Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Incorporating a Safety Index into Pathfinding

Abstract

Travelers around the world are concerned with choosing not only the quickest route from one point to another but also the safest route. Traffic safety has always been a major public concern, and traffic safety performance should be constantly evaluated so that both reactive and proactive countermeasures can help reduce crashes. This study developed a methodology for incorporating safety aspects into travelers’ pathfinding process. The safe pathfinding process included two main parts: a route-specific safety hazard index and a route-finding algorithm that considered both travel time and safety. The ratio of the deceleration rate to avoid a crash to the maximum available deceleration rate was chosen as the proxy for traffic safety. The safety hazard index was formulated by using the collision mechanism along the roadway segment and at the intersection. Motorist-specific information (e.g., vehicle type, age, pavement condition) was also included in the safety index model so that a traveler’s individual needs could be considered. The pathfinding algorithm, which combined mobility and safety, had three objectives: shorter travel time, lower route safety hazard index, and avoidance of sites with the highest safety hazard index along the route. The methodology was applied in a real-world street network to demonstrate its use and prove the concept of finding a safe path.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Traffic Safety Facts 2014: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2014.
2. Subramanian R. Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes as a Leading Cause of Death in the United States, 2001. Young, Vol. 1, 2005.
3. Chandra S. Safety-Based Path Finding in Urban Areas for Older Drivers and Bicyclists. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.018.
4. Yang H. Simulation-Based Evaluation of Traffic Safety Performance Using Surrogate Safety Measures. PhD dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., 2012.
5. Toth P., and Vigo D., (eds.). Vehicle Routing: Problems, Methods, and Applications. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa., 2014. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973594.
6. Poon L. Waze Puts Safety Over Speed by Minimizing Left Turns. CityLab, 2016.
7. Kingsbury H., Harris D., and Durdin P. Journey Optimisation by Safest Route. In Taking Action Together: First Australasian Road Safety Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, ARRB, Melbourne, Victoria, Vermont South, Australia, 2015.
8. Chalkia E., Grau J. M. S., Bekiaris E., Ayfandopoulou G., Ferarini C., and Mitsakis E. Routing Algorithms for the Safe Transportation of Pupils to School Using School Buses. In Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment, IFSTTAR, Paris, 2014.
9. Dumbaugh E., and Gattis J. Safe Streets, Livable Streets. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2005, pp. 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976699.
10. So J. J., Dedes G., Park B. B., HosseinyAlamdary S., and Grejner-Brzezinsk D. Development and Evaluation of an Enhanced Surrogate Safety Assessment Framework. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 50, 2015, pp. 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.004.
11. So J., Lim I.-K., and Kweon Y.-J. Exploring Traffic Conflict-Based Surrogate Approach for Safety Assessment of Highway Facilities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2513, 2015, pp. 56–62. https://doi.org/10.3141/2513-07.
12. Kuang Y., Qu X., and Wang S. A Tree-Structured Crash Surrogate Measure for Freeways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.007.
13. Alhajyaseen W. K. The Integration of Conflict Probability and Severity for the Safety Assessment of Intersections. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2015, pp. 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1553-1.
14. Meng Q., and Weng J. Evaluation of Rear-End Crash Risk at Work Zone Using Work Zone Traffic Data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.011.
15. Ozbay K., Yang H., Bartin B., and Mudigonda S. Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, 2008, pp. 105–113. https://doi.org/10.3141/2083-12.
16. Laureshyn A., Svensson Å., and Hydén C. Evaluation of Traffic Safety Based on Micro-Level Behavioural Data: Theoretical Framework and First Implementation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1637–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.021.
17. Dijkstra A. Assessing the Safety of Routes in a Regional Network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 32, 2013, pp. 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.10.008.
18. Larson R. C., and Odoni A. R. Urban Operations Research. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1981.
19. Abul-Magd A. Modeling Highway-Traffic Headway Distributions Using Superstatistics. Physical Review E, Vol. 76, No. 5, 2007, p. 057101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.057101.
20. Dozza M. What Factors Influence Drivers’ Response Time for Evasive Maneuvers in Real Traffic? Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 58, 2013, pp. 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.003.
21. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004.
22. Saccomanno F. F., Cunto F., Guido G., and Vitale A. Comparing Safety at Signalized Intersections and Roundabouts Using Simulated Rear-End Conflicts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2078, 2008, pp. 90–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2078-12.
23. Lord D., Manar A., and Vizioli A. Modeling Crash-Flow-Density and Crash-Flow-V/C Ratio Relationships for Rural and Urban Freeway Segments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.07.003.
24. Aarts L., and Van Schagen I. Driving Speed and the Risk of Road Crashes: A Review. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.004.
25. Son H. D., Kweon Y.-J., and Park B. Development of Crash Prediction Models with Individual Vehicular Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.03.002.
26. Hillier A. Manual for Working with ArcGIS 10. Bepress, Berkeley, Ca., 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhaoxiang He
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, P.O. Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53201-0784
Xiao Qin
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, P.O. Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53201-0784

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 53

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. The Influence of Risk Perception on Visit Decision to Tourism Village:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Safe route-finding: A review of literature and future directions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Accelerating the gradient projection algorithm for solving the non-add...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Integrating safety and mobility for pathfinding using big data generat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A novel skateboarder-related near-crash identification method with roa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub