Computer-mediated communication (CMC) is sometimes heralded for its power to break down social boundaries and to liberate individuals from social influence, group pressure, and status and power differentials that characterize much face-to-face interaction. We review research conducted within the framework of the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE) demonstrating that this is not always the case. When communicators share a common social identity, they appear to be more susceptible to group influence, social attraction, stereotyping, gender typing, and discrimination in anonymous CMC. Although CMC gives us the opportunity to traverse social boundaries, paradoxically, it can also afford these boundaries greater power, especially when they define self- and group identity.

Balka, E. (1993). Women and media in Canada: A feminist sampler. Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronique de Communication [On-line], 3. Available at http://www.cios.org/www.ejc/v3n193.htm.
Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. , Chen, M. , & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Brouwer, J. , Kawakami, J. , Rojahn, K. , & Postmes, T. (1997). De effecten van de (on)zichtbaarheid van sekse op zelf-stereotypering [The effects of gender (in)visibility on self-stereotyping]. In C.K.W. De Dreu , N. K. de Vries , D. Van Knippenberg , & C. Rutte (Eds.), Fundamentele sociale psychologie (Vol. 11, pp. 150-157). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. (1991). Crowd psychology in South African murder trials. American Psychologist, 46, 1071-1079.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
Google Scholar
Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A. , Spears, R. , Postmes, T. , Stapel, D. A. , Koomen, W. , van Knippenberg, A. , & Scheepers, D. (in press). Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Google Scholar | ISI
Dubrovsky, V. J. , Kiesler, S. , & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Festinger, L. , Pepitone, A. , & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Franzoi, S. L. (1996). Social psychology. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
Google Scholar
Fulk, J. , & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science, 6, 337-349.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism / Postmodernism (pp. 190-233). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Hayne, S. , & Rice, R. (1997). Social cues and anonymous group interaction using group support systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 429-450.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication / Revuew Electronique de Communication. [On-line], 3. Available: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n293.htm.
Google Scholar
Hiltz, S. R. , & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Hiltz, S. R. , & Turoff, M. (1993). Preface to the revised edition. In S. R. Hiltz & M. Turoff (Eds.), The network nation (pp. xxix-xxxi). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Hiltz, S. R. , Turoff, M. , & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group processes in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hodges, A. (1983). Alan Turing: The enigma. London: Vintage.
Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Jessup, L. M. , Connolly, T. , & Tansik, D. A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21, 333-348.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Johnson, R. D. , & Downing, L. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1532-1538.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kiesler, S. , Siegel, J. , & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kiesler, S. , & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology [Special issue: Group decision making]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lea, M. , & Giordano, R. (1997). Representations of the group and group processes in CSCW research: A case of premature closure? In G. Bowker , S. L. Star , W. Turner , & L. Gasser (Eds.), Social science, technical systems and cooperative work (pp. 5-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Lea, M. , O'Shea, T. , Fung, P. , & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication: observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar
Lea, M. , & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making [Special issue: Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware]. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lea, M. , & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-342.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lea, M. , & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (1998). Knowing me, knowing you: Effects of visual anonymity on stereotyping and attraction in computer-mediated groups. Manuscript in preparation.
Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. (1995). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1895)
Google Scholar
Lord, C. G. (1997). Social psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Google Scholar
Mantovani, G. (1994). Is computer-mediated communication intrinsically apt to enhance democracy in organizations? Human Relations, 47, 45-62.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Matheson, K. , & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221-233.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Myers, D. (1987). “Anonymity is part of the magic”: Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 251-266.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nunamaker, J. F. , Dennis, A. R. , Valacich, J. S. , & Vogel, D. R. (1991). Information technology for negotiating groups: Generating options for mutual gain. Management Science, 37, 1325-1346.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: Polity.
Google Scholar
Postmes, T. (1997). Social influence in computer-mediated groups. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
Postmes, T. , & Spears, R. (1997, March). Quality of decisions, group norms and social identity: Biased sampling or sampled biases. Paper presented at the Fifth Munster Workshop on the Social Identity Approach, Rothenberge, Germany.
Google Scholar
Postmes, T. , & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Postmes, T. , Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (in press). Social identity, group norms, and “deindividuation”: Lessons from computer-mediated communication for social influence in the group. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears , & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot, D. (1998). Social influence in computer-mediated groups: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Google Scholar
Reicher, S. (1982). The determination of collective behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 41-83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Reicher, S. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner (Ed.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Reicher, S. (1996). “The crowd” century: Reconciling practical success with theoretical failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 535-553.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reicher, S. , & Levine, M. (1994). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reicher, S. , Spears, R. , & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161-198). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Rice, R. E. , & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rojahn, K. (1996). Gender in the context of leadership. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
Sabini, J. (1995). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
Google Scholar
Short, J. A. , Williams, E. , & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Spears, R. (1995). Isolating the collective self. In A. Oosterwegel & R. A. Wicklund (Eds.), The self in European and North American culture: Developments and processes (pp. 309-322). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar
Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Spears, R. , Lea, M. , & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Straus, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-60). London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Google Scholar
Tarde, G. (1921). Les lois de l'imitation [The laws of imitation]. Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan. (Original work published 1890)
Google Scholar
Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2, 230-265.
Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (1996). Parallel lives: Working on identity in virtual space. In D. Grodin & T. R. Lindlof (Eds.), Constructing the self in a mediated world (pp. 156-175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner , M. A. Hogg , P. J. Oakes , S. D. Reicher , & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Valacich, J. S. , Jessup, L. M. , Dennis, A. R. , & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 219-241.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Waldzus, S., Schubert, T., & Frindte, W. (1997). Ingroup-favouritism and ingroup-salience under computer mediated conditions: An extended replication of minimal group results. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186-203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 1-43.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Walther, J. , Anderson, J. F. , & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

CRX-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $264.83

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top