Abstract
Computer-mediated communication (CMC) is sometimes heralded for its power to break down social boundaries and to liberate individuals from social influence, group pressure, and status and power differentials that characterize much face-to-face interaction. We review research conducted within the framework of the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE) demonstrating that this is not always the case. When communicators share a common social identity, they appear to be more susceptible to group influence, social attraction, stereotyping, gender typing, and discrimination in anonymous CMC. Although CMC gives us the opportunity to traverse social boundaries, paradoxically, it can also afford these boundaries greater power, especially when they define self- and group identity.
|
Balka, E.
(1993). Women and media in Canada: A feminist sampler. Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronique de Communication [On-line], 3. Available at http://www.cios.org/www.ejc/v3n193.htm. Google Scholar | |
|
Bargh, J. A.
, Chen, M. , & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Brouwer, J.
, Kawakami, J. , Rojahn, K. , & Postmes, T. (1997). De effecten van de (on)zichtbaarheid van sekse op zelf-stereotypering [The effects of gender (in)visibility on self-stereotyping]. In C.K.W. De Dreu , N. K. de Vries , D. Van Knippenberg , & C. Rutte (Eds.), Fundamentele sociale psychologie (Vol. 11, pp. 150-157). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Colman, A. M.
(1991). Crowd psychology in South African murder trials. American Psychologist, 46, 1071-1079. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Deutsch, M.
, & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. Google Scholar | |
|
Diener, E.
(1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Dijksterhuis, A.
, Spears, R. , Postmes, T. , Stapel, D. A. , Koomen, W. , van Knippenberg, A. , & Scheepers, D. (in press). Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Dubrovsky, V. J.
, Kiesler, S. , & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Festinger, L.
, Pepitone, A. , & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Franzoi, S. L.
(1996). Social psychology. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark. Google Scholar | |
|
Fulk, J.
, & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science, 6, 337-349. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Haraway, D.
(1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism / Postmodernism (pp. 190-233). London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Hayne, S.
, & Rice, R. (1997). Social cues and anonymous group interaction using group support systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 429-450. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Herring, S. C.
(1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication / Revuew Electronique de Communication. [On-line], 3. Available: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n293.htm. Google Scholar | |
|
Hiltz, S. R.
, & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hiltz, S. R.
, & Turoff, M. (1993). Preface to the revised edition. In S. R. Hiltz & M. Turoff (Eds.), The network nation (pp. xxix-xxxi). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hiltz, S. R.
, Turoff, M. , & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group processes in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hodges, A.
(1983). Alan Turing: The enigma. London: Vintage. Google Scholar | |
|
Hogg, M. A.
(1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar | |
|
Janis, I. L.
(1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar | |
|
Jessup, L. M.
, Connolly, T. , & Tansik, D. A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21, 333-348. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Johnson, R. D.
, & Downing, L. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1532-1538. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J. , & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kiesler, S.
, & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology [Special issue: Group decision making]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lea, M.
, & Giordano, R. (1997). Representations of the group and group processes in CSCW research: A case of premature closure? In G. Bowker , S. L. Star , W. Turner , & L. Gasser (Eds.), Social science, technical systems and cooperative work (pp. 5-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Lea, M.
, O'Shea, T. , Fung, P. , & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication: observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar | |
|
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making [Special issue: Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware]. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 34, 283-301. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-342. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (1998). Knowing me, knowing you: Effects of visual anonymity on stereotyping and attraction in computer-mediated groups. Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar | |
|
Le Bon, G.
(1995). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1895) Google Scholar | |
|
Lord, C. G.
(1997). Social psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. Google Scholar | |
|
Mantovani, G.
(1994). Is computer-mediated communication intrinsically apt to enhance democracy in organizations? Human Relations, 47, 45-62. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Matheson, K.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221-233. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Moreland, R. L.
, & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Myers, D.
(1987). “Anonymity is part of the magic”: Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 251-266. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nunamaker, J. F.
, Dennis, A. R. , Valacich, J. S. , & Vogel, D. R. (1991). Information technology for negotiating groups: Generating options for mutual gain. Management Science, 37, 1325-1346. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Poster, M.
(1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: Polity. Google Scholar | |
| Postmes, T. (1997). Social influence in computer-mediated groups. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam. Google Scholar | |
|
Postmes, T.
, & Spears, R. (1997, March). Quality of decisions, group norms and social identity: Biased sampling or sampled biases. Paper presented at the Fifth Munster Workshop on the Social Identity Approach, Rothenberge, Germany. Google Scholar | |
|
Postmes, T.
, & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Postmes, T.
, Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (in press). Social identity, group norms, and “deindividuation”: Lessons from computer-mediated communication for social influence in the group. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears , & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
| Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot, D. (1998). Social influence in computer-mediated groups: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar | |
|
Reicher, S.
(1982). The determination of collective behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 41-83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Reicher, S.
(1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner (Ed.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Reicher, S.
(1996). “The crowd” century: Reconciling practical success with theoretical failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 535-553. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Reicher, S.
, & Levine, M. (1994). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-164. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Reicher, S.
, Spears, R. , & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161-198). Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Rice, R. E.
, & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Rojahn, K. (1996). Gender in the context of leadership. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam. Google Scholar | |
|
Sabini, J.
(1995). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Norton. Google Scholar | |
|
Short, J. A.
, Williams, E. , & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Spears, R.
(1995). Isolating the collective self. In A. Oosterwegel & R. A. Wicklund (Eds.), The self in European and North American culture: Developments and processes (pp. 309-322). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar | |
|
Spears, R.
, & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar | |
|
Spears, R.
, & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Spears, R.
, Lea, M. , & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Srull, T. K.
, & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Stasser, G.
, & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Straus, S. G.
(1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tajfel, H.
(1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-60). London: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Tarde, G.
(1921). Les lois de l'imitation [The laws of imitation]. Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan. (Original work published 1890) Google Scholar | |
|
Turing, A. M.
(1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2, 230-265. Google Scholar | |
|
Turkle, S.
(1996). Parallel lives: Working on identity in virtual space. In D. Grodin & T. R. Lindlof (Eds.), Constructing the self in a mediated world (pp. 156-175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Turner, J. C.
(1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Turner, J. C.
(1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Turner, J. C.
(1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner , M. A. Hogg , P. J. Oakes , S. D. Reicher , & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Turner, J. C.
(1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Valacich, J. S.
, Jessup, L. M. , Dennis, A. R. , & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 219-241. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Waldzus, S., Schubert, T., & Frindte, W. (1997). Ingroup-favouritism and ingroup-salience under computer mediated conditions: An extended replication of minimal group results. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar | |
|
Walther, J. B.
(1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186-203. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Walther, J. B.
(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 1-43. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Walther, J.
, Anderson, J. F. , & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Zimbardo, P. G.
(1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar |

