![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article analyzes the process of organizing collective action by studying the role of the organizational platform provided by the United Nations–backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) initiative in supporting institutional investors’ collaborative engagement with corporations on environmental, social, and governance issues. The authors combine stakeholder and collective action theory to explain how institutional investors influence corporations through collective engagement. A unique access to data from the PRI secretariat on two cases of collaborative campaigns allows evaluation of our framework. The findings clarify how investors enhance their sources of power, legitimacy, and urgency and attract managers’ attention through collaborative engagement, and show how they manage these attributes to reshape the legitimacy and urgency of their claims in the eyes of managers. Our data suggest that “enabling organizations” such as the PRI initiative facilitate the emergence of collective action by lowering barriers to entry and providing a mobilizing structure, support collaborative efforts by adding their own legitimacy, normative power, and persistence to the collaborative engagement, and create conditions for a lasting dialogue between investors and managers by providing a hybrid organizational space.
References
|
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). What matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 507-525. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Alinsky, S. (1971). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar | |
|
Baron, R. (1995). Nonmarket strategies. California Management Review, 37(2), 47-65. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Boltanski, L., Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: The economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cassell, C., Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Clark, T., Hebb, G. L. (2004). Pension fund corporate engagement: The fifth stage of capitalism. Industrial Relations, 59, 142-171. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Collier, J. (2004). Responsible shareholding and investor engagement in the U.K. In Brenkert, G. G. (Ed.), Corporate integrity and accountability (pp. 238-252). London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Davis, G. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance reshaped America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Del Guercio, D., Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 293-340. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Den Hond, F., de Bakker, F. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901-924. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and democracy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 651-669. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case studies research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Eurosif . (2008). European SRI study. Paris, France: Eurosif Studies. Retrieved from www.eurosif.org Google Scholar | |
|
Eurosif . (2010). European SRI study. Paris, France: Eurosif Studies. Retrieved from http://www.eurosif.org Google Scholar | |
|
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2002). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fombrun, C., Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman. Google Scholar | |
|
Friedland, R., Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In Powell, W. W., DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Gallup International . (2003). Trust will be the challenge of 2003. Retrieved from http://www.voice-of-the-people.net/ContentFiles/docs/VoP_Trust_Survey.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Gifford, J. (2010a). Effective shareholder engagement: The factors that contribute to shareholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 79-97. Google Scholar | |
|
Gifford, J. (2010b). Financial markets and the Global Compact: The principles for responsible investment. In Rasche, A., Kell, G. (Eds.), The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, trends and challenges (pp. 195-214). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gillan, S. L., Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57, 375-305. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gillan, S. L., Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2), 4-22. Google Scholar | |
|
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorn, NJ: Aldine de Gruyter. Google Scholar | |
|
Green, S. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653-669. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Green, S. E., Nohria, N., Li, Y. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 11-36. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Guyatt, D. (2006). Identifying and overcoming behavioural impediments to long-term responsible investing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bath, UK. Google Scholar | |
|
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Habermas, J. (1998). Three normative models of democracy. In Habermas, J. (Ed.), The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theories (pp. 239-252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hardy, C. (Ed.). (1995). Power and politics in organizations. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth. Google Scholar | |
|
Hargrave, T., Van, de, Van, de, Ven, A. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 864-888 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jurvale, C., Lewis, A. (2009). Identifying impediments to SRI in Europe: A review of the practitioner and academic literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 285-310. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lucea, R. (2010). How we see them versus how they see themselves: A cognitive perspective of firm-NGO relationships. Business & Society, 49(1), 116-139. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mitnick, B. M. (2000). Commitment, revelation and the testament of belief: The metrics of measurement of CSP. Business & Society, 39, 419-465. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187-206. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Olson, M. (2000). Rational individuals and irrational societies. In Olson, M. (Ed.), Power and prosperity (pp. 69-88). New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions of collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1-22. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Palazzo, G., Scherer, A. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71-88. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Patriotta, G., Gond, J.-P., Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1804-1836. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Google Scholar | |
|
Principles for Responsible Investment . (2010). Collaborative engagements by PRI signatories. Retrieved from http://www.unpri.org/collaborations/ Google Scholar | |
|
Principles for Responsible Investment . (2011a). Strategy and work programme 2011-2013. Retrieved from http://www.unpri.org/files/2011_PRI_SWP.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Principles for Responsible Investment . (2011b). Collaborative engagements by PRI signatories. Retrieved from http://www.unpri.org/collaborations/ Google Scholar | |
|
Rasche, A. (2009). A “necessary supplement”: What the United Nations Global Compact is and is not. Business & Society, 48, 511-537. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243-263. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., Graves, S. B. (1997). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43, 239-267. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Rubach, M. J., Sebora, T. C. (2009). Determinants of institutional investor activism: A test of the Ryan-Schneider model (2002). Journal of Managerial Issues, 21, 245-261. Google Scholar | |
|
Ryan, L., Schneider, M. (2002). The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Academy of Management Review, 27, 554-573. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ryan, L., Schneider, M. (2003). Institutional investor power and heterogeneity: Implications for agency and stakeholder theories. Business & Society, 42, 398-429. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Scherer, A., Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096-1120. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Scherer, A., Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-931. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Smith, M., Voreacos, D. (2006, November 2). Slaves in Amazon forced to make materials used by GM (Update1). Bloomberg. (Retrieved June 6, 2011) Google Scholar | |
|
Solomon, J. (2007). Corporate governance and accountability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Sparkes, R., Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45-57. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Useem, M. (1996). Investor capitalism. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Van, de, Ven, A. H., Garud, R. (1993). Innovation and industry emergence: The case of cochlear implants. Research on technological innovation, management, and policy, 5, 1-46. Google Scholar | |
|
Vandekerckhove, W., Leys, J., Van Braekel, D. (2008). A speech-act model for talking to management: Building a framework for evaluating communication within the SRI engagement process. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 77-91. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Waddock, S. A. (2008a). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87-108. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Waddock, S. A. (2008b). The difference makers. How social and institutional entrepreneurs created the corporate social responsibility movement. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf. Google Scholar | |
|
Waddock, S. A. (2009). Making a difference? Corporate responsibility as a social movement. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 33, 35-46. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 26, 613-634. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Williamson, O. E. (1995). Hierarchies, markets and power in the economy: An economic perspective. Industrial and corporate change, 4(1), 21-49. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar |
