Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Diesel Multiple Units in 21st Century North America: Comparative Survey and Evaluation of Services, Demand, and Cost

Abstract

U.S. officials working with finite resources to build and operate new fixed-guideway transit services grow more creative every year, finding ways to offer new and expanded services with fixed or declining resources. One creative approach to the development of new urban passenger rail services has been to operate on tracks shared with light-density freight services. Most services have used conventional commuter rail passenger rolling stock for these services, but, in some circumstances, this relatively heavy equipment has been inappropriate, and officials have been forced to consider sharing freight tracks with lighter, shorter trains. Some of these trains have been conventional electric light rail cars, but since the turn of the 21st century, five new U.S. services using self-powered diesel rail cars (historically called diesel multiple units, or DMUs) have opened to offer new travel options in Texas, California, New Jersey, and Oregon. FTA has termed these new shared-track DMU services “hybrid rail.” This paper reviews the circumstances and conditions that gave rise to the development of these hybrid DMU systems. The paper then reports the results of a study that used federally reported data to conduct a survey and evaluation of these services as compared with electric light rail and conventional commuter rail services. The analysis found that the new DMU systems tended to function in a new service stratum between commuter and light rail that served the needs of markets that neither of those traditional modes was well suited to address.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Carolan M., Jacobsen K., Llana P., Severson K., Perlman B., and Tyrell D. Technical Criteria and Procedures for Evaluating the Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection Performance of Alternatively Designed Passenger Rail Equipment for Use in Tier I Service. DOT/FRA/ORD-11/22. Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
2. Phraner S. D., Roberts R. T., Stangas P. K., Korach K. A., Shortreed J. H., and Thompson G. J. TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit or Diesel Multiple Unit Vehicles with Railroads. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_52-a.pdf.
3. Bing A. J., Tsai T., Nelson D. O., and Mayville R. A. Safety of Noncompliant Passenger Rail Equipment. In Transportation Research Circular E-C112: Joint International Light Rail Conference: A World of Applications and Opportunities, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 635–649. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec112.pdf.
4. Lu A., and Nelson D. O. Business Case for Shared-Track Operations. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
5. Lu A., and Nelson D. O. Shared Track in North America. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
6. Booz Allen Hamilton, Jacobs Edwards & Kelcey, ICF Consulting, and New Jersey Institute of Technology. TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner’s Guide. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. https://doi.org/10.17226/14220.
7. Bing A., Beshers E. W., Chavez M., Simpson D. P., Horowitz E. S., and Zullig W. E. NCHRP Report 657: Guidebook for Implementing Passenger Rail Service on Shared Passenger and Freight Corridors. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. https://doi.org/10.17226/14376.
8. FRA Issues Alternative-Design Vehicle Waiver to Denton County Transportation Authority. Progressive Railroading, June 2012. http://www.progressiverailroading.com/passenger_rail/article/FRA-issues-alternative-design-vehicle-waiver-to-Denton-County-Transportation-Authority--31230. Accessed July 28, 2016.
9. ENSCO, Inc., ICF Consulting, Edwards & Kelcey, Inc., Booz Allen and Hamilton and New Jersey Institute of Technology. ITS Technologies for Integrated Rail Corridors Volumes 1, 2 and 3. Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David O. Nelson
Jacobs Engineering Group, 343 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210
Tara N. Blakey
Jacobs Engineering Group, 3750 Northwest 87th Avenue, Miami, FL 33178
Katherine K. O’Neil
Keolis Commuter Service, 470 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02210

Notes

D. O. Nelson, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 31

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub