Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption

First Published October 6, 2011 Research Article Find in PubMed

Authors

1
 
The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
by this author
, 2
 
University of Kent, Kent, UK
by this author
, 3
 
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
by this author
,
1
 
The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
by this author
...
First Published Online: October 6, 2011

Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds. The current three studies show that this dissonance motivates people to deny minds to animals. Study 1 demonstrates that animals considered appropriate for human consumption are ascribed diminished mental capacities. Study 2 shows that meat eaters are motivated to deny minds to food animals when they are reminded of the link between meat and animal suffering. Finally, Study 3 provides direct support for our dissonance hypothesis, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial. Moreover, this mind denial in turn reduces negative affect associated with dissonance. The findings highlight the role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments.

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bastian, B., Laham, S., Wilson, S., Haslam, N., Koval, P. (2011). Blaming, praising and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 469-483
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Beardsworth, A., Keil, T. (1992). The vegetarian option: Varieties, conversions, motives and careers. Sociological Review, 40, 253-293.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Beardsworth, A., Keil, T. (1997). Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Berndsen, M., van der Pligt, J. (2004). Ambivalence towards meat. Appetite, 42, 71-78.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Berndsen, M., van der Pligt, J. (2005). Risks of meat: The relative impact of cognitive, affective, and moral concerns. Appetite, 44, 195-205.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bilewicz, M., Imhoff, R., Drogosz, M. (2011). The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 201-209.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., Bastian, B. (2011). The effect of food categorization on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57, 193-196.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Castano, E., Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804-818.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Cuddy, A. J. C., Rock, M. S., Norton, M. I. (2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 107-118.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Diener, E., Emmons, R. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Epley, N., Waytz, A. (2009). Mind perception. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., Lindsay, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498-541). New York, NY: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143-155.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Fiddes, N. (1991). Meat: A natural symbol. London, UK: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Foer, J. S. (2009). Eating animals. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
Google Scholar
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619-621.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gray, K., Wegner, D. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, B. R., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490-1501.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C. (2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711-723.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 38, 7-16.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., Fearn, M., Sigelman, J. D., Johnson, P. (2008). Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: Tests of the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1-15.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Harmon-Jones, E., Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Haslam, N., Kashima, Y., Loughnan, S., Shi, J., Suitner, C. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26, 248-258.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hoogland, C., de Boer, J., Boersema, J. (2005). Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history. Appetite, 45, 15-23.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kiesler, C. A., Pallak, M. S. (1976). Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1014-1025.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kozak, M., Marsh, A., Wegner, D. (2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543-555.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Laham, S. (2009). Expanding the moral circle: Inclusion and exclusion mindsets and the circle of moral regard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 250-253.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Bastian, B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55, 156-159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709-717.
Google Scholar | ISI
Mameli, M., Bortolotti, L. (2006). Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 84-89.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Marcu, A., Lyons, E., Hegarty, P. (2007). Dilemmatic human-animal boundaries in Britain and Romania: Post-materialist and materialist dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 875-893.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Morewedge, C. K., Preston, J., Wegner, D. M. (2007). Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1-11.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157-166.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Penn, D. C., Povinelli, D. J. (2007). Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: A comparative, critical review. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 97-118.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Plous, S. (2003). Is there such a thing as prejudice towards animals? In Plous, S. (Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination (pp. 509-528). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Preacher, K., Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Regan, T. (1997). The rights of humans and other animals. Ethics and Behavior, 7, 103-111.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Rozin, P. (1996). Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 18-24.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rozin, P. (2004). Meat. In Katz, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of food (pp. 666-671). New York, NY: Scribner.
Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., Stoess, C. (1997). Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science, 8, 67-73.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ryder, R. (1971). Experiments on animals. In Godlovitch, S., Godlovitch, R., Harris, J. (Eds.), Animals, men and morals (pp. 41-82). New York, NY: Taplinger.
Google Scholar
Sapontzis, S. F. (1981). A critique of personhood. Ethics, 91, 607-618.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., Whiten, A. (2001). Mental evolution and development: Evidence for secondary representation in children, great apes and other animals. Psychological Bulletin, 5, 629-650.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Vialles, N. (1994). Animal to edible (Underwood, J. A. , Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 383-388.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Wennberg, R. N. (2003). God, humans, and animals: An invitation to enlarge our moral universe. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Google Scholar
Zanna, M. P., Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 703-709.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

PSP-article-ppv for GBP29.00
PSP-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP184.34
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $236.33