Abstract
This study examined predictors of support for censorship of television violence, including third-person effects (the belief that others are more affected by televised violence than oneself) and exposure to specific news stories about the issue. A random sample of 253 residents in a small, Midwestern metropolitan area participated via telephone interviews. The third-person effect for aggression predicted greater support for censorship, but the third-person effect for mean-world perceptions did not. However, when perceived effects on self and others were examined separately, greater support for censorship was associated with respondents' beliefs that violent content increased others' aggressive tendencies but their own mean-world perceptions. More frequent exposure to news stories about imitation was associated with more willingness to censor violent content, but four other types of news stories were unrelated to censorship support. Interpretations and implications of these and other findings are discussed.
|
Cantor, J.
(1994). Fright reactions to mass media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Cohen, J.
, & Davis, R. G. (1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-688. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Cotton, J. L.
(1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Davison, W. P.
(1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dearing, J. W.
, & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Donnerstein, E.
, Slaby, R. G. , & Eron, L. D. (1994). The mass media and youth aggression. In L. D. Eron , J. H. Gentry , & P. Schlegel (Eds.), Reason to hope: A psychosocial perspective on violence & youth (pp. 219-250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar | |
|
Fisher, R. D.
, Cook, I. J. , & Shirkey, E. C. (1994). Correlates of support for censorship of sexual, sexually violent, and violent media. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 229-240. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L. , Morgan, M. , & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Golebiowska, E. A.
(1995). Individual value priorities, education, and political tolerance. Political Behavior, 17, 23-48. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Green, D. P.
, & Schickler, E. (1993). Multiple-measure assessment of party identification. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 503-535. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gunter, B.
(1991). Responding to news and public affairs. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Gunter, B.
(1994). The question of media violence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 163-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Gunther, A. C.
(1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Gunther, A. C.
(1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27-38. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gunther, A. C.
, & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hoffner, C.
(1998). Framing of the television violence issue in newspaper coverage. In J. T. Hamilton (Ed.), Television violence and public policy (pp. 313-333). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hoffner, C.
, Plotkin, R. S. , Buchanan, M. , Anderson, J. D. , Schneider, S. , Ricciotti, L. A. , Kowalczyk, L. , Silberg, K. , & Pastorek, A. (1997, May). The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada. Google Scholar | |
|
Innes, J. M.
, & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the “third person” effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457-463. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Iyengar, S.
(1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lasorsa, D. L.
(1989). Real and perceived effects of “Amerika.” Journalism Quarterly, 66, 373-378. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lavrakas, P. J.
(1993). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Marshall, T. R.
(1988). Public opinion, representation, and the modern Supreme Court. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 293-316. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
McLeod, D. M.
, Eveland, W. P., Jr. , & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McLeod, J. M.
, Sotirovic, M. , Voakes, P. S. , Guo, Z. , & Huang, K. Y. (1998). A model of public support for First Amendment rights. Communication Law and Policy, 3, 479-515. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mishler, W.
, & Sheehan, R. S. (1993). The Supreme Court as a counter-majoritarian institution? The impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 87, 87-101. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Page, B. I.
, & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175-190. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Paik, H.
, & Comstock, G. (1994). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21, 516-546. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Price, V.
, Tewksbury, D. , & Huang, L. -N. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 3-26. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rojas, H.
, Shah, D. V. , & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rucinski, D.
, & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The “other” as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Salwen, M. B.
(1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Salwen, M. B.
, & Driscoll, P. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O.J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47(2), 60-78. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Samoriski, J.
, Huffman, J. L. , & Trauth, D. M. (1997). The V-chip and cyber cops: Technology vs. regulation. Communication Law and Policy, 2, 143-164. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Saunders, K.
(1996). Violence as obscenity: Limiting the media's first amendment protection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Spitzer, M. L.
(1998). A first glance at the constitutionality of the V-chip rating system. In J. T. Hamilton (Ed.), Television violence and public policy (pp. 335-383). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Thompson, M. E.
, Chaffee, S. H. , & Oshagan, H. H. (1990). Regulating pornography: A public dilemma. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 73-83. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
