Planning Approaches in Contracted Fixed-Route Bus Transit Service in the United States: Private Sector’s Role in the Planning Process and Its Influence on Performance Outcomes
Abstract
This study explored the role of planning approaches implemented by agencies that contracted a significant portion of fixed-route bus service and related those planning approaches to service performance. Of particular interest are the rationale behind agency decisions of where to situate planning functions, the role of the contractor in the planning process, and the implications of planning approaches on service cost, quality, and efficiency. Eight cases focused on U.S. transit agencies located in major metropolitan areas that contracted more than 20% of their fixed-route bus service. The authors utilized a combination of agency documents, National Transit Database data, and respondent interviews to uncover the planning approaches employed by each agency and to relate them to key performance indicators. The results show that agencies that do not contract planning functions do so to retain maximum control and oversight of bus service, the role of the contractor in the planning process is augmented as the proportion of contracted service increases, and agencies that employ a strategy with heightened levels of contractor interaction are more likely to experience positive performance outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Black A. Privatization of Urban Transit: A Different Perspective. Transportation Research Record, No. 1297, 1991, pp. 69–75.
2. Iseki H. Effects of Contracting on Cost Efficiency in U.S. Fixed-Route Bus Transit Service. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 7, 2010, pp. 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.003.
3. Winston C. Last Exit: Privatization and Deregulation of the U.S. Transportation System. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2010.
4. Savage I. Evaluation of Competition in the British Local Bus Industry. Transportation Research Record, No. 1064, 1986, pp. 1–10.
5. O’Looney J. A. Outsourcing State and Local Government Services: Decision-Making Strategies and Management Methods. Quorum Books, Westport, Conn., 1998.
6. Sclar E. D. You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 2000.
7. Iseki H. Assessing Research on the Economic Effects of Contracting in the Provision of Fixed-Route Bus Transit Service. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
8. Nicosia N. Essays on Competitive Contracting: An Application to the Mass Transit Industry. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
9. Smirnova O. V., and Leland S. M. Public Transportation and Contracting Out. Public Works Management and Policy, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2014, pp. 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X14545541.
10. Love J., and Cox W. Competitive Contracting of Transit Services. How-To Guide No. 6. Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, Calif., 1993.
11. Black A. Urban Mass Transportation Planning. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
12. Iseki H. Economies of Scale in Bus Transit Service in the USA: How Does Cost Efficiency Vary by Agency Size and Level of Contracting? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1086–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.017.
13. McCullough W. S., Taylor B. D. III, and Wachs M. Transit Service Contracting and Cost-Efficiency. Transportation Research Record, No. 1618, 1998, pp. 69–77. https://doi.org/10.3141/1618-08.
14. Perry J. L., and Babitsky T. T. Comparative Performance in Urban Bus Transit: Assessing Privatization Strategies. Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1986, pp. 57–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/975443.
15. Karlaftis M., and McCarthy P. The Effect of Privatization on Public Transit Costs. Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1999, pp. 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008179629733.
16. DeShazo J. R., and Iseki H. Evaluating the Fiscal Impacts of Privatizing Bus Transit Service in California. School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, 2006.
17. Giuliano G., and Teal R. F. Estimating the Potential Cost Savings of Transit Service Contracting. Transportation Research Record, No. 1108, 1987, pp. 1–11.
18. Denver RTD Privatization Performance Audit Update: July 1990–June 1991. Final report. KPMG Peat Marwick, Denver, Colo., Nov. 1, 1991.
19. Teal R. F. Issues Raised by Competitive Contracting of Bus Transit Service in the U.S.A. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2–4, 1991, pp. 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069108717465.
20. Peskin R. L., Mundle S. R., and Varma P. K. Transit Privatization in Denver: Experience in the Second Year. Transportation Research Record, No. 1402, 1993, pp. 17–24.
21. Karlaftis M. G., Wasson J. S., and Steadham E. E. Impacts of Privatization on the Performance of Urban Transit Systems. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1997, pp. 67–79.
22. Analysis of Private Contractor Bus Service Costs. Regional Transportation District, Denver, Colo., 2001.
23. Shetterly D. R. Contracting for Public Bus Transit: Do Techniques Employed Make a Difference in Service Outcome? Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2002, pp. 73–92.
24. Sclar E. D. Paying More, Getting Less: The Denver Experience with Bus Privatization, 1990–1995. Prepared for Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, Washington, D.C., 1997.
25. Zullo R. Transit Contracting Reexamined: Determinants of Cost Efficiency and Resource Allocation. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007, pp. 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum024.
26. Stanley J. K. Workshop B Report: Creating and Maintaining Trusting Partnerships. In Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport. Selected Papers from 9th International Conference (Thredbo 9), (Macario R., Viegas J., and Hensher D., eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007, pp. 423–436.
27. Currie G. Deregulation, Franchising, Outsourcing, and Corporatisation in Local Public Transit: International Experience. Presented at Market-Oriented Transit Reform Symposium, Tallahassee, Fla., 2012.
28. Litman T. Contrasting Visions of Urban Transport: Critique of Fixing Transit: The Case for Privatization. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2010.
29. Public Transit: Transit Agencies’ Use of Contracting to Provide Service. Report to congressional committees. GAO-13-782. Government Accountability Office, 2013.
30. Iseki H., Rivasplata C. R., Houtman R., and Smith A. Examination of Regional Transit Service Under Contracting: A Case Study in the Greater New Orleans Region. Mineta Transportation Institute, San José State University, San Jose, Calif., 2011.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 38
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
