Gender and Ethnic bias in Letters of Recommendation: Considerations for School Counselors
Abstract
School counselors write letters of recommendation for students pursuing postsecondary education and help teachers and staff prepare for this task. Although letters of recommendation may impact admission and scholarship opportunities, research about equity and bias in letters is minimal as compared to standardized tests, teacher expectations, and grading practices. In this study, researchers analyzed letters of recommendation for evidence of gender and racial bias. Results demonstrate small but significant differences by gender and race in the average length of letters as well as the types of language used to describe students. This article discusses implications for school counselors.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Akos P., Lambie G., & Milsom A. (2007). Early adolescents' aspirations and academic tracking: An exploratory investigation. Professional School Counseling, 11, 57–64.
American School Counselor Association. (2012). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Azen R., Bronner S., & Gafni N. (2002). Examination of gender bias in university admissions. Applied Measurement in Education, 15 (1), 75–94.
Belasco A. (2013). Creating college opportunity: School counselors and their influence on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 54, 781–804.
Bergen D. J., & Williams J. E. (1991). Sex stereotypes in the United States revisited: 1972–1988. Sex Roles, 24, 413–423.
Bouton L. F. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of the structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 211–244.
Cejka M. A., & Eagly A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.
Clinedinst M., Hurley S., & Hawkins D. (2011). State of college admission 2011. Washington, DC: National Association for College Admissions.
The College Board. (2016). How to get a great letter of recommendation. Retrieved from https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/get-in/your-high-school-record/how-to-get-a-great-letter-of-recommendation.
Devine P. G., & Elliot A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (11), 1139–1150.
Devine P. G., Plant E. A., & Buswell B. N. (2000). Breaking the prejudice habit: progress and obstacles. In Oskamp S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 185–208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Eagly A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly A. H., Wood W., & Diekman A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes T. & Trautner H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Feingold A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.
Ferguson R. F. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. In Jencks C. and Phillips M. (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 273–317). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Freedle R. (2003). Correcting the SAT's ethnic and social-class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 73 (1), 1–44.
Harris E. A. (2014, December 26). Little guidance: 500 students per counselor. New York Times, pp. A1-A3.
Jones D. (1990). College letters of recommendation: A staff development opportunity. School Counselor, 90, 153–156.
Kite M. E., Deaux K., & Haines E. L. (2007). Gender stereotypes. In Denmark F. L. & Paludi M. A. (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 205–236). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Knouse S. B. (1983). The letter of recommendation: Specificity and favorability of information. Personnel Psychology, 36, 331–341.
Kuncel N., Kochevar R., & Ones D. (2014). A meta-analysis of letters of recommendation in college and graduate admissions: Reasons for hope. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22 (1), 101–108.
LaCroix P. (1985). Sex in recs: Gender bias in recommendation writing. Journal of College Admissions, 108, 24–26.
Lemm K. & Banaji M. R. (1999). Unconscious attitudes and beliefs about women and men. In Pasero U. & Braun F. (Eds.), Perceiving and performing gender (pp. 215–233). Opladen, Germany: Westdutscher Verlag.
Lueptow L. B., Garovich-Szabo L., & Lueptow M. B. (2001). Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80, 1–36.
Madera J. M., Hebl M. R., & Martin R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591–1599.
McKown C., & Weinstein R. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235–261.
National Association for College Admissions Counselors. (2012). Fundamentals of college admissions counseling (3rd ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
National Association for College Admissions Counselors. (2014). State of college admissions report. Arlington, VA: Author.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/equity/Section4.asp
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Historical summary of faculty, students, degrees, and finances in degree-granting institutions: Selected years, 1869–70 through 2005–06. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_178.asp
National Girls Collaborative Project. (2016). The state of girls and women in STEM. Retrieved from https://ngcproject.org/sites/default/files/ngcp_the_state_of_girls_and_women_in_stem_2016_final.pdf
Nosek B. A., Banaji M. R., & Greenwald A. G. (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math <> Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59.
Nosek B. A., Symth F. L., Hansen J. J., Devos T., Lindner N. M., Ranganath K. A., … Banaji M.R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 1–53.
Pennebaker J. W., Francis M. E., & Booth R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2001): A computerized text analysis program. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reyna C. (2008). Ian is intelligent but Leshaun is lazy: Antecedents and consequences of attributional stereotypes in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXIII, 439–458.
Rudman L. A., & Glick P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.
Rudman L. A., & Glick P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
Schmader T., Whitehead J., & Wysocki V. H. (2007). A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles, 57, 509–514.
Swim J. K., & Sanna L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–519.
Trix F., & Psenka C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and Society, 14, 191–220.
Valian V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Von Bargen D. (2014). Tips for writing letters of recommendation. ASCA School Counselor, D5-D7.
Wood W., & Eagly A. H. (2010). Gender. In Fiske S. T., Gilbert D. T., & Lindzey G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 629–667). New York, NY: Wiley.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: February 15, 2018
Issue published: September 2016-August 2017
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Professional School Counseling.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 876
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 15
- What’s in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT
- Helping High-Achieving, Low-Income, Black Students Gain Admission Into America’s Elite Colleges: Considerations for School Counselors
- Gender and culture bias in letters of recommendation for computer science and data science masters programs
- Nice, but not smart? Attributional backlash from displaying prosocial behavior in the classroom
- Gender bias in medical education: A scoping review
- The relationship between required physician letters of recommendation and decreasing diversity in osteopathic medical school admissions
- Blok Zinciri Tabanlı Akademik Tavsiye Mektubu Sistemi ModeliBlockchain Based Academic Letter of Recommendation System Model
- Increasing Clinician-Scientist Workforce Diversity through the National Institute of General Medical Sciences’ Medical Scientist Training Program
- Impact of Surgeon Gender and Seniority in use of Agentic and Communal Language in Letters of Recommendation for Surgery Residency Applicants
- Beginning with the end in mind: Meaningful and intentional endings to equitable partnerships in science education
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
ASCA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
ASCA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
