Intended for healthcare professionals
Menus
SAGE Journals
Profilelogged-in
View Cart
Cart
2.135
Impact Factor
5-Year Impact Factor 2.381
Journal Indexing & Metrics »
Article Menu
Download PDF [PDF]

Did you struggle to get access to this article? This product could help you

Accessing resources off campus can be a challenge. Lean Library can solve it

  • Full Article

     Content List
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • EU actorness and effectiveness in international negotiations
    • The European Union in the Codex Alimentarius
    • The EU negotiating growth promoters
    • Conclusion
    • Notes

  • Figures & Tables

  • Article Metrics

  • Related Articles

  • Comments

Cite

Citation Tools

How to cite this article

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

How to cite this article
Style
Copy to clipboard
Format
Tips on citation download
Download Citation

Download article citation data for:
The EU’s growing pains in negotiating international food standards
Louise van Schaik
International Relations 2013 27:3, 292-307

Download Citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

Format
Tips on citation download
Download Citation

Download article citation data for:
The EU’s growing pains in negotiating international food standards
Louise van Schaik
International Relations 2013 27:3, 292-307

Share

Share

Share this article via social media.

The e-mail addresses that you supply to use this service will not be used for any other purpose without your consent.

Recommend to a friend

Email a link to the following content:


















CAPTCHA


The e-mail addresses that you supply to use this service will not be used for any other purpose without your consent.

Sharing links are not available for this article.

For more information view the SAGE Journals Article Sharing page.

Create a link to share a read only version of this article with your colleagues and friends. For more information view the SAGE Journals Sharing page.

Please read and accept the terms and conditions and check the box to generate a sharing link.

Request Permissions

View permissions information for this article

Explore More

The EU’s growing pains in negotiating international food standards

Show all authors
Louise van Schaik
Louise van Schaik
Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’
See all articles by this author
First Published September 3, 2013 Research Article
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117813497303
Article information  Open epub for The EU’s growing pains in negotiating international food standards
Article Information PDF download for The EU’s growing pains in negotiating international food standards Open epub for The EU’s growing pains in negotiating international food standards
No Access

Article Information

Volume: 27 issue: 3, page(s): 292-307
Article first published online: September 3, 2013; Issue published: September 1, 2013
Louise van Schaik
Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’

Corresponding Author:

Louise van Schaik, Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, PO Box 93080, 2509 AB The Hague, the Netherlands. Email:

Authors

Louise van Schaik
Louise van Schaik
Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’
See all articles by this author
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117813497303
First Published Online: September 3, 2013

Abstract

This article relates the effectiveness of the European Union’s (EU) effectiveness to its international actorness in negotiations on international food standards taking place in the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). Actorness is taken to result from EU competence, preference homogeneity and processes of socialisation among EU Member State representatives. In the 2009 negotiations on growth promoters for livestock, whose use the EU opposes, the Commission took the lead. It was trusted and supported by the EU Member States, but its dominant role resulted in them being rather passive. As a result, the EU’s potential to negotiate effectively in the CAC was not used in its full potential.

Keywords

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.
    Sign Out
    Need to activate?
    Need Help?

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Click here to view / 点击获取全文
    Need Help?

    Institutional Login

    Loading institutional login options...

    Need Help?

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Recommend to your library
    Need Help?
    Rent with DeepDyve
    Rent Article

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

    Purchase Save for later

Purchase

IRE-article-ppv for GBP29.00
IRE-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP311.86
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $373.66

Article available in:

Related Articles

Similar Articles:
Similar Articles:
View all >
The EU as an effective trade power? Strategic choice of judicial candidates in the context of t... No Access
Show details
The European Union at the Copenhagen climate negotiations: A case of contested EU actorness and... No Access
Show details
The European Union as a Leader in International Multilateral Negotiations — a Problemati... No Access
Show details
Articles Citing this One: 2