Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Qualitative Analysis of Ride-Hailing Regulations in Major American Cities

Rachel Beer, Candace Brakewood [email protected], Subrina Rahman, and Jennifer ViscardiView all authors and affiliations
Volume 2650, Issue 1
https://doi.org/10.3141/2650-10

Abstract

Ride-hailing services, which are provided by companies such as Uber and Lyft, are increasingly common in many American cities. Several cities are now regulating or considering regulation of these services. However, regulation has not been well documented across jurisdictions, and city planners and policy makers often want to understand what regulations are being put in place in comparable metropolitan areas. Therefore, the objective of this research was to provide a qualitative comparison of the regulations of ride-hailing companies between major American cities. This goal was accomplished through the evaluation of five driver-related and three company-related types of ride-hailing regulations in 15 major American cities. The driver-related regulations included requirements for background checks, driver’s licenses, vehicle registrations, special licenses such as business licenses, and external vehicle displays. The company-related regulations included requirements for the number of ride-hailing vehicles operating in a metropolitan area, providing a list of drivers to the city, and sharing trip data with the city. The results of this qualitative analysis reveal significant variation in the number of driver-related regulations imposed in the cities that were evaluated. Another key finding is that ride-hailing companies may be less likely to operate in cities where fingerprint-based background checks are mandatory. As ride-hailing regulations continue to evolve, this research can help planners and policy makers better understand the current state of local regulations by providing a systematic comparison across major metropolitan areas in the United States.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Special Report 319: Between Public and Private Mobility: Examining the Rise of Technology-Enabled Transportation Services, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
Google Scholar
2. Amey A., Attanucci J., and Mishalani R. Real-Time Ridesharing: Opportunities and Challenges of Using Mobile Phone Technology to Improve Rideshare Services. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2217, 2011, pp. 103–110. https://doi.org/10.3141/2217-13.
Google Scholar
3. Sun C., and Edara P. Is Getting an Uber-Lyft from a Sidecar Different from Hailing a Taxi? Current Dynamic Ridesharing Controversy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2536, 2015, pp. 60–62. https://doi.org/10.3141/2536-08.
Google Scholar
4. Schaller B. Entry Controls in Taxi Regulation: Implications of US and Canadian Experience for Taxi Regulation and Deregulation. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2007, pp. 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.010.
Google Scholar
5. Cohen M., and Sundararajan A. Self-Regulation and Innovation in the Peer-to-Peer Sharing Economy. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2015, pp. 116–133.
Google Scholar
6. Davidson N., and Infranca J. The Sharing Economy as an Urban Phenomenon. Yale Law and Policy Review, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2016, pp. 214–279.
Google Scholar
7. Rauch D., and Schleicher D. Like Uber, but for Local Government Law: The Future of Local Regulation of the Sharing Economy. Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 76, 2015, pp. 901–963.
Google Scholar
8. Posen H. A. Ridehailing in the Sharing Economy: Should Regulators Impose Uber Regulations on Uber? Iowa Law Review, Vol. 101, No. 1, 2013, pp. 420–430.
Google Scholar
9. International Transport Forum. App-Based Ride and Taxi Services. Principles for Regulation. Corporate Partnership Board Report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2016.
Google Scholar
10. United States Census Bureau. American FactFinder. Results of 2015 Estimate. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml.
Google Scholar
11. New York, New York. Municipal Code. For-Hire Service, 2016, Chapter 59. http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/downloads/pdf/rule_book_current_chapter_59.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
12. Department of Motor Vehicles. New York State Driver License Classes. https://dmv.ny.gov/driver-license/nys-driver-license-classes. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
13. Seattle, Washington. Municipal Code. Taxicabs and For-Hire Vehicles, 2014, Chapter 6.310. https://www.municode.com/library/wa/seattle/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=TIT6BURE_SUBTITLE_IVNELICO_CH6.310TAFREVE. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
14. Seattle, Washington. Rules for Transportation Network Companies/TNC Drivers. https://www.seattle.gov/business-regulations/taxis-for-hires-and-tncs/transportation-network-companies/tnc-drivers. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
15. Nashville, Tennessee. Municipal Code. Other Passenger Vehicles for Hire, Chapter 6.74. 2014. https://www.municode.com/library/tn/metro_government_of_nashville_and_davidson_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_TIT6BULIRE_DIVIGERE_CH6.74OTPAVEHI. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
16. New Orleans, Louisiana. Municipal Code. Chapter 162, Article XV: Transportation Network Companies. 2015. https://www.municode.com/library/la/new_orleans/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICO_CH162VEHI_ARTXVTRNECO. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
17. New Orleans, Louisiana. Department of Safety and Permits, Taxicab and For-Hire Vehicle Bureau. Guide for Permitted Activities: Taxicabs, TNCs, and Limousines. http://www.nola.gov/getattachment/Taxi/Transportation-Network-Companies/Guide-for-Permitted-Activities.pdf/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
18. Atlanta, Georgia. Municipal Code. Chapter 22, Article III, Division 7: Ground Transportation Services. 2016. http://atlantacityga.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?ID=8936. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
19. Yamanouchi K. Uber X, Lyft Set for Legal Pickups at Atlanta Airport. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. http://www.myajc.com/business/uber-lyft-set-for-legal-pickups-atlanta-airport/XRVgS1swlof0a1FVQ0bPOO/. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
20. Chicago, Illinois. Municipal Code. Chapter 2-25: Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, Chapter 9-115: Transportation Network Providers. 2017. https://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/dol/rulesandregs/TNPRulesAmendedeffJan12017.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
21. Dallas, Texas. Municipal Code. Chapter 47A: Transportation for Hire. 2016. http://dallascityhall.com/departments/codecompliance/DCH%20documents/CHAPTER%2047A%20TRANSPORTATION%20FOR%20HIRE.html. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
22. Minneapolis, Minnesota. Municipal Code. Transportation Network Companies, chapter 343. 2014. http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/www/groups/public/@regservices/documents/webcontent/wcms1p-129014.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
23. Portland, Oregon. Municipal Code. Private For-Hire Transportation Regulations, chapter 16.40. 2016. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/citycode/index.cfm?cce_28593_print=1&c=28593. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
24. San Antonio, Texas. Municipal Code. Chapter 33, Article IX: Transportation Network Companies. 2015. https://www.municode.com/library/tx/san_antonio/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICO_CH33VEHI_ARTIXTRNECO&showChanges=true. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
25. Martinez M. A. San Antonio Pushing to Make Ridesharing Safer. KENS5 Eyewitness News, San Antonio, March 7, 2017. http://www.kens5.com/money/consumer/san-antonio-pushing-to-make-ridesharing-safer/420692530. Accessed March 13, 2017.
Google Scholar
26. Washington D.C. Municipal Code. Act 20-489: Vehicle-for-Hire Innovation Amendment Act of 2014. 2014. http://www.naic.org/documents/committees_c_sharing_econ_wg_dc_act_20_489.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
27. Miami, Florida. Municipal Code. Chapter 31, Article VII: Regulation of Transportation Network Entities, Drivers and Vehicles. 2016. https://www.municode.com/library/fl/miami_-_dade_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIIICOOR_CH31VEHI_ARTVIIRETRNEENDRVE_S31-703TRNEENDR&showChanges=true. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
28. Columbus, Ohio. Municipal Code. Transportation Network Company License, Chapter 588. 2016. https://www.municode.com/library/oh/columbus/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT5BURELICO_CH588TRNECOLI. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
29. Columbus, Ohio. Transportation Network Driver Requirements, Chapter 590. 2016. https://www.municode.com/library/oh/columbus/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT5BURELICO_CH590TRNEDRRE. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
30. Houston, Texas. Municipal Code. Vehicles for Hire, Chapter 46. 2016. https://www.municode.com/library/tx/houston/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH46VEHI_ARTIXTRNECO&showChanges=true. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
31. McPhate M. Uber and Lyft End Rides in Austin to Protest Fingerprint Background Checks. New York Times, May 9, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/technology/uber-and-lyft-stop-rides-in-austin-to-protest-fingerprint-background-checks.html. Accessed March 11, 2017.
Google Scholar
32. Austin, Texas. Municipal Code. Chapter 13-2: Ground Transportation Services. 2015. https://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm%3Fid=245769. Accessed March 7, 2017.
Google Scholar
33. Ohio. House Bill 237. Regulates Transportation Network Companies and Services. 2016. https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/legislation-documents?id=GA131-HB-237. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
34. Georgia. House Bill 225. Local Government. All For-Hire Drivers Obtain a For-Hire License Endorsement Before Driving for Hire. 2015. http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/en-US/display/20152016/HB/225. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
35. Texas. House Bill 1733. An Act Relating to Automobile Liability Insurance for Transportation Network Company Drivers. 2016. http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=84R&Bill=HB1733#. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
36. Minnesota. Senate File 1679. Transportation Network Companies Financial Responsibility. 2015. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/pages/doctypes/bills/bill.php?b=Senate&f=SF1679&ssn=0&y=2015. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
37. Tennessee. House Bill 907. Transportation Network Company Services Act. 2015. http://share.tn.gov/sos/acts/109/pub/pc0520.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
38. Louisiana. Senate Bill 172. Liability Insurance: Provide with Respect to the Transportation Network Company Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law. 2016. https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=960322. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
39. Washington. Senate Bill 5550. Regulating Providers of Commercial Transportation Services. 2015. http://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5550&Year=2015#documentSection. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
40. Illinois. Senate Bill 2774. Transportation Network Providers Act. 2015. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?Name=098-1173. Accessed March 14, 2017.
Google Scholar
41. Graves Z., and Moylan A. Ridescore 2015: Hired Driver Rules in U.S. Cities. R Street Policy Study No. 48, December 2015. http://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/RSTREET48.pdf. Accessed Oct. 30, 2016.
Google Scholar

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 2650, Issue 1
Pages: 84 - 91
Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rachel Beer
City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031
View all articles by this author
Candace Brakewood
City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tickle College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 851 Neyland Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996-2313
[email protected]
View all articles by this author
Subrina Rahman
City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031
View all articles by this author
Jennifer Viscardi
City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031
View all articles by this author

Notes

C. Brakewood, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 384

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 30

  1. The trend of the structural change of the city taxi market in China: a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The impact of regulatory policy on the growth of ride-hailing platform...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Understanding market competition between transportation network compan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Small and medium-sized taxi firm operators' stated choices of future b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. An exploratory analysis of alternative travel behaviors of ride-hailin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Impacts of congestion pricing on ride-hailing ridership: Evidence from...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Shifting Mobility Behaviors in Unprecedented Times: A Multigroup MIMIC...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Smart Transportation Behavior through the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Ride-Ha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The impact of ridesourcing on equity and sustainability in North Ameri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Improvement of an online ride-hailing system based on empirical GPS da...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A stochastic generalized Nash equilibrium model for platforms competit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Contested mobility interactions: Characterizing the influence of ride-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Governance matters: Regulating ride hailing platforms in Canada's larg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Does travel closer to TOD have lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from ride...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Exploring impacts of COVID-19 on city-wide taxi and ride-sourcing mark...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Contested Mobility Interactions: Characterizing the Influence of Ride-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Travellers’ perceptions about ride-hailing services in Lahore: An exte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. The sharing economy and the job market: the case of ride-hailing drive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The Social, Economic, and Environmental Impacts of Ridesourcing Servic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Regulating mobility-on-demand services: Tri-level model and Bayesian o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. On the Pricing Decision of Monopoly Online Car-Hailing Platform Consid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Research on the App-Based Ride-Hailing Reasonability of Driver and Veh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Regulation strategies of ride-hailing market in China: an evolutionary...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an internatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The sustainability of shared mobility: Can a platform for shared rides...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VK...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Active Supervision Strategies of Online Ride-Hailing Based on the Trip...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users’ characterisation and effects...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Trends in Taxi Use and the Advent of Ridehailing, 1995–2017: Evidence ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub
Download PDF

Also from Sage