Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Investigation of the Effect of Super Sharrows on Cyclist and Vehicle Behavior

Abstract

This study examined the potential effect of special paintings of shared lane markings (super sharrows) on a number of operational and safety performance parameters for cyclists and motor vehicles. These performance parameters were used to assess pretreatment and posttreatment behavior when cyclists and motor vehicles were near one another. The performance parameters were (a) rate of lane change maneuvers performed by vehicles in the presence as well as the absence of cyclists and (b) lateral spacing between cyclists, vehicles, and curb edge. In general, the main objectives of this treatment were (a) providing cyclists with comfort by allowing them to ride in the middle of the travel lane and (b) promoting safe passing by motor vehicles. The effect of the super sharrows on cyclists and motor vehicles was analyzed with statistical analysis by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment conditions. The key findings are as follow: (a) super sharrows had an effect on motor vehicle lane change maneuvers, represented by an increase in the percentage of motor vehicles that changed from the right lane (location of super sharrows) to the left lane with the presence of a cyclist on the right lane; (b) the number of motor vehicles that changed from right lane to left lane and back to right lane in both full and partial encroachment into the left lane decreased; (c) the number of the motor vehicle lane change maneuvers from left to right lane decreased; and (d) cyclists were found to be riding farther from the right curb with the presence of the super sharrows.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser University. Cycling Safety Study: Summary Report. City of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2015.
2. Hunter W. W., Srinivasan R., Thomas L., Martell C. A., and Seiderman C. B. Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2247, 2011, pp. 72–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/2247-09.
3. Jacobson M., Skene M., Davidson G., and Rawsthorne D. An Overview of Shared Use Lane Pavement Markings for Cyclists. In 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada: Transportation in a Climate of Change, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2009.
4. Furth P. G., Dulaski D. M., Bergenthal D., and Brown S. More Than Sharrows: Lane-Within-A-Lane Bicycle Priority Treatments in Three U.S. Cities. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
5. Mackay J. Denver Bicycle Master Plan. Department of Public Works, City and County of Denver, Colo., 1993.
6. Pein W. E., Hunter W. W., Stewart R. J. Evaluation of the Shared-Use Arrow. Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Section, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Dec. 1999.
7. Caird J. K., Milloy S., Ohlhauser A., Jacobson M., Skene M., and Morrall J. Evaluation of Four Bicycle Lane Treatments Using Driving Simulation: Comprehension and Driving Performance Results. Presented at Annual Conference of Canadian Road Safety Professionals, Whistler, British Columbia, 2008.
8. Results of Survey to Determine Shared Lane Pavement Markings. Final report. Pittsburgh Department of City Planning; Bike Pittsburgh, Pa., May 2008.
9. Hunter W. W., Stewart J. R., and Stutts J. C. Study of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, 1999, pp. 70–77. https://doi.org/10.3141/1674-10.
10. San Francisco’s Shared Lane Pavement Markings: Improving Bicycle Safety. Final report. San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic, Calif., 2004.
11. Foletta N, Nielson C., Patton J., Parks J., and Rees R. Green Shared Lane Markings on Urban Arterial in Oakland, California: Evaluation of Super Sharrows. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2492, 2015, pp. 61–68. https://doi.org/10.3141/2492-07.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Kassim
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Design, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
Karim Ismail
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Design, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
Suzanne Woo
Transportation Services, City of Ottawa, 100 Constellation Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K2G 6J8, Canada

Notes

A. Kassim, [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 75

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Stuck in a (literal) tight spot: Cycling between tram rails, sharrows ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Accounting for drivers’ bicycling frequency and familiarity with bicyc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Operational Evaluation of Central Sharrows and Dooring Zone Treatment ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Evaluation of bicycle sharrows within the Norwegian context
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub