Where Do Bikeshare Bikes Actually Go?: Analysis of Capital Bikeshare Trips with GPS Data
Abstract
Bikeshare systems with docking stations have gained popularity in cities throughout the United States—and have increased from six programs with 2,300 bikes in 2010 to 74 systems with 32,200 bikes in 2016. Even though bikeshare systems generate a wealth of data about bicycle checkout and check-in locations and times at docking stations, virtually nothing is known about routes and activities undertaken between checkout and check-in. Such information could greatly enhance expansion of bikeshare systems, placement of new docking stations, and location of new bike lanes and paths. In pursuit of such information, the District Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., placed GPS trackers on 94 Capital Bikeshare (CaBi) bikes in the spring of 2015. On the basis of these data, this geographic information system analysis distinguished riders by type of CaBi membership, identified popular routes, analyzed bicycle infrastructure use, and examined stops and dwelling times at places of interest. Results showed strong differences in trip attributes between types of membership. Trips taken by short-term users were longer in distance, slower than long-term users’ trips, and concentrated in and around the National Mall, whereas long-term users’ trips were concentrated in mixed-use neighborhoods. Short-term users rode 12% of their miles on dedicated bicycle infrastructure, 61% in parks, and 27% on roadways with motorized traffic, whereas for long-term members the percentages were 33%, 17%, and 50%, respectively. On the basis of the routes taken in this study, potential locations were recommended for bicycle infrastructure improvements and new bikeshare stations.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Pucher J. R., and Buehler R. City Cycling. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2012.
2. Shaheen S. A., Guzman S., and Zhang H. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, 2010, pp. 159–167. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20.
3. Shaheen S. A., Guzman S., and Zhang H. Bikesharing Across the Globe. In City Cycling (Pucher J. and Buehler R., eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2012.
4. Fishman E., Washington S., Haworth N., and Watson A. Factors Influencing Bike Share Membership: An Analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 71, 2015, pp. 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.021.
5. Buck D., Buehler R., Happ P., Rawls B., Chung P., and Borecki N. Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-Term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, D.C., Region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2387, 2013, pp. 112–119. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-13.
6. Meddin R., and DeMaio P. The Bike-Sharing World Map. http://www.bikesharingworld.com. April 2016.
7. Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study: A Closer Look at Casual Users. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 2012.
8. 2014 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report. LDA Consulting, Washington, D.C., 2015.
9. District of Columbia Bike Program Fact Sheet. District Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2014.
10. 2014 Visitor Statistics. Destination DC, Washington, D.C., 2015. https://washington.org/DC-information/about-destination-dc.
11. Khatri R. Modeling Route Choice of Utilitarian Bikeshare Users from GPS Data. MS thesis. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2015.
12. Buehler R., and Dill J. Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling. Transport Reviews, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2016, pp. 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908.
13. Hudson J. G., Duthie J., Rathod Y., Larsen K. A., and Meyer J. L. Using Smartphones to Collect Bicycle Travel Data in Texas. Final Report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, 2012.
14. Broach J., Dill J., and Gliebe J. Where Do Cyclists Ride? A Route Choice Model Developed with Revealed Preference GPS Data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1730–1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.07.005.
15. Krenn P. J., Oja P., and Titze S. Route Choices of Transport Bicyclists: A Comparison of Actually Used and Shortest Routes. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-31.
16. Dill J., and Gliebe J. Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: A Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice. Final report. OTREC-RR-08-03. Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium, Portland, 2008.
17. Harrison F., Burgoine T., Corder K., van Sluijs E. M. F., and Jones A. How Well Do Modelled Routes to School Record the Environments Children Are Exposed To? A Cross-Sectional Comparison of GIS-Modelled and GPS-Measured Routes to School. International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-5.
18. Hood J., Sall E., and Charlton B. A GPS-Based Bicycle Route Choice Model for San Francisco, California. Transportation Letters, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011, pp. 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2011.03.01.63-75.
19. Melson C. L., Duthie J. C., and Boyles S. D. Influence of Bridge Facility Attributes on Bicycle Travel Behavior. ITE Journal, Vol. 83, No. 10, 2013, pp. 36–41.
20. Halldórsdóttir K., Rieser-Schussler N., Axhausen K. W., Nielsen O. A., and Prato C. G. Efficiency of Choice Set Generation Methods for Bicycle Routes. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2014, pp. 332–348.
21. Menghini G., Carrasco N., Schüssler N., and Axhausen K. W. Route Choice of Cyclists in Zurich. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 9, 2010, pp. 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.008.
22. Parkes S. D., Marsden G., Shaheen S. A., and Cohen A. P. Understanding the Diffusion of Public Bikesharing Systems: Evidence from Europe and North America. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 31, 2013, pp. 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.003.
23. Fishman E. Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature. Transport Reviews, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2016, pp. 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036.
24. Dalumpines R., and Scott D. M. GIS-Based Map-Matching: Development and Demonstration of a Postprocessing Map-Matching Algorithm for Transportation Research. In Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World (Geertman S., Reinhardt W., and Toppen F., eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011, pp. 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19789-5_6.
25. Kerr J., Duncan S., and Schipperjin J. Using Global Positioning Systems in Health Research: A Practical Approach to Data Collection and Processing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2011, pp. 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.017.
26. Krenn P. J., Titze S., Oja P., Jones A., and Ogilvie D. Use of Global Positioning Systems to Study Physical Activity and the Environment: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2011, pp. 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.046.
27. Schuessler N., and Axhausen K. W. Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems Without Additional Information. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2105, 2009, pp. 28–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2105-04.
28. Shaheen S., Martin E. W., Chan N. D., Cohen A. P., and Pogodzinski M. Public Bikesharing in North America During a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends, and User Impacts. MTI Report 12-29. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2014.
29. Ursaki J., and Aultman-Hall L. Quantifying the Equity of Bikeshare Access in U.S. Cities. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 318
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 32
- Studying shared bike route choice behavior using a bike-sharing system...
- Investigating the impacts of bike lanes on bike share ridership: A hol...
- Station Reallocation and Rebalancing Strategy for Bike-Sharing Systems...
- Understanding bike-sharing mobility patterns in response to the COVID-...
- Shared E-Scooter Trajectory Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic in A...
- A before-after impact assessment of COVID-19 outbreak on bike-sharing ...
- A Promising Methodological Approach to Identifying Areas with the Grea...
- Equitable, inclusive and sustainable public transit mobility through m...
- Research on the Impact of COVID-19 on Micromobility Using Statistical ...
- Using Global Positioning System Big Data to Define a Bikeshare User Ty...
- Role detection in bicycle-sharing networks using multilayer stochastic...
- Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago
- How did micro-mobility change in response to COVID-19 pandemic? A case...
- Fast and efficient discovery of key bike stations in bike sharing syst...
- Analysis on bike-share ridership for origin-destination pairs: Effects...
- Examining the effects of the built environment on topological properti...
- Crowdsourced data for bicycling research and practice
- Understanding the bike sharing travel demand and cycle lane network: T...
- A Prediction of Bike Flow in Bike Renting Systems with the Tensor Mode...
- Bisiklet Paylaşımı Büyük Veri Kümelerinde Kullanıcıların İstasyon Terc...
- Diffusion behavior in a docked bike-sharing system
- Electric Bicycle-Sharing: A New Competitor in the Urban Transportation...
- Dynamic Scheduling Based on Predicted Inventory Variation Rate for Pub...
- Potentiels et limites des traces (géo)numériques dans l’analyse des mo...
- Potentials and limits of (geo)digital footprints in mobility analysis:...
- Why do bicyclists take detours? A multilevel regression model using sm...
- Safe Cycle: Infrastructural Control for Bikers
- Understanding bike share cyclist route choice using GPS data: Comparin...
- Usages des traces numériques en géographie : potentiels heuristiques e...
- Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice—A System...
- Enrichment of OpenStreetMap Data Completeness with Sidewalk Geometries...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
