Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2017

Mediation Effects of Income on Travel Mode Choice: Analysis of Short-Distance Trips Based on Path Analysis with Multiple Discrete Outcomes

Abstract

Effects of income on travel behavior have been widely examined in the literature; however, a majority of existing studies focused mainly on the direct effects of income and neglected the indirect effects. This focus is especially true in the context of developing countries in which income per capita is increasing rapidly. Effects of income on travel behavior may be observed through its impacts on other life choices. Such indirect effects are called “mediation effects” in this study. To fill the foregoing research gap, this study focused on travel mode choice in the Hanoi metropolitan area of Vietnam and developed a path model with multiple discrete choices. In the path model, mediation effects of income on travel mode choice were captured by modeling residential location choice as a discrete mediator that generated nonlinear indirect effects of income on mode choice (the proposed model is called the “mediation model”). As a comparison, a joint model of residential location and travel mode choices was built with only direct effects of income on both types of choice. Based on data collected at three new urban areas in Hanoi in 2015, model estimation results confirm the existence of both direct effects and mediation effects of income on mode choice. Simulation analyses further show that as income increases, the share of motorcycles sharply decreases up to a certain level of income; however, it rises after that level.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jara-Díaz S. R. Income and Taste in Mode Choice Models: Are They Surrogates? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1991, pp. 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(91)90027-G.
2. Jara-Díaz S. R., and Videla J. Detection of Income Effect in Mode Choice: Theory and Application. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1989, pp. 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(89)90040-4.
3. Zhang J., Fujiwara A., and Thein S. Capturing Travelers’ Stated Mode Choice Preferences Under Influence of Income in Yangon City, Myanmar. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2008, pp. 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(08)60032-X.
4. Srinivasan S., and Rogers P. Travel Behavior of Low-Income Residents: Studying Two Contrasting Locations in the City of Chennai, India. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2005, pp. 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.008.
5. Srinivasan K., Pradhan G., and Naidu G. Commute Mode Choice in a Developing Country: Role of Subjective Factors and Variations in Responsiveness Across Captive, Semicaptive, and Choice Segments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2038, 2007, pp. 53–61. https://doi.org/10.3141/2038-07.
6. Abane A. Mode Choice for the Journey to Work Among Formal Sector Employees in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1993, pp. 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(93)90046-3.
7. Enam A., and Choudhury C. Methodological Issues in Developing Mode Choice Models for Dhaka, Bangladesh. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2239, 2011, pp. 84–92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2239-10.
8. Srinivasan K., Bhargav P., Ramadurai G., Muthuram V., and Srinivasan S. Determinants of Changes in Mobility and Travel Patterns in Developing Countries: Case Study of Chennai, India. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2038, 2007, pp. 42–52. https://doi.org/10.3141/2038-06.
9. Pan H., Shen Q., and Zhang M. Influence of Urban Form on Travel Behaviour in Four Neighbourhoods of Shanghai. Housing Studies, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2009, pp. 275–294.
10. Alpizar F., and Carlsson F. Policy Implications and Analysis of the Determinants of Travel Mode Choice: An Application of Choice Experiments to Metropolitan Costa Rica. Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 8, No. 04, 2003, pp. 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X0300329.
11. Kumar M., and Rao K. K. Disaggregate Mode Choice and Departure Time Choice Models for Thane City of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India. Presented at 11th World Conference on Transport Research, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
12. Koppelman F. S., and Bhat C. A Self-Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models. FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
13. Yagi S., and Mohammadian A. Joint Models of Home-Based Tour Mode and Destination Choices: Applications to a Developing Country. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2076, 2008, pp. 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3141/2076-04.
14. Dissanayake D., and Morikawa T. Household Travel Behavior in Developing Countries: Nested Logit Model of Vehicle Ownership, Mode Choice, and Trip Chaining. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, 2002, pp. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.3141/1805-06.
15. Tuan V. A. Mode Choice Behavior and Modal Shift to Public Transport in Developing Countries: The Case of Hanoi City. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 11, 2015, pp. 473–487.
16. Bhat C. R. Accommodating Variations in Responsiveness to Level-of-Service Measures in Travel Mode Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1998, pp. 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00011-1.
17. Saha D. Development of a Mode Choice Model Considering Heterogeneous Traffic of Dhaka City. Master’s thesis. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 2010.
18. Stephanedes Y. J., Kumar V., and Padmanabhan B. A Fully Disaggregate Mode-Choice Model for Business Intercity Travel. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1984, pp. 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081068408717265.
19. Mokhtarian P. L., and Cao X. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: A Focus on Methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, pp. 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006.
20. Litman T. Land Use Impacts on Transport: How Land Use Factors Affect Travel Behavior. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2005. http://www.vtpi.org/landtravel.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2017.
21. Bhat C. R., and Guo J. Y. A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 506–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.12.005.
22. Tran M. T., Zhang J., Chikaraishi M., and Fujiwara A. A Joint Analysis of Residential Location, Work Location, and Commuting Mode Choices in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 54, 2016, pp. 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.003.
23. Paleti R., Bhat C., and Pendyala R. Integrated Model of Residential Location, Work Location, Vehicle Ownership, and Commute Tour Characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2382, 2013, pp. 162–172. https://doi.org/10.3141/2382-18.
24. Yang M., Li D., Wang W., Zhao J., and Chen X. Modeling Gender-Based Differences in Mode Choice Considering Time-Use Pattern: Analysis of Bicycle, Public Transit, and Car Use in Suzhou, China. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/706918.
25. Van Acker V., and Witlox F. Car Ownership as a Mediating Variable in Car Travel Behaviour Research Using a Structural Equation Modelling Approach to Identify Its Dual Relationship. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010, pp. 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.006.
26. Ben-Akiva M. E., and Lerman S. R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
27. Temme D., Paulssen M., and Dannewald T. Incorporating Latent Variables into Discrete Choice Models: A Simultaneous Estimation Approach Using SEM Software. Business Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03343535.
28. Politis I., Papaioannou P., and Basbas S. Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Models for Evaluating Flexible Transport Mode Choice. Research in Transportation Business and Management, Vol. 3, 2012, pp. 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.06.007.
29. Atasoy B., Glerum A., and Bierlaire M. Attitudes Towards Mode Choice in Switzerland. Planning Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2013, pp. 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2013.827518.
30. Soto J. J., Cantillo V., and Arellana J. Hybrid Choice Modeling of Alternative Fueled Vehicles in Colombian Cities Including Second Order Structural Equations. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
31. Muthén B. A General Structural Equation Model with Dichotomous, Ordered Categorical, and Continuous Latent Variable Indicators. Psychometrika, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1984, pp. 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294210.
32. Daly A., Hess S., Patruni B., Potoglou D., and Rohr C. Using Ordered Attitudinal Indicators in a Latent Variable Choice Model: A Study of the Impact of Security on Rail Travel Behaviour. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2012, pp. 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z.
33. Dekker T., Hess S., Arentze T., and Chorus C. Incorporating Needs—Satisfaction and Regret—Minimization in a Discrete Choice Model of Leisure Activities. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
34. Pinjari A. R., Pendyala R. M., Bhat C. R., and Waddell P. A. Modeling the Choice Continuum: An Integrated Model of Residential Location, Auto Ownership, Bicycle Ownership, and Commute Tour Mode Choice Decisions. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011, pp. 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9360-y.
35. Rose B. M., Holmbeck G. N., Coakley R. M., and Franks E. A. Mediator and Moderator Effects in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatric Research. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2004, pp. 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200402000-00013.
36. Wu A. D., and Zumbo B. D. Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2008, pp. 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1.
37. Fairchild A. J., and MacKinnon D. P. A General Model for Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects. Prevention Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2009, pp. 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0109-6.
38. MacKinnon D. P., Lockwood C. M., Hoffman J. M., West S. G., and Sheets V. A Comparison of Methods to Test Mediation and Other Intervening Variable Effects. Psychological Methods, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, pp. 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.
39. Baron R. M., and Kenny D. A. The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, 1986, pp. 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
40. Frazier P. A., Tix A. P., and Barron K. E. Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2004, pp. 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115.
41. Edwards J. R., and Lambert L. S. Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation: A General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis. Psychological Methods, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1.
42. Hayes A. F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press, New York, 2013.
43. Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., and Fong G. T. Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 6, 2005, pp. 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845.
44. MacKinnon D. P., Warsi G., and Dwyer J. H. A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1995, pp. 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3.
45. Frölich M., and Huber M. Direct and Indirect Treatment Effects: Causal Chains and Mediation Analysis with Instrumental Variables. Discussion 8280. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany, 2014.
46. Imai K., Keele L., and Yamamoto T. Identification, Inference, and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects. Statistical Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2010, pp. 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS321.
47. Imai K., Keele L., and Tingley D. A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychological Methods, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2010, pp. 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761.
48. Muthén B. Applications of Causally Defined Direct and Indirect Effects in Mediation Analysis Using SEM in Mplus. Mplus, 2011. https://www.statmodel.com/examples/penn.shtml#extendSEM.
49. Ward K. The World in 2050. Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank Corporation, Hong Kong, 2012.
50. Zhang J. Revisiting Residential Self-Selection Issues: A Life-Oriented Approach. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2014, pp. 29–45. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.460.
51. Zhang J. Life-Oriented Behavioral Research for Urban Policy. Springer, New York, 2016.
52. Zhang J. The Life-Oriented Approach and Travel Behavior Research. Presented at 14th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Windsor, United Kingdom, 2015.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2017
Issue published: January 2017

Rights and permissions

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hong T. A. Nguyen
Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan
Makoto Chikaraishi
Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan
Akimasa Fujiwara
Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan
Junyi Zhang
Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 181

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Households with constrained off-street parking drive fewer miles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The Importance of Importance Sampling: Exploring Methods of Sampling f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Estimating the Modal Split Ratios of Square Visitors in the Case of Is...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Ulaşımdaki Türel Dağılımın Kamusal Alanlara Erişimdeki Etkisi
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Influence of Social Constraints, Mobility Incentives, and Restrictions...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Structural equation modeling of public transport use with COVID-19 pre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Short-Term Prediction of Demand for Ride-Hailing Services: A Deep Lear...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A framework for estimating crime location choice based on awareness sp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Pedestrian overpass use and its relationships with digital and social ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub