Opinion polls show that public support for nuclear power has declined since the Fukushima crisis began, not only in Japan but also in other nations around the world. People oppose nuclear power for a variety of reasons, but the predominant concern is the perception that it is a risky technology. Some communities that are closely associated with it even suffer from stigmatization. The nuclear industry has tried a variety of strategies to break down public resistance to nuclear power—including information campaigns, risk comparisons, and efforts to promote nuclear power as a solution to climate change. None of these strategies has worked well, mostly because the public lacks trust in the nuclear industry. Public resistance to nuclear power is likely to continue, making it difficult to site and build new reactors. This resistance may be a major obstacle to the rapid expansion of nuclear power.

Bickerstaff, K, Lorenzoni, I, Pidgeon, NF, Poortinga, W, Simmons, P (2008) Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 17(2): 145169. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Bolsen, T, Cook, FL (2008) Public opinion on energy policy: 1974–2006. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 364388. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Buffery, V (2011) Majority of French want to drop nuclear energy-poll. Reuters April 13. Available at: http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFLDE73C0ZI20110413. Google Scholar
Burningham, K (2000) Using the language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers. Local Environment 5(1): 5567. Google Scholar, Crossref
Chugoku Newspaper (1992) Exposure: Victims of radiation speak out. Translated by Kirsten Mcivor. Tokyo: Kodansha International. Google Scholar
Cooper, M, Sussman, D (2011) Nuclear power loses support in new poll. New York Times March 22. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/23/us/23poll.html. Google Scholar
Craighill, PM, Cohen, J (2011) Slim majority of Americans see nuclear plants as safe energy sources, poll finds. Washington Post April 20. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/slim-majority-of-americans-see-nuclear-plants-as-safe-energy-sources-poll-finds/2011/04/19/AFRnZG9D_story.html. Google Scholar
EC (2002) Eurobarometer 56.2: Europeans and radioactive waste Brussels . Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_165_en.pdf. Google Scholar
Flynn, J, Slovic, P (1995) Yucca Mountain: A crisis for policy: Prospects for America’s high-level nuclear waste program. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 20(1): 83118. Google Scholar, Crossref
Fowler, J (2011) Public increasingly opposed to HidroAysén, nuclear power—Ipsos—Chile. Business News Americas April 13. Available at: http://news.reportlinker.com/n09604356/Public-increasingly-opposed-to-HidroAysen-nuclear-power-Ipsos.html. Google Scholar
Freudenburg, WR, Pastor, SK (1992) NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the syndromes. Journal of Social Issues 48(4): 3961. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
GlobeScan (2005) Global public opinion on nuclear issues and the IAEA. Final report from 18 countries: London. Available at: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Reports/gponi_report2005.pdf. Google Scholar
Green, J (2011) After Fukushima: Nuclear less popular than ever. Green Left Weekly April 10. Available at: http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/47302. Google Scholar
Greenberg, M (2009) Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data. Energy Policy 37(8): 32423249. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Gregory, R, Flynn, J, Slovic, P (1995) Technological stigma. American Scientist 83(3): 220223. Google Scholar, ISI
Gregory, RS, Satterfield, TA (2002) Beyond perception: The experience of risk and stigma in community contexts. Risk Analysis 22(2): 347358. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Heiman, M (1990) From ‘Not in My Backyard!’ to ‘Not in Anybody’s Backyard!’. Journal of the American Planning Association 56(3): 359362. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Ito, S (2011) Nuclear stigma adds to Japan's pain. Agence France-Presse May 12. Available at: http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Nuclear_stigma_adds_to_Japans_pain_999.html. Google Scholar
Johnson, RJ, Scicchitano, MJ (2000) Uncertainty, risk, trust, and information: Public perceptions of environmental issues and willingness to take action. Policy Studies Journal 28(3): 633647. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Kraft, ME, Clary, BB (1991) Citizen participation and the nimby syndrome: Public response to radioactive waste disposal. Western Political Quarterly 44(2): 299328. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals
Kyodo News (2011) 60–70% of public backs higher taxes for disaster recovery: Media polls. Japan Today April 10. Available at: http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/60-70-of-public-backs-higher-taxes-for-disaster-recovery-media-polls. Google Scholar
Levi, DJ, Holder, EE (1988) Psychological factors in the nuclear power controversy. Political Psychology 9(3): 445457. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
McNeill, D (2011) Fukushima village on way to becoming ghost town. The Japan Times May 13. Available at: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110513f1.html. Google Scholar
NRC (2011) NRC in communication with Japanese regulators. NRC News March 12. Available at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-044.pdf. Google Scholar
Onishi, N, Belson, K (2011) Culture of complicity tied to stricken nuclear plant. New York Times April 26. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/world/asia/27collusion.html. Google Scholar
OTA (1984) Nuclear Power in an Age of Uncertainty Washington, DC . Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, OTA-E-216. Available at: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ota/Ota_4/DATA/1984/8421.PDF. Google Scholar
Pidgeon, NF, Lorenzoni, I, Poortinga, W (2008) Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 18(1): 6985. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Poortinga, W, Pidgeon, NF (2004) Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Analysis 24(6): 14751486. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Rosa, EA, Dunlap, RE (1994) Nuclear power: Three decades of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 58(2): 295324. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Shivakumar, C (2008) Kalpakkam's forgotten people have a tale to tell. Indian Express October 20. Available at: http://www.sacw.net/article134.html. Google Scholar
Slovic, P (1993) Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6): 675682. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Slovic, P (1994) Perception of risk and the future of nuclear power. Physics and Society 23(1 Available at: http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/1994/january/ajan94.html. Google Scholar
Slovic, P (1996) Perception of risk from radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68(3/4): 165180. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Slovic, P, Fischhoff, B, Lichtenstein, S (1982) Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis 2(2): 8393. Google Scholar, Crossref
Slovic, P, Flynn, J, Layman, M (1991) Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 254(5038): 16031607. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Stoett, P (2003) Toward renewed legitimacy? Nuclear power, global warming, and security. Global Environmental Politics 3(1): 99116. Google Scholar, Crossref
Tuler S and Kasperson R (2010) Social distrust: Implications and recommendations for spent fuel and high level radioacitve waste management. Available at: http://brc.gov/library/commissioned_papers/BRC.Social_Trust.17Feb11.pdf. Google Scholar
Unistar (2011) Issue briefs. Available at: http://www.unistarnuclear.com/IB_home.html (accessed 18 May 2011). Google Scholar
Van der Zee, B (2011) Japan nuclear crisis puts UK public off new power stations. Guardian March 22. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/22/japan-nuclear-crisis-uk-power-stations. Google Scholar
Wald, M (2011) Disaster plan problems found at U.S. nuclear plants. New York Times May 12. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/13/business/energy-environment/13nuke.html. Google Scholar
Wallace, R (2011) Japan wants to keep N-power. The Australian April 5. Available at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/japan-wants-to-keep-n-power/story-e6frg6so-1226033592631. Google Scholar
Weinberg, AM (1976) The maturity and future of nuclear energy. American Scientist 64: 1621. Google Scholar, ISI
Whitfield, SC, Rosa, EA, Dan, A, Dietz, T (2009) The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis 29(3): 425437. Google Scholar, Crossref, Medline, ISI
Wolsink, M (2006) Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31(1): 8591. Google Scholar, Crossref, ISI
Yamada, T (2011) Public split on nuclear energy, but long-time warning deserves serious debate. The Mainichi Daily News April 26. Available at: http://mdn.mainichi.jp/perspectives/column/archive/news/2011/04/20110426p2a00m0na001000c.html. Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Article

Your Access Options


Purchase

BOS-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in: