![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Social stratification may be one of the most difficult topics covered in sociology classes. This article describes an interactive learning exercise, using a modified version of the game Monopoly, intended to stress the structural nature of social inequality and to stimulate student reflection and class discussion on social stratification in the United States. The primary focus of this exercise is to help students experience different levels of social stratification and to challenge the idea that individual talents or aspirations are enough to overcome structural barriers to upward class mobility. Student reactions to the experience suggest that it is an effective tool for demonstrating the structural nature of social inequality in the United States and for stimulating discussion on social inequality and related topics. This exercise has worked well in introductory sociology, social problems, and social inequality classes.
References
|
Bellis, Mary 2003. “Monopoly, Monopoly: The History of the Monopoly Board Game.” Retrieved January 26, 2003 (http:inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa121997.htm). Google Scholar | |
|
Bohmer, Susanne, Briggs, Joyce L. 1991. “Teaching Privileged Students About Gender, Race, and Class Oppression.” Teaching Sociology 19: 154–63. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Brezina, Timothy 1996. “Teaching Inequality: A Simple Counterfactual Exercise.” Teaching Sociology 24: 218–24. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Davern, Michael E., Fisher, Patricia J. 2001. Household Net Worth and Asset Ownership: 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved May 12, 2003 (http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p70-71.pdf). Google Scholar | |
|
Davis, Nancy J. 1992. “Teaching About Inequality: Student Resistance, Paralysis, and Rage.” Teaching Sociology 20: 232–8. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dorn, Dean S. 1989. “Simulation Games: One More Tool on the Pedagogical Shelf.” Teaching Sociology 17: 1–18. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eells, Laura W. 1987. “So Inequality Is Fair? Demonstrating Structured Inequality in the Classroom.” Teaching Sociology 15: 73–5. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Giuffre, Katherine, Paxton, Pamela 1997. “Building Social Networks.” Teaching Sociology 25: 207–13. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Groves, Julian M., Warren, Charles, Witschger, Jerome 1996. “Reversal of Fortune: A Simulation Game For Teaching Inequality in the Classroom.” Teaching Sociology 24: 364–71. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hilligoss, Tonya 1992. “Demystifying ‘Classroom Chemistry’: The Role of the Interactive Learning Model.” Teaching Sociology 20: 12–7. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Huggins, Denise W., Coghlan, Catherine L. 2003. “Social Stratification and Life Chances: An Interactive Learning Strategy for Criminal Justice Classes.” Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar | |
|
Jessup, Michael M. 2001. “Sociopoly: Life on the Boardwalk.” Teaching Sociology 29: 102–9. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McCammon, Lucy 1999. “Introducing Social Stratification and Inequality: An Active Learning Technique.” Teaching Sociology 27: 44–54. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McGrane, Bernard 1993. “Zen Sociology: Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!” Teaching Sociology 21: 79–84. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sernau, Scott 1995. “Using a Collaborative Problem-Solving Approach in Teaching Social Stratification.” Teaching Sociology 23: 364–73. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wright, Erik O. 2001. “A General Framework for the Analysis of Class.” Pp. 99–113 in Great Divides: Readings in Social Inequality in the United States, 2d ed., edited by Shapiro, Thomas M. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield. Google Scholar | |
|
Wright, Mary 2000. “Getting More Out of Less: The Benefits of Short-Term Experiential Learning in Undergraduate Sociology Courses.” Teaching Sociology 28: 116–26. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
