Two studies examined hypotheses derived from a Social Identity model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE) as applied to social influence in computer-mediated communication (CMC) in groups. This model predicts that anonymity can increase social influence if a common group identity is salient. In a first study, group members were primed with a certain type of social behavior (efficiency vs. prosocial norms). Consistent with the model, anonymous groups displayed prime-consistent behavior in their task solutions, whereas identifiable groups did not. This suggests that the primed norm took root in anonymous groups to a greater extent than in identifiable groups. A second study replicated this effect and showed that nonprimed group members conformed to the behavior of primed members, but only when anonymous, suggesting that the primed norm was socially transmitted within the group. Implications for social influence in small groups are discussed.

Abrams, D. , Wetherell, M. S. , Cochrane, S. , Hogg, M. A. , & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what you think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Allport, G. W. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-46). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. , Chen, M. , & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233.
Google Scholar | ISI
Davis, D. , & Brock, T. C. (1975). Use of first-person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 381-388.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
Google Scholar
Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Doosje, B. , Spears, R. , & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn’t all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
Google Scholar
French, J. R. P. , & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Google Scholar
Haslam, A. (1997). Stereotyping and social influence: The foundations of stereotype consensus. In R. Spears , P. J. Oakes , N. Ellemers , & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 119-143). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Hyman, H. (1942). The social psychology of status. Archives of Psychology, 38 (Whole No. 269), 94.
Google Scholar
Kiesler, S. , Siegel, J. , & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (G. Weiss Lewin , Ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Original work published 1948)
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lott, A. J. , & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Matheson, K. , & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me [Special issue: Computing: Social and policy issues]. Social Science Computer Review, 8, 1-12.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McKenna, K. Y. A. , & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McLeod, P. L. , Baron, R. S. , Marti, M. W. , & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Postmes, T. , & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Postmes, T. , Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Postmes, T. , Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1999). Inter-group differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Google Scholar
Postmes, T. , Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Postmes, T. , Spears, R. , & Cihangir (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Prentice-Dunn, S. , & Rogers, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 86-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner , M. A. Hogg , P. J. Oakes , S. D. Reicher , & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D. , Spears, R. , & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 6 (pp. 161-198). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rutter, D. R. (1984). Looking and seeing: The role of visual communication in social interaction. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 187, 1-60.
Google Scholar
Short, J. A. , Williams, E. , & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar
Spears, R. , Lea, M. , & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1987). The analysis of social influence. In J. C. Turner , M. A. Hogg , P. J. Oakes , S. D. Reicher , & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

PSP-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $236.33

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top