What Is the Epistemic Function of Highly Idealized Agent-Based Models of Scientific Inquiry?

First Published April 16, 2018 Research Article

Authors

1
 
Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
by this author
, 2
 
Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
by this author
First Published Online: April 16, 2018

In this paper we examine the epistemic value of highly idealized agent-based models (ABMs) of social aspects of scientific inquiry. On the one hand, we argue that taking the results of such simulations as informative of actual scientific inquiry is unwarranted, at least for the class of models proposed in recent literature. Moreover, we argue that a weaker approach, which takes these models as providing only “how-possibly” explanations, does not help to improve their epistemic value. On the other hand, we suggest that if ABMs of science underwent two types of robustness analysis, they could indeed have a clear epistemic function, namely by providing evidence for philosophical and historical hypotheses. In this sense, ABMs can obtain evidential and explanatory properties and thus be a useful tool for integrated history and philosophy of science. We illustrate our point with an example of a model—building on the work by Kevin Zollman—which we apply to a concrete historical case study.

Alexander, Jason McKenzie, Johannes, Himmelreich, Christopher, Thompson. 2015. “Epistemic Landscapes, Optimal Search, and the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Philosophy of Science 82 (3): 424-53.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bala, Venkatesh, Goyal, Sanjeev. 1998. “Learning from Neighbours.” The Review of Economic Studies 65 (3): 595-621.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bokulich, Alisa . 2014. “How the Tiger Bush Got Its Stripes: ‘How Possibly’ vs. ‘How Actually’ Model Explanations.” The Monist 97 (3): 321-38.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Borg, AnneMarie, Frey, Daniel, Šešelja, Dunja, Straßer, Christian. 2017a. “An Argumentative Agent-Based Model of Scientific Inquiry.” In Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice: 30th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2017, Arras, France, June 27-30, 2017, Proceedings, Part I, edited by Benferhat, Salem, Tabia, Karim, Ali, Moonis, 507-10. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Borg, AnneMarie, Frey, Daniel, Šešelja, Dunja, Straßer, Christian. 2017b. “Examining Network Effects in an Argumentative Agent-Based Model of Scientific Inquiry.” In Logic, Rationality, and Interaction: 6th International Workshop, LORI 2017, Sapporo, Japan, September 11-14, 2017, Proceedings, edited by Baltag, Alexandru, Seligman, Jeremy, Yamada, Tomoyuki, 391-406. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_27.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Borg, AnneMarie, Frey, Daniel, Dunja, Šešelja, Straßer, Christian. 2018. “Epistemic Effects of Scientific Interaction: Approaching the Question with an Argumentative Agent-Based Model.” Historical Social Research 43 (1): 285-309.
Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok . 2012. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Pluralism and Realism. Netherland: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chang, Hasok . 2015. “The Chemical Revolution Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:91-98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
De Langhe, Rogier . 2013. “Peer Disagreement under Multiple Epistemic Systems.” Synthese 190:2547-56.
Google Scholar | Crossref
De Langhe, Rogier . 2014. “A Unified Model of the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Philosophy of Science 81 (3): 444-59.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Douven, Igor . 2009. “Uniqueness Revisited.” American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4): 347-61.
Google Scholar
Douven, Igor . 2010. “Simulating Peer Disagreements.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2): 148-57.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dray, William H. 1957. Laws and Explanation in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Forber, Patrick . 2010. “Confirmation and Explaining How Possible.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (1): 32-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Forber, Patrick . 2012. “Conjecture and Explanation: A Reply to Reydon.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 298-301.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Frey, Daniel, Šešelja, Dunja. Forthcoming. “Robustness and Idealization in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Google Scholar
Gelfert, Axel . 2016. How to Do Science with Models: A Philosophical Primer. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Goldman, Alvin, Blanchard, Thomas. 2016. “Social Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N. Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/epistemology-social/.
Google Scholar
Grim, Patrick . 2009. “Threshold Phenomena in Epistemic Networks.” In AAAI Fall Symposium: Complex Adaptive Systems and the Threshold Effect, 53-60. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FSS/FSS09/paper/view/916/1234
Google Scholar
Grim, Patrick, Singer, Daniel J., Fisher, Steven, Bramson, Aaron, Berger, William J., Reade, Christopher, Flocken, Carissa, Sales, Adam. 2013. “Scientific Networks on Data Landscapes: Question Difficulty, Epistemic Success, and Convergence.” Episteme 10 (4): 441-64.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Grüne-Yanoff, Till . 2009. “Learning from Minimal Economic Models.” Erkenntnis 70 (1): 81-99.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hosking, S. W., Chung, S. C. S., Yung, M. Y., Li, A. K. C., Sung, J. J. Y., Ling, T. K. W., Cheng, A. F. B. 1994. “Duodenal Ulcer Healing by Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori without Anti-Acid Treatment: Randomised Controlled Trial.” The Lancet 343 (8896): 508-10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91460-5.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., Waters, C. Kenneth, eds. 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Kelp, Christoph, Douven, Igor. 2012. “Sustaining a Rational Disagreement.” In EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009, edited by Henk W., de Regt, Hartmann, Stephan, Okasha, Samir, 101-10. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kinzel, Katherina . 2015. “Narrative and Evidence. How Can Case Studies from the History of Science Support Claims in the Philosophy of Science?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:48-57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Kummerfeld, Erich, Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2016. “Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 1057-76.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kuorikoski, Jaakko, Lehtinen, Aki. 2009. “Incredible Worlds, Credible Results.” Erkenntnis 70 (1): 119-31.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lehtinen, Aki . 2017. “Derivational Robustness and Indirect Confirmation.” Erkenntnis 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9902-6
Google Scholar
Lehtinen, Aki, Kuorikoski, Jaakko. 2007. “Unrealistic Assumptions in Rational Choice Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2): 115-38.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Mäki, Uskali . 2009. “Realistic Realism about Unrealistic Models.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, edited by Kincaid, Harold, Ross, Don, 68-98. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Martini, Carlo, Pinto, Manuela Fernández. 2017. “Modeling the Social Organization of Science.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):221-38.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Moayyedi, Paul, Soo, Shelly, Deeks, Jonathan, Forman, David, Mason, James, Innes, Michael, Delaney, Brendan. 2000. “Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation of Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Treatment for Non-Ulcer Dyspepsia.” British Medical Journal 321 (7262): 659-64. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.659.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Pfleiderer, Paul . 2014. “Chameleons: The Misuse of Theoretical Models in Finance and Economics.” Revista de Economía Institucional 16 (31): 23-60.
Google Scholar
Pitt, Joseph C. 2001. “The Dilemma of Case Studies: Toward a Heraclitian Philosophy of Science.” Perspectives on Science 9 (4): 373-82.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Pöyhönen, Samuli . 2017. “Value of Cognitive Diversity in Science.” Synthese 194 (11): 4519-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Reutlinger, Alexander, Hangleiter, Dominik, Hartmann, Stephan. 2016. “Understanding (with) Toy Models.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx005
Google Scholar
Reydon, Thomas A. C. 2012. “How-Possibly Explanations as Genuine Explanations and Helpful Heuristics: A Comment on Forber.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 302-10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Rosenstock, Sarita, O’Connor, Cailin, Bruner, Justin. 2017. “In Epistemic Networks, Is Less Really More?” Philosophy of Science 84 (2): 234-52.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Šešelja, Dunja, Straßer, Christian. 2014. “Heuristic Reevaluation of the Bacterial Hypothesis of Peptic Ulcer Disease in the 1950s.” Acta Biotheoretica 62:429-54.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Soler, Léna, Trizio, Emiliano, Nickles, Thomas, Wimsatt, William. 2012. Characterizing the Robustness of Science: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science. Vol. 292. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Strevens, Michael . 2010. “Reconsidering Authority: Scientific Expertise, Bounded Rationality, and Epistemic Backtracking.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, edited by Gendler, Tamar Szabo, Hawthorne, John, vol. 3, 294-330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Thiele, Jan C., Winfried, Kurth, Volker, Grimm. 2014. “Facilitating Parameter Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Agent-Based Models: A Cookbook Using Netlogo and R.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 17 (3): 11. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/17/3/11.html>.10.18564/jasss.2503
Google Scholar
Thoma, Johanna . 2015. “The Epistemic Division of Labor Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 82 (3): 454-72.
Google Scholar | Crossref
van Riel, Raphael . 2015. “The Content of Model-Based Information.” Synthese 192 (12): 3839-58.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Weisberg, Michael, Muldoon, Ryan. 2009. “Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Philosophy of Science 76 (2): 225-52.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wilensky, Uri . 1999. “NetLogo.” Center for Connected Learning and Computer Based Modeling, Northwestern University. https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
Google Scholar
Wray, K. Brad . 2011. Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ylikoski, Petri, Aydinonat, N. Emrah. 2014. “Understanding with Theoretical Models.” Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (1): 19-36.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2007. “The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy of Science 74 (5): 574-87.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.” Erkenntnis 72 (1): 17-35.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2013. “Network Epistemology: Communication in Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy Compass 8 (1): 15-27.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

POS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
POS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP171.19
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $205.11

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top