Academics are increasingly using the concept of populism to make sense of current events such as the Brexit referendum and the Trump presidency. This is certainly a welcome development, but two shortcomings can be observed in the contemporary debate. On one hand, new populism scholars often start from scratch and do not build upon the existing research. On the other hand, those who have been doing comparative research on populism stay in their comfort zone and thus do not try to link their work to other academic fields. In this article, we address these two shortcomings by discussing some of the advantages of the so-called ideational approach to the comparative study of populism and by pointing out four avenues of future research, which are closely related to some of the contributions of this special issue, namely, (a) economic anxiety, (b) cultural backlash, (c) the tension between responsiveness and responsibility, and (d) (negative) partisanship and polarization.

Abramowitz, A. I., Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12-22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 1324-1353.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Akkerman, A., Zaslove, A., Spruyt, B. (2017). “We the people” or “we the peoples?” A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 377-403.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Arzheimer, K. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 259-275.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Arzheimer, K. (2011). Electoral sociology—who votes for the extreme right and why—and when? In Backes, U., Moreau, P. (Eds.), The extreme right in Europe: Currents, trends and perspectives (pp. 35-50). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Aslanidis, P. (2016a). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64, 88-104.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Aslanidis, P. (2016b). Populist social movements of the Great Recession. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21, 301-321.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Aslanidis, P. (2017). Populism and social movements. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 306-325). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Aslanidis, P., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2016). Dealing with populists in government: The SYRIZA-ANEL coalition in Greece. Democratization, 23, 1077-1091.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Axelrod, R. (1967). The structure of public opinion on policy position. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 51-60.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Berman, S. (2017). The pipe dream of undemocratic liberalism. Journal of Democracy, 28(3), 29-38.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berning, C. C., Schlueter, E. (2016). The dynamics of radical right-wing populist party preferences and perceived group threat: A comparative panel analysis of three competing hypotheses in the Netherlands and Germany. Social Science Research, 55, 83-93.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bohman, A., Hjerm, M. (2016). In the wake of radical right electoral success: A cross-country comparative study of anti-immigration attitudes over time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 1729-1747.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bonikowski, B., Gidron, N. (2015). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952-1996. Social Forces, 94, 1593-1621.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bosch, A., Durán, I. M. (2017). How does economic crisis impel emerging parties on the road to elections? The case of the Spanish Podemos and Ciudadanos. Party Politics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1354068817710223
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46, 357-385.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bustikova, L. (2014). Revenge of the radical right. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 1738-1765.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Caruana, N. J., McGregor, R. M., Stephenson, L. B. (2014). The power of the dark side: Negative partisanship and political behaviour in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48, 771-789.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Courtois, G. (2017, March 7). Un tiers des Français se disent en accord avec les idées du Front national [One-third of French people agree with the ideas of the Front National]. En Savoir Plus Sur. Le Monde.
Google Scholar
Dornbusch, R., Edwards, S. (Eds.). (1991). The macroeconomics of populism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ejdemyr, S., Kramon, E., Robinson, A. E. (2017). Segregation, ethnic favoritism, and the strategic targeting of local public goods. Comparative Political Studies, 51, 1111-1143.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Errejón, I., Mouffe, C. (2015). Construir pueblo: hegemonía y radicalización de la democracia [Constructing the people: hegemony and radicalization of democracy]. Barcelona, Spain: Icaria Editorial.
Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. American Review of Political Science, 11, 563-588.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Foa, R. S., Mounk, Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28, 5-16.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ford, R., Goodwin, M. J. (2013). Revolt on the right: Explaining support for the radical right in Britain. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Gest, J., Reny, T., Mayer, J. (2018). Roots of the radical right: Nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 51, 1694-1719.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gimpel, J. C., Hui, I. S. (2015). Seeking politically compatible neighbors? The role of neighborhood partisan composition in residential sorting. Political Geography, 48, 130-142.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Golder, M. (2003). Electoral institutions, unemployment and extreme right parties: A correction. British Journal of Political Science, 33, 525-534.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gómez-Reino, M., Llamazares, I. (in press). Embracing populist discourse in party formation and electoral mobilization: The case of Podemos. In Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R., Littvay, L., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Theory, concept and method. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Goodhart, D. (2017). The road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. London, England: Hurst.
Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1040-1067.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hawkins, K. A., Riding, S., Mudde, C. (2012, January). Measuring populist attitudes (C&M Working Paper No. 55). Retrieved from http://www.concepts-methods.org/Files/WorkingPaper/PC_55_Hawkins_Riding_Mudde.pdf
Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). What the (ideational) study of populism can teach us, and what it can’t. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 526-542.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95, 619-631.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Homola, J., Tavits, M. (2018). Contact reduces immigration-related fears for leftist but not for rightist voters. Comparative Political 51, 1789-1820.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter-revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 3-34.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., Norris, P. (2016, August). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (HKS Working Paper No. 26). Boston, MA.
Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15, 443-454.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jackman, R. W., Volpert, K. (1996). Conditions favoring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 26, 501-521.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jagers, J., Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 319-35.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Katz, R. S., Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1, 5-28.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kinder, D. R., Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal, nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London, England: Verso.
Google Scholar
Levitsky, S., Roberts, K. (Eds.). (2011). The resurgence of the Latin American left. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1955). The radical right: A problem for American democracy. British Journal of Sociology, 6, 176-209.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M., Scheepers, P. (2002). Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 345-378.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mair, P. (2009) Representative versus responsible government. Cologne. MPIfG Working Paper 09/8, pp. 1-19.
Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing out of Western democracy. London, England: Verso.
Google Scholar
Manucci, L., Weber, E. (2017). Why the big picture matters: Political and media populism in Western Europe since the 1970s. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 313-334.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82, 280-301.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Medeiros, M., Noel, A. (2013). The forgotten side of partisanship: Negative party identification in four Anglo-American democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 1022-1046.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Meléndez, C., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Political identities: The missing link in the study of populism. Party Politics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1354068817741287
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, England: Verso.
Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004a). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 541-563.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mudde, C. (2004b). EU accession and a new populist center-periphery cleavage in Central and Eastern Europe (CES Central & Eastern Europe Working Paper No. 62). Cambridge, MA.
Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mudde, C. (2016). On extremism and democracy in Europe. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2018). The far right in America. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mudde, C., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48, 147-174.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mudde, C., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Correction or threat for democracy? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mudde, C., Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mueller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Norris, P. (2005). Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Oesch, D. (2008). Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review, 29, 349-373.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Orriols, L., Cordero, G. (2016). The breakdown of the Spanish two-party system: The upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 general election. South European Society and Politics, 21, 469-492.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A socio-cultural approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 73-97). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Panizza, F. (2009). Contemporary Latin America: Development and democracy beyond the Washington consensus. London, England: Zed Books.
Google Scholar
Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 444-461.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rooduijn, M. (2014). The mesmerising message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies, 62, 726-744.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rooduijn, M., Burgoon, B. (2018). The paradox of wellbeing: Do unfavourable socioeconomic and sociocultural contexts deepen or dampen radical left and right voting among the less well-off? Comparative Political Studies 51, 1720-1753.
Google Scholar | Abstract
Rooduijn, M., Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics, 34, 1272-1283.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rose, R., Mishler, W. (1998). Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries. Electoral Studies, 17, 217-234.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rovira Kaltwasser, C . (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19, 184-208.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rovira Kaltwasser, C . (2014). The responses of populism to Dahl’s democratic dilemmas. Political Studies, 62, 470-487.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Rovira Kaltwasser, C . (2017). Populism and the question of how to respond to it. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. A., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 489-507). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rydgren, J. (2007). The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 241-262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rydgren, J. (2008). Immigration skeptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 737-765.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Samuels, D. J., Zucco, C. (2018). Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans: Voting behavior in Brazil. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Singer, M. (2018). Delegating away democracy: How good representation and policy successes can undermine democratic legitimacy. Comparative Political Studies 51, 1754-1788.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Spier, T. (2010). Modernisierungsverlierer? Die Wählerschaft rechtspopulistischer Parteien in Westeuropa [Modernization losers? The electorate of right-wing populist parties in Western Europe]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). The return of “the people”: Populism and anti-populism in the shadow of the European crisis. Constellations, 21, 505-517.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stockemer, D. (2015). Structural data on immigration or immigration perceptions? What accounts for the electoral success of the radical right in Europe? Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 999-1016.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stravakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G. (2015). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19, 119-142.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London, England: Verso.
Google Scholar
Swank, D., Betz, H.-G. (2003). Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 215-245.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Van Hauwaert, S., Van Kessel, S. (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 68-92.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Weyland, K. (2017). Populism: A political-strategic approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. A., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 48-72). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Weyland, K., Madrid, R., Hunter, W. (Eds.). (2010). Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcomings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

CPS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $195.42

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top