Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published August 1994

The Effects of Television Violence on Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis1

Abstract

A meta-analysis is performed on studies pertaining to the effect of television violence on aggressive behavior. Partitioning by research design, viewer attributes, treatment and exposure variables, and type of antisocial behavior, allows one to interpret computed effect sizes for each of the variables in the partitions. We find a positive and significant correlation between television violence and aggressive behavior, albeit to varying degrees depending on the particular research question. According to research design, we find ZFisher values ranging from .19 for survey to .40 for laboratory experiments. Erotica emerges as a strong factor even when it is not accompanied by portrayal of violence. Additionally, the effect of television violence on the antisocial behavior of boys and girls is found to be marginally equal in surveys. A host of tests are performed to solidify these, and further results. Substantive interpretation is provided as well.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1.
1. This research was partially supported by a grant from the National Research Council's Panel on the Understanding and Control of Violent Behavior.
One of us (H.P.) would like to thank Leeva Chung, Carole Hannon, Boonchi Hongaru, and John Tedesco for valuable assistance.
A list of references to the 217 studies that were coded for the meta-analysis performed in this article is available upon request; for copies write to Haejung Paik, Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, 610 Elm Ave., Room 101, Norman, Oklahoma 73019-0335.
2.
2. There is no justification for weighting by sample size (N), because the quality of the smaller N studies is often higher.
3.
3. We thank S. H. Chaffee for pointing out this problem to us.
4.
4. We express gratitude to one of the anonymous referees of this article for pointing out the “reassuring social significance” of this finding: He or she notes that one never crosses the street upon the approach of a mean-looking preschooler coming one's way.

References

Andison, F. S. (1977). TV violence and viewer aggression: A cumulation of study results. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 314-331.
Baker, R. K., & Ball, S. J. (1969). Violence and the media. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1971). [Review of Television and aggression]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35, 501-504.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3-11.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Review of developments in meta-analytic method. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 338-399.
Belson, W. A. (1978). Television violence and the adolescent boy. Westmead, England: Saxon House, Teakfield Limited.
Berkowitz, L., & Rawlings, E. (1963). Effects of film violence on inhibitions against subsequent aggression. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 405-412.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Comstock, G. (1974). [Review of Television and antisocial behavior: Field experiments]. Journal of Communication, 24(3), 155-158.
Comstock, G. (1983). Media influences on aggression. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Prevention and control of aggression (pp. 241-272). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Comstock, G., & Paik, H. (1987). Television and children: A review of recent research. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearing House on Information Resources.
Comstock, G., & Paik, H. (1991). Television and the American child. New York: Academic Press.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Houghton Mifflin.
Cook, T. D., Kendzierski, D. A., & Thomas, S. A. (1983). The implicit assumptions of television research: An analysis of the 1982 NIMH report on Television and Behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 161-201.
Cooper, H. M. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131-135.
Cooper, H. M. (1984). The integrative research review: A social science approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Donnerstein, E., Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1987). The question of pornography: Research findings and policy implications. New York: Free Press.
Feshbach, S., & Singer, R. D. (1971). Television and aggression: An experimental field study. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Freedman, D., Pisani, R., & Purves, R. (1978). Statistics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Freedman, J. L. (1984). Effect of television violence on aggressiveness. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 227-246.
Freedman, J. L. (1986). Television violence and aggression: A Rejoinder. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 372-378.
Freedman, J. L. (1988). Television violence and aggression: What the evidence shows. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual: Television as a social issue (Vol. 8, pp. 144-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Friedrich-Cofer, L., & Huston, A. C. (1986). Television violence and aggression: The debate continues. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 364-371.
Geen, R. G. (1994). Television and aggression: Recent developments in research and theory. In D. Zillmann, J. Bryant, & A. C. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family (pp. 151-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Glass, G., McGraw, B., & Smith, M. L., (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hearold, S. (1986). A synthesis of 1,043 effects of television on social behavior. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior: Vol. 1 (pp. 66-135). New York: Academic Press.
Hearold, S. L. (1979). Meta-analysis of the effects of television on social behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1983). Clustering estimates of effect magnitude from independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 563-573.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Klein, R., Brice, P., & Fischer, P. (1983). Mitigating the imitation of aggressive behaviors by changing children's attitudes about media violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 899-910.
Lefkowitz, M. M., Eron, L. D., Walder, L. O., & Huesmann, L. R. (1972). Television violence and child aggression: A followup study. In G. A. Comstock & E. A. Rubinstein (Eds.), Television and social behavior: Vol. 3. Television and adolescent aggressiveness (pp. 35-135). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Lefkowitz, M. M., Eron, L. D., Walder, L. O., & Huesmann, L. R. (1977). Growing up to be violent: A longitudinal study of the development of aggression. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Leyens, J. P., Camino, L., Parke, R. D., & Berkowitz, L. (1975). Effects of movie violence on aggression in a field setting as a function of group dominance and cohesion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 346-360.
Liebert, R. M., Sobol, M. P., & Davidson, E. S. (1972). Catharsis of aggression among institutionalized boys: Fact or artifact. In G. A. Comstock, E. A. Rubinstein, & J. P. Murray (Eds.), Television and social behavior: Vol. 5. Television's effects: Further explorations (pp. 351-358). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Light, R. J., & Smith, P. V. (1971). Accumulating evidence: Procedure for resolving contradictions among different research studies. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 429-471.
McGuire, W. J. (1986). The myth of massive media impact: Savagings and salvagings. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior: Vol. 1 (pp. 173-257). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McIntyre, J. J., & Teevan, J. J., Jr. (1972). Television violence and deviant behavior. In G. A. Comstock & E. A. Rubinstein (Eds.), Television and social behavior: Vol. 3. Television and adolescent aggressiveness (pp. 383-435). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
McLeod, J. M., Atkin, C. K., & Chaffee, S. H. (1972). Adolescents, parents, and television use: Self-report and other-report measures from the Wisconsin sample. In G. A. Comstock & E. A. Rubinstein (Eds.), Television and social behavior: Vol. 3. Television and adolescent aggressiveness (pp. 239-313). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Milavsky, J. R., Kessler, R., Stipp, H. H., & Rubens, W. S. (1982). Television and aggression: A panel study. New York: Academic Press.
Milgram, S., & Shotland, R. L. (1973). Television and antisocial behavior: A field experiment. New York: Academic Press.
Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced basic meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-346.
National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. (1969). To establish justice, to ensure domestic tranquility. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Paik, H. (1992, August). Gender and the effects of television violence: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal, Canada.
Pearl, D., Bouthilet, L., & Lazar, J. (Eds.). (1982). Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vols. 1-2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Phillips, D. P. (1986). The found experiment: A new technique for assessing the impact of mass media violence on real-world aggressive behavior. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 259-307). New York: Academic Press.
Roberts, D. F., & Maccoby, N. (1985). Effects of mass communication. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Special fields and applications (3rd ed., pp. 539-598). New York: Random House.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rosenthal, R. (1986). Media violence, antisocial behavior, and the social consequences of small effects. Journal of Social Issues, 42(3), 141-154.
Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Behavior. (1972). Television and growing up: The impact of televised violence (Report to the Surgeon General, United States Public Health Service). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Thornton, W., & Voight, L. (1984). Television and delinquency. Youth and Society, 15(4), 445-468.
Walker, H. M., & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Weaver, J. (1991). Responding to erotica: Perceptual processes and dispositional implications. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen (pp. 329-354). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wood, W., Wong, F., & Chachere, J. (1991). Effects of media violence on viewers' aggression in unconstrained social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 371-383.
Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1989). Pornography and men's sexual callousness toward women. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 95-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: August 1994
Issue published: August 1994

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Communication Research.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3291

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 481 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 515

  1. The importance of the null hypothesis in the formulation of theory in media psychology
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Handbook of Media Psychology
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths’ interactions with electronic screens
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dijital Çağda Ebeveyn Olmak: Çocuk İzleyiciler ve Ekrandaki Şiddet Üzerine Bir AraştırmaParenting in the Digital Age: A Research On Child Audience and Violence on the Screen
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Handbook of Anger, Aggression, and Violence
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Handbook of Anger, Aggression, and Violence
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Toddlers and the Telly: A latent profile analysis of children’s television time and content and behavioral outcomes one year later in the U.S.
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. From virtual to prosocial reality: The effects of prosocial virtual reality games on preschool Children's prosocial tendencies in real life environments
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Encyclopedia of Mental Health
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Encyclopedia of Mental Health
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB