Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Can Data Generated by Connected Vehicles Enhance Safety?: Proactive Approach to Intersection Safety Management

Abstract

Traditionally, evaluation of intersection safety has been largely reactive and based on historical crash frequency data. However, the emerging data from connected and autonomous vehicles can complement historical data and help in proactively identifying intersections with high levels of variability in instantaneous driving behaviors before the occurrence of crashes. On the basis of data from the Safety Pilot Model Deployment in Ann Arbor, Michigan, this study developed a unique database that integrated intersection crash and inventory data with more than 65 million real-world basic safety messages logged by 3,000 connected vehicles; this database provided a more complete picture of operations and safety performance at intersections. As a proactive safety measure and a leading indicator of safety, location-based volatility was introduced; this quantified variability in instantaneous driving decisions at intersections. Location-based volatility represented the driving performance of connected-vehicle drivers traveling through a specific intersection. As such, with the use of the coefficient of variation as a standardized measure of relative dispersion, location-based volatility was calculated for 116 intersections in Ann Arbor. Rigorous fixed- and random-parameter Poisson regression models were estimated to quantify relationships between intersection-specific volatilities and crash frequencies. Although exposure-related factors were controlled for, the results provided evidence of a statistically significant (at the 5% level) positive association between intersection-specific volatility and crash frequencies for signalized intersections. The implications of these findings for proactive intersection safety management are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Abdel-Aty M., and Haleem K. Analyzing Angle Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Machine Learning Techniques. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2011, pp. 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.002.
2. Persaud B., and Nguyen T. Disaggregate Safety Performance Models for Signalized Intersections on Ontario Provincial Roads. Transportation Research Record, No. 1635, 1998, pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.3141/1635-15.
3. Kamrani M., Abadi S. M. H. E., and Golroudbary S. R. Traffic Simulation of Two Adjacent Unsignalized T-Junctions During Rush Hours Using Arena Software. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 49, 2014, pp. 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.09.006.
4. Khattak A., Nambisan S., and Chakraborty S. Study of Driving Volatility in Connected and Cooperative Vehicle Systems. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2015.
5. Wang X., Khattak A. J., Liu J., Masghati-Amoli G., and Son S. What Is the Level of Volatility in Instantaneous Driving Decisions? Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 58, 2015, pp. 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.014.
6. Liu J., and Khattak A. J. Delivering Improved Alerts, Warnings, and Control Assistance Using Basic Safety Messages Transmitted Between Connected Vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 68, 2016, pp. 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.03.009.
7. Henclewood D. Safety Pilot Model Deployment—One Day Sample Data Environment Data Handbook. Research and Technology Innovation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2014.
8. Osman O. A., and Ishak S. A Network Level Connectivity Robustness Measure for Connected Vehicle Environments. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 53, 2015, pp. 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.023.
9. Ghiasi A., Ma J., Zhou F., and Li X. Speed Harmonization Algorithm Using Connected Autonomous Vehicles. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
10. Li X., Ghiasi A., and Xu Z. Exact Method for a Simplified Trajectory Smoothing Problem with Connected Automated Vehicles. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
11. Bergenhem C., Shladover S., Coelingh E., Englund C., and Tsugawa S. Overview of Platooning Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Oct. 22–26, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
12. Resource Guide Describes Best Practices for Aggressive Driving Enforcement. NHTSA. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. http://www.nhtsa.gov/AboutNHTSA/TrafficTechs/current/Resource+Guide+Describes+Best+Practices+for+Aggressive+Driving+Enforcement. Accessed June 22, 2016.
13. Haglund M., and Aberg L. Speed Choice in Relation to Speed Limit and Influences from Other Drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2000, pp. 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00014-0.
14. Wali B., Ahmed A., Iqbal S., and Hussain A. Effectiveness of Enforcement Level of Speed Limit and Drink Driving Laws and Associated Factors: Exploratory Empirical Analysis Using a Bivariate Ordered Probit Model. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English edition), Vol. 4, No. 3, 2017, pp. 272–279.
15. Paleti R., Eluru N., and Bhat C. R. Examining the Influence of Aggressive Driving Behavior on Driver Injury Severity in Traffic Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1839–1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.005.
16. Chrysler S. T., Cooper J. M., and Marshall D. C. Cost of Warning of Unseen Threats: Unintended Consequences of Connected Vehicle Alerts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2518, 2015, pp. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.3141/2518-11.
17. Genders W., and Razavi S. N. Impact of Connected Vehicle on Work Zone Network Safety Through Dynamic Route Guidance. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000490.
18. Du L., and Dao H. Information Dissemination Delay in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Networks in a Traffic Stream. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015, pp. 66–80.
19. Liu J., Wang X., and Khattak A. Generating Real-Time Driving Volatility Information. Presented at 2014 World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Detroit, Mich., 2014.
20. Lord D., and Mannering F. The Statistical Analysis of Crash-Frequency Data: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2010, pp. 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.001.
21. Anastasopoulos P. C., and Mannering F. L. A Note on Modeling Vehicle Accident Frequencies with Random-Parameters Count Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.10.005.
22. Li X., Khattak A. J., and Wali B. Role of Multiagency Response and On-Scene Times in Large-Scale Traffic Incidents. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2616, 2017, pp. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3141/2616-05.
23. Khattak A. J., Liu J., Wali B., Li X., and Ng M. Modeling Traffic Incident Duration Using Quantile Regression. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2554, 2016, pp. 139–148. https://doi.org/10.3141/2554-15.
24. Greene W. H. Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2003.
25. Abdel-Aty M., and Keller J. Exploring the Overall and Specific Crash Severity Levels at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2005, pp. 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.002.
26. Schneider R. J., Ryznar R. M., and Khattak A. J. An Accident Waiting to Happen: A Spatial Approach to Proactive Pedestrian Planning. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2004, pp. 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00149-5.
27. Mannering F. L., and Bhat C. R. Analytic Methods in Accident Research: Methodological Frontier and Future Directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 1, 2014, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2013.09.001.
28. Washington S. P., Karlaftis M. G., and Mannering F. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2010.
29. Ye X., Pendyala R. M., Washington S. P., Konduri K., and Oh J. A Simultaneous Equations Model of Crash Frequency by Collision Type for Rural Intersections. Safety Science, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2009, pp. 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.06.007.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohsen Kamrani
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tickle College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 325 John Tickle Building, 851 Neyland Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Behram Wali
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tickle College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 325 John Tickle Building, 851 Neyland Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Asad J. Khattak
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tickle College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 325 John Tickle Building, 851 Neyland Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996

Notes

A. J. Khattak, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 348

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 41

  1. Extracting driving volatility from connected vehicle data in exploring...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Driving Performance Evaluation based on Driving Volatility Measures – ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A mixed capacity analysis and lane management model considering platoo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Examining Individualistic Driving Volatility Changes During and One Ye...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Drivers’ reactions to connected vehicle forward collision warnings: Le...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Incorporating driving volatility measures in safety performance functi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Machine Learning Framework for Real-Time Assessment of Traffic Safety ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. An In-Vehicle Warning Information Provision Strategy for V2V-Based Pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Impact of Connected Automated Buses in a Mixed Fleet Scenario With Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Do Larger Sample Sizes Increase the Reliability of Traffic Incident Du...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Connected vehicle-based road safety information system (CROSS): Framew...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Estimation of safety performance functions for urban intersections usi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Automated cooperative control of multilane freeway merging areas in co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The relationship between driving volatility in time to collision and c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Review of Usage of Real-World Connected Vehicle Data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Identification of safety benefits by inter-vehicle crash risk analysis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Integrating safety and mobility for pathfinding using big data generat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Safety, Energy, and Emissions Impacts of Adaptive Cruise Control and C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The extent of reliability for vehicle-to-vehicle communication in safe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Harnessing ambient sensing & naturalistic driving systems to understan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Long short‐term memory and convolutional neural network for abnormal d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The impacts of connected vehicle technology on network-wide traffic op...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Influence of Lane Policies on Freeway Traffic Mixed with Manual and Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Informed decision-making by integrating historical on-road driving per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Exploring microscopic driving volatility in naturalistic driving envir...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Examining correlations between motorcyclist’s conspicuity, apparel rel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. A mixed traffic speed harmonization model with connected autonomous ve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. How instantaneous driving behavior contributes to crashes at intersect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. An analysis of highway work zone safety practices in Pakistan
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Development of Safety Performance Functions: Incorporating Unobserved ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Extracting Useful Information from Basic Safety Message Data: An Empir...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Investigating the Impact of Fog on Freeway Speed Selection using the S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. A comparative study of rail-pedestrian trespassing crash injury severi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. An ordered-probit analysis of enforcement of road speed limits
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. How is driving volatility related to intersection safety? A Bayesian h...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Analysis of volatility in driving regimes extracted from basic safety ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Role of Multiagency Response and On-Scene Times in Large-Scale Traffic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub