Support for Censorship of Television Violence: The Role of the Third-Person Effect and News Exposure

First Published December 1, 1999 Research Article

This study examined predictors of support for censorship of television violence, including third-person effects (the belief that others are more affected by televised violence than oneself) and exposure to specific news stories about the issue. A random sample of 253 residents in a small, Midwestern metropolitan area participated via telephone interviews. The third-person effect for aggression predicted greater support for censorship, but the third-person effect for mean-world perceptions did not. However, when perceived effects on self and others were examined separately, greater support for censorship was associated with respondents' beliefs that violent content increased others' aggressive tendencies but their own mean-world perceptions. More frequent exposure to news stories about imitation was associated with more willingness to censor violent content, but four other types of news stories were unrelated to censorship support. Interpretations and implications of these and other findings are discussed.

Cantor, J. (1994). Fright reactions to mass media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. , & Davis, R. G. (1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-688.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dearing, J. W. , & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Donnerstein, E. , Slaby, R. G. , & Eron, L. D. (1994). The mass media and youth aggression. In L. D. Eron , J. H. Gentry , & P. Schlegel (Eds.), Reason to hope: A psychosocial perspective on violence & youth (pp. 219-250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
Fisher, R. D. , Cook, I. J. , & Shirkey, E. C. (1994). Correlates of support for censorship of sexual, sexually violent, and violent media. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 229-240.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gerbner, G. , Gross, L. , Morgan, M. , & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Golebiowska, E. A. (1995). Individual value priorities, education, and political tolerance. Political Behavior, 17, 23-48.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Green, D. P. , & Schickler, E. (1993). Multiple-measure assessment of party identification. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 503-535.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gunter, B. (1991). Responding to news and public affairs. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Gunter, B. (1994). The question of media violence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 163-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27-38.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gunther, A. C. , & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hoffner, C. (1998). Framing of the television violence issue in newspaper coverage. In J. T. Hamilton (Ed.), Television violence and public policy (pp. 313-333). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Hoffner, C. , Plotkin, R. S. , Buchanan, M. , Anderson, J. D. , Schneider, S. , Ricciotti, L. A. , Kowalczyk, L. , Silberg, K. , & Pastorek, A. (1997, May). The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
Google Scholar
Innes, J. M. , & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the “third person” effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457-463.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Lasorsa, D. L. (1989). Real and perceived effects of “Amerika.” Journalism Quarterly, 66, 373-378.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Lavrakas, P. J. (1993). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Marshall, T. R. (1988). Public opinion, representation, and the modern Supreme Court. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 293-316.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McLeod, D. M. , Eveland, W. P., Jr. , & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
McLeod, J. M. , Sotirovic, M. , Voakes, P. S. , Guo, Z. , & Huang, K. Y. (1998). A model of public support for First Amendment rights. Communication Law and Policy, 3, 479-515.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mishler, W. , & Sheehan, R. S. (1993). The Supreme Court as a counter-majoritarian institution? The impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 87, 87-101.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Page, B. I. , & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175-190.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Paik, H. , & Comstock, G. (1994). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21, 516-546.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Price, V. , Tewksbury, D. , & Huang, L. -N. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 3-26.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rojas, H. , Shah, D. V. , & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rucinski, D. , & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The “other” as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Salwen, M. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Salwen, M. B. , & Driscoll, P. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O.J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47(2), 60-78.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Samoriski, J. , Huffman, J. L. , & Trauth, D. M. (1997). The V-chip and cyber cops: Technology vs. regulation. Communication Law and Policy, 2, 143-164.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Saunders, K. (1996). Violence as obscenity: Limiting the media's first amendment protection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Spitzer, M. L. (1998). A first glance at the constitutionality of the V-chip rating system. In J. T. Hamilton (Ed.), Television violence and public policy (pp. 335-383). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Thompson, M. E. , Chaffee, S. H. , & Oshagan, H. H. (1990). Regulating pornography: A public dilemma. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 73-83.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

CRX-article-ppv for GBP29.00
CRX-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP221.03
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $264.83