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Multilevel Mixed-Effects Models to Identify Contributing Factors on Fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. An analysis of motorcyclists' injury severities in work-zone crashes w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. What Factors Would Make Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Crashes Fatal? Empir...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Empirical comparison of the effects of urban and rural crashes on moto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Investigation of speed and trajectory of motorcycle riders at curved r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The effect of motorcyclists’ age on injury severities in single-motorc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Non-Stationary Modeling of Microlevel Road-Curve Crash Frequency with ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve Design and Lane and Shoulder Width ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. A spatiotemporal analysis of motorcyclist injury severity: Findings fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Safety of motorised two wheelers in mixed traffic conditions: Literatu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. A data mining approach to investigate patterns of powered two-wheeler ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. A statistical assessment of temporal instability in the factors determ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Development of crash modification factors of horizontal curve design f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. The effects of neighborhood characteristics and the built environment ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub