Climate change denial (i.e., organized attempts to downplay, deny, or dismiss scientific consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior) has been a recurrently researched topic in the United States, but is far less studied in Europe, where it is currently gathering force. The truth is that, as in the United States, climate deniers are a tiny minority in Europe. Their numbers contrast starkly with the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree on the reality of man-made climate change and the urgent need for action. However, the voices of climate deniers in Europe are amplified by a handful of influence groups, mainly think tanks, which consistently conceal their sources of funding and final interests. This situation can be approached from a strategic communication perspective, specifically within the framework of the situational theory of publics. From this standpoint, the knowledge of different variables relating to publics in a given situation regarding a public issue (like climate change) can determine the communication strategies chosen by deniers to amplify climate change denial arguments and will introduce their main communication strategies and messages.

Aldoory, L. (2001). Making health communications meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 163-185.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Aldoory, L., Kim, J. N., Tindall, N. (2010). The influence of perceived shared risk in crisis communication: Elaborating the situational theory of publics. Public Relations Review, 36, 134-140.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Aldoory, L., Van Dyke, M. (2004, August). Shared involvement and risk perception in responding to bioterrorism: An extension of the situational theory of publics. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Google Scholar
Aldoory, L., Van Dyke, M. (2006). The role of perceived “shared” involvement and information overload in understanding how audiences make meaning of news about bioterrorism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 346-361.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Almiron, N. (2013). Alimentación y calentamiento global: «La larga sombra del ganado» en la prensa española [Food and Global Warming: “Livestock’s Long Shadow” in the Spanish Press]. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 19(1), 17-33.
Google Scholar
Almiron, N., Zoppeddu, M. (2015). Eating meat and climate change: The media blind spot—A study of Spanish and Italian press coverage. Environmental Communication, 9, 307-325.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Armitage, K. C. (2011). State of denial: The United States and the politics of global warming, Globalizations, 2, 417-427.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121-153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1946). Collective behavior. In Lee, A. M. (Ed.), New outlines of the principle of sociology (pp. 167-222). New York, NY: Barnes & Noble.
Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T., Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cameron, G. T., Yang, J. (1990, August). Refining Grunig’s situational theory: The addition of valence of support as a key variable. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, MN.
Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Chicago, IL: Swallow.
Google Scholar
Gibson, R., Zillman, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21, 603-624.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Grunig, J. E. (1976). Communication behaviors occurring in decision and non-decision situations. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 252-286.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Grunig, J. E. (1983). Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics: Two studies (Journalism Monographs, 81). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
Google Scholar
Grunig, J. E . (1989). Publics, audiences and market segments: Segmentation principles for campaigns. In Salmon, C. T. (Ed.), Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change (pp. 199-223). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Grunig, J. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges, and new research. In Moss, D., MacManus, T., Vercic, D. (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 3-48). London, England: International Thomson Business Press.
Google Scholar
Grunig, J. E., Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
Google Scholar
Grunig, J. E., Repper, F. C. (1992). Strategic management, publics, and issues. In Grunig, J. E. (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 117-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. K. (1992). Grunig’s situational theory: A replication, application, and extension. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 123-149.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hanson, F. (2010). The Lowy Institute Poll 2010. Australia and the world: Public opinion and foreign policy. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Google Scholar
Heras, F. (2010). Negacionistas, refractarios e inconsecuentes: sobre el difícil reto de reconocer el cambio climático [Deniers, refractory and inconsistent: The difficult challenge of recognizing climate change]. In González, J. A., Santos, I. (Eds.), Cuatro grandes retos: Una solución global (pp. 124-136). Madrid, Spain: Fundación IPADE.
Google Scholar
Jaques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental politics, 17, 349-385.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kim, J.-N., Grunig, J. (2007, May). Explicating and validating communicant activeness in problem solving (CAPS). Paper presented to International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. (2010). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in January 2010. Retrieved from http://e360.yale.edu/images/digest/AmericansGlobalWarmingBeliefs2010.pdf
Google Scholar
Major, A. M. (1993). Environmental concern and situational communication theory: Implications for communicating with environmental publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5, 251-268.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Meira, P. A. (2009). La sociedad ante el cambio climático. Conocimientos, valoraciones y comportamientos de la población española [Society and climate change. Skills, values and behaviors of the Spanish population]. Madrid, Spain: Fundación Mapfre.
Google Scholar
Míguez, M. I. (2006). Teoría situacional de los públicos: las nuevas aportaciones desde la década de los noventa [Situational theory of publics: New contributions since nineties decade]. Comunicación y Sociedad, 19, 133-162.
Google Scholar
Plehwe, D. (2014). Think tank networks and the knowledge–interest nexus: The case of climate change. Critical Policy Studies, 8, 101-115.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Roser, C., Thompson, M. (1995). Fear appeals and the formation of active publics. Journal of Communication, 45, 103-119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., Gutscher, H. (2001). Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters. Risk Analysis, 21, 1047-1053.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Slater, M. D., Chipman, H., Auld, G., Keefe, T., Kendall, P. (1992). Information processing and situational theory: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 189-203.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Spence, A., Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Demski, C. (2010). Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted in January-March 2010 (Understanding risk Working Paper 10-01). Cardiff, Wales, England: School of Psychology.
Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists . (2007). Smoke, mirrors & hot air: How ExxonMobil uses big tobacco’s tactics to “manufacture uncertainty” on climate change. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
Google Scholar
Zillman, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 19-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

ABS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $335.00

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top