Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

UberHOP in Seattle: Who, Why, and How?

Elyse O’C. Lewis [email protected] and Don MacKenzieView all authors and affiliations
Volume 2650, Issue 1
https://doi.org/10.3141/2650-12

Abstract

UberHOP is a commute-focused interpretation of the Uber suite of transportation services, with the goal of reducing personal vehicle commute trips. The service first launched in Seattle, Washington, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in December 2015 and expanded to Manila, Philippines, in early 2016. UberHOP is similar to vanpooling with fixed pickup and drop-off locations in the primary commute direction during peak hours, but it leverages Uber’s ridesourcing platform to replace fixed departure schedules with riders matched in real time. This paper reports on an intercept survey (83% response rate) to understand who rode, how they traveled to the pickup location, why they rode, and what modes UberHOP was replacing for all 11 UberHOP routes in Seattle during the morning and evening commute periods. In addition, detailed trip and total rider count data were collected during the survey administration process. The results show that many UberHOP riders made UberHOP their primary form of commute mode. Unlike standard ridesourcing services, UberHOP riders predominantly replaced public transportation modes rather than personal vehicles. UberHOP services were canceled in Seattle in August 2016. However, with larger rider densities per trip, the UberHOP model can be profitable, and it is reasonable to expect that Uber or others will resurrect a similar service in the future.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Huet E. Uber’s Global Expansion in Five Seconds. Forbes, Dec. 11, 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2014/12/11/ubers-global-expansion/. Accessed Jan. 13, 2016.
Google Scholar
2. Hallock L., and Inglis J. The Innovative Transportation Index: The Cities Where New Technologies and Tools Can Reduce Your Need to Own a Car. U.S. PIRG Education Fund and Frontier Group. http://www.uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/Innovative_Transportation_Index_USPIRG.pdf. Accessed Feb. 2015.
Google Scholar
3. FAQs for UberHOP. Washington. 2015. https://newsroom.uber.com/us-washington/uberhop-faq/. Accessed July 17, 2016.
Google Scholar
4. Meet UberHOP–A New Way to Commute. Seattle. Dec. 14, 2015. https://newsroom.uber.com/canada/meet-uberhop/. Accessed Jan. 13, 2016.
Google Scholar
5. Meet UberHOP–A New Way to Commute. Toronto. Dec. 14, 2015. https://newsroom.uber.com/toronto/meet-uberhop/. Accessed Jan. 13, 2016.
Google Scholar
6. Washington State Department of Transportation. GeoData Distribution Catalog. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/geodatacatalog/. Accessed July 28, 2016.
Google Scholar
7. Puget Sound Regional Council GIS Shapefiles. http://www.psrc.org/data/gis/shapefiles. Accessed July 28, 2016.
Google Scholar
8. Everything You Need to Know About UberHOP. Washington. Dec. 14, 2015. https://newsroom.uber.com/us-washington/seattle-uberhop-routes/. Accessed Feb. 17, 2016.
Google Scholar
9. Get Around the Metro with UberHOP. Uber MNL Tips. 2016. http://ubermanilatips.com/uberhop-manila-routes/. Accessed July 17, 2016.
Google Scholar
10. UberHop Is Uber’s Latest Idea for Killing Mass Transit. The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/8/9873544/uber-hop-commute-mass-transit-seattle-chicago. Accessed Jan. 13, 2016.
Google Scholar
11. Shared-Use Mobility: What Does the Future Hold? Workshop Synopsis. Innovative Mobility Research. 2015. http://innovativemobility.org/?project=shared-use-mobility-what-does-the-future-hold-workshop-synopsis. Accessed March 2, 2016.
Google Scholar
12. #uberhop Hashtag on Twitter. https://twitter.com/hashtag/uberhop. Accessed Nov. 4, 2016.
Google Scholar
13. Raj A. Uber Plans Bus, Mini-Van Ride Sharing Service in India. 2016. http://www.livemint.com/Companies/DdIguNHRQvrtb7iUtlzhGM/Uber-plans-bus-and-minivan-ride-shares-in-India.html. Accessed Nov. 4, 2016.
Google Scholar
14. Rayle L., Dai D., Chan N., Cervero R., and Shaheen S. Just a Better Taxi? A Survey-Based Comparison of Taxis, Transit, and Ridesourcing Services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, Vol. 45, 2016, pp. 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
Google Scholar
15. Murphy C. TCRP Report J-11: Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit. 2016. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1401765. Accessed July 18, 2016.
Google Scholar
16. Chan N., and Shaheen S. Ridesharing in North America: Past, Present, and Future. Transport Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2012, pp. 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.621557.
Google Scholar
17. Gutierrez S., and SeattlePI.com Staff. Carpooling a Click Away with Online Ridesharing. http://www.seattlepi.com/local/transportation/article/Carpooling-a-click-away-with-online-ridesharing-1458815.php. Accessed July 26, 2016.
Google Scholar
18. Washington State Department of Transportation. RideshareOnline.com. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/transit/rideshare/rideshareonline/. Accessed July 26, 2016.
Google Scholar
19. ORCA LIFT Reduced Fare. Metro Transit, King County. http://kingcounty.gov/depts/transportation/metro/fares-orca/orca-cards/lift.aspx#qualify. Accessed July 28, 2016.
Google Scholar
20. Seattle, Washington. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/places/wa/seattle/. Accessed Aug. 1, 2016.
Google Scholar
21. 2015 Service Guidelines Report. King County Metro Transit, 2015. http://metro.kingcounty.gov/planning/pdf/2011-21/2015/service-guidelines-full-report.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2016.
Google Scholar
22. Schäfer A. Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World. MIT Press, 2009. https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262512343_sch_0001.pdf. Accessed Nov. 15, 2016.
Google Scholar
23. How Much Do Uber Drivers Make in Seattle? I Drive with Uber. 2016. http://www.idrivewithuber.com/how-much-do-uber-drivers-make-in-seattle/. Accessed Nov. 4, 2016.
Google Scholar
24. Financial Annual Performance Measures. King County Metro Online Accountability Center, 2016. http://metro.kingcounty.gov/am/reports/annual-measures/financial.html. Accessed Nov. 14, 2016.
Google Scholar
25. Evans J. E. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Chapter 9: Transit Scheduling and Frequency. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Google Scholar

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 2650, Issue 1
Pages: 101 - 111
Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Elyse O’C. Lewis
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, 201 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700
[email protected]
View all articles by this author
Don MacKenzie
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, 201 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700
View all articles by this author

Notes

E. O’C. Lewis, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 119

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 20

  1. Microtransit adoption in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Does ridesourcing respond to unplanned rail disruptions? A natural exp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Strangers On This Road We Are On: A Literature Review of Pooling in On...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Contested mobility interactions: Characterizing the influence of ride-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The frequency use and the modal shift to ICT-based mobility services
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Contested Mobility Interactions: Characterizing the Influence of Ride-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The influence of ride-hailing on travel frequency and mode choice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Social and trip-level predictors of pooled ride-hailing service adopti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The Automation of the Taxi Industry – Taxi Drivers’ Expectations and A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Investigating socio-spatial differences between solo ridehailing and p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The Association between ICT-Based Mobility Services and Sustainable Mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Are travelers substituting between transportation network companies (T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Socioeconomic and usage characteristics of transportation network comp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. A preliminary assessment of regulatory efforts to steer smart mobility...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. K-Prototypes Segmentation Analysis on Large-Scale Ridesourcing Trip Da...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Modeling the choice to switch from traditional modes to ridesourcing s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an internatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. How Much of Which Mode? Using Revealed Preference Data to Design Mobil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Mobility-on-demand: An empirical study of internet-based ride-hailing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VK...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub
Download PDF

Also from Sage