Abstract
The purpose of this study was to revisit the trait and belief approaches tested by Huddy and Terkildsen (1993a, 1993b) to determine to what extent these are still used by voters in evaluating female and male candidates, particularly after exposure to campaign communication run on behalf of the candidates. Through an experimental design, participants were exposed to candidate’s advertising in two mixed-gender congressional races from the 2008 election cycle. The results indicate that traditional trait stereotypes continue to be generated in the evaluation of female candidates, although the generation of belief (policy) stereotypes are more complicated. Whereas party affiliation influences perceptions of issue competency, vote choice also produces effects on both trait evaluations and perceptions of issue competency. These results ultimately suggest that voters’ application of belief and trait stereotypes encourages still further study by scholars and consideration by female candidates running for office.
|
Alexander, D. , & Andersen, K. ( 1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits . Political Research Quarterly, 46, 527-545. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Banwart, M.C. ( 2006). WebStyles in 2004: The gendering of candidates on campaign web sites? In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the web’s role in campaign 2004 (pp. 37-55). New York, NY: Roman and Littlefield. Google Scholar | |
|
Banwart, M.C. , & McKinney, M.S. (2005). A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States Senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies, 56(4), 353-373. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Broverman, I.K. , Vogel, S.R. , Broverman, D.M. , Clarkson, F.E. , & Rosenkrantz, P.S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59-78. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Burrell, B.C. ( 1992). Women candidates in open seat primaries for the U.S. House: 1968-1990. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 493-508. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bystrom, D. , Banwart, M.C. , Kaid, L.L. , & Robertson, T.A. (2004). Gender and political candidate communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, and NewsStyle. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Carroll, S.J. ( 1994). Women as candidates in American politics (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Center for American Women and Politics. (2008 a). Record numbers of women to serve in Senate and House. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/press_room/news/documents/PressRelease_11-5-08updated.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Center for American Women and Politics. (2008 b). Summary of women candidates 2008. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/documents/CanSum08.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Center for American Women and Politics. (2009 ). The 2008 presidential campaign of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/preswatch_clinton.php Google Scholar | |
|
Deloitte and Touche. (2000). Women in elected office. New York, NY: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Denton, R.E. , & Kuypers, J.A. ( 2008). Politics and communication in America: Campaigns, media, and governing in the 21st century. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Dolan, K. ( 1997). Gender differences in support for women candidates: Is there a glass ceiling in American politics? Women and Politics , 17, 27-41. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dolan, K. ( 2004). The impact of candidate sex on evaluations of candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly , 85, 206-217. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dolan, K. ( 2005). Do women candidates play to gender stereotypes? Do men candidates play to women? Candidate sex and issues priorities on campaign websites. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 31-44. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Dolan, K. ( 2006). Symbolic mobilization? The impact of candidate sex in American elections. American Politics Research, 34, 687-704. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Duerst-Lahti, G. ( 1998). The bottleneck: Women becoming candidates. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office (pp. 15-25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Eagly, A.H. , & Mladinic, A. ( 1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Falk, E. , & Kenski, K. ( 2006). Issue saliency and gender stereotypes: Support for women as presidents in times of war and terrorism. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 1-18. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fox, R.L. ( 2000). Gender and congressional elections. In S. Tolleson-Rinehart & J. J. Joseph-son (Eds.), Gender and American politics: Women, men, and the political process (pp. 227-256). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar | |
|
Funk, C.L. ( 1997). Implications of political expertise in candidate trait evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 675-697. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Heith, D.J. ( 2001). Footwear, lipstick, and an Orthodox Sabbath: Media coverage of nontraditional candidates. White House Studies, 1, 335-349. Google Scholar | |
|
Heldman, C. , Carroll, S.J. , & Olson, S. ( 2005). "She brought only a skirt": Print media coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s bid for the Republican presidential nomination. Political Communication, 22, 315-335. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hitchon, J.C. , & Chang, C. ( 1995). Effects of gender schematic processing on the reception of political commercials for men and women candidates. Communication Research, 22, 430-459. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hitchon, J.C. , Chang, C. , & Harris, R. ( 1997). Should women emote? Perceptual bias and opinion change in response to political ads for candidates of different genders. Political Communication, 14, 49-69. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Huddy, L. , & Terkildsen, N.S. (1993a). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 503-525. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Huddy, L. , & Terkildsen, N.S. (1993b). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119-147. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jamieson, K.H. ( 1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kenski, K. , & Falk, E. ( 2004). Of what is that glass ceiling made? A study of attitudes about women and the Oval Office. Women and Politics, 26, 57-80. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kern, M. , & Edley, P.P. ( 1994). Women candidates going public: The 30-second format. Argumentation and Advocacy, 31, 80-95. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
King, D.C. , & Matland, R.E. ( 2003). Sex and the Grand Old Party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31, 595-612. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Koch, J.W. ( 1999). Candidate gender and assessments of Senate candidates . Social Science Quarterly, 80, 84-96. Google Scholar | |
|
Koch, J.W. ( 2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations? Journal of Politics, 62, 414-429. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lawless, J.L. ( 2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly , 57, 479-490. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Leeper, M.S. ( 1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 248-261. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
McDermott, M.L. ( 1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 270-283. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. ( 2008). A paradox in public attitudes: Men or women: Who’s the better leader? Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/932/men-or-women-whos-the-better-leader Google Scholar | |
|
Riggle, E.D.B. , Miller, P.M. , Shields, T.G. , & Johnson, M.M.S. (1997). Gender stereotypes and decision context in the evaluation of political candidates. Women and Politics, 17, 69-88. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rosenwasser, S.M. , & Dean, N.G. ( 1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 77-85. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Rosenwasser, S.M. , & Seale, J. ( 1988). Attitudes toward a hypothetical male or female presidential candidate: A research note. Political Psychology, 9, 591-598. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sapiro, V. ( 1981-1982). If U.S. Senator Baker were a woman: An experimental study of candidate images. Political Psychology , 3, 61-83. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Seelye, K.Q. ( 1999, October 21). The Dole candidacy: The overview. The New York Times, p. A1. Google Scholar | |
|
Seltzer, R.A. , Newman, J. , & Leighton, M.V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar | |
|
Streb, M.J. , Burrell, B. , Frederick, B. , & Genovese, M.A. (2008). Social desirability effects and support for a female American president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(1), 76-89. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wadsworth, A.J. , Patterson, P. , Kaid, L.L. , Cullers, G. , Malcomb, D. , & Lamirand, L. ( 1987). "Masculine" vs. "feminine" strategies in political ads: Implications for female candidates. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 15(1/2), 77-94. Google Scholar | Crossref |
