Do Men and Women Show Love Differently in Marriage?

First Published June 18, 2012 Research Article Find in PubMed

Authors

1
 
The University of Texas at Austin, USA
by this author
, 1
 
The University of Texas at Austin, USA
by this author
, 1
 
The University of Texas at Austin, USA
by this author
First Published Online: June 18, 2012

In Western societies, women are considered more adept than men at expressing love in romantic relationships. Although scholars have argued that this view of love gives short shrift to men’s ways of showing love (e.g., Cancian, 1986; Noller, 1996), the widely embraced premise that men and women “love differently” has rarely been examined empirically. Using data collected at four time points over 13 years of marriage, the authors examined whether love is associated with different behaviors for husbands and wives. Multilevel analyses revealed that, counter to theoretical expectations, both genders were equally likely to show love through affection. But whereas wives expressed love by enacting fewer negative or antagonistic behaviors, husbands showed love by initiating sex, sharing leisure activities, and doing household work together with their wives. Overall, the findings indicate that men and women show their love in more nuanced ways than cultural stereotypes suggest.

Alexander, M. G., Wood, W. (2000). Women, men, and positive emotions: A social role interpretation. In Fischer, A. H. (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychology perspectives (pp. 189-210). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Norman, C. C., McKenna, C., Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273-284.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242-273.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Braiker, H. B., Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In Burgess, R. L., Huston, T. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135-168). New York, NY: Academic.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brantley, A., Knox, D., Zusman, M. E. (2002). When and why gender differences in saying “I Love You” among college students. College Student Journal, 36, 614-615.
Google Scholar
Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). Love acts: The evolutionary biology of love. In Stemberg, R. J., Barnes, M. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 100-118). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2006). Strategies of human mating. Psychological Topics, 15, 239-260.
Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Cancian, F. M. (1986). The feminization of love. Signs, 11, 692-709.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cancian, F. M. (1994). Marital conflict over intimacy. In Handel, G., Whitchurch, G. G. (Eds.), The psychosocial interior of the family (4th ed., pp. 401-418). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., Huston, T. L. (2006). The affective structure of marriage. In Vangelisti, A. L., Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 131-155). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Claxton, A., Perry-Jenkins, M. (2008). No fun anymore: Leisure and marital quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 28-43.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473-490.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Crawford, D. W., Huston, T. L. (1993). The impact of the transition to parenthood on marital leisure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 39-46.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dion, K. K., Dion, K. L. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5-17.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Elliott, S., Umberson, D. (2008). The performance of desire: Gender and sexual negotiation in long-term marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 391-406.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ewart, C. K., Taylor, C. B., Kraemer, H. C., Agras, W. S. (1991). High blood pressure and marital discord: Not being nasty matters more than being nice. Health Psychology, 10, 155-163.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 265-284.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fehr, B. (2006). A prototype approach to studying love. In Sternberg, R. J., Weis, K. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 225-246). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Fehr, B., Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425-438.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Google Scholar
Frazier, P. A., Esterly, E. (1990). Correlates of relationship beliefs: Gender, relationship experience and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 331-352.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gaelick, L., Bodenhausen, G. V, Wyer, R. S. (1985). Emotional communication in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1246-1265.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gareis, E., Wilkins, R. (2011). Love expression in the United States and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 307-319.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247-262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L. (1993). Love, sex, and intimacy: Their psychology, biology, and history. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar
Helgeson, V. S., Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173-183.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C. (2002). Linking romantic love with sex: Development of the Perceptions of Love and Sex Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 361-378.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Huic, A., Kamenov, Z., Jugovic, I., Bredow, C. A., Schoenfeld, E. A., Huston, T.L. (2011, January). Is the expression of love feminized? A test and extension of Cancian’s hypothesis. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Huston, T. L., Robins, E., Atkinson, J., McHale, S. (1987). Surveying the landscape of marital behavior: A behavioral self-report approach to studying marriage. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Family processes and problems: Social psychological aspects (pp. 45-71). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Huston, T. L., Vangelisti, A. L. (1991). Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 721-733.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Johnson, E., Huston, T. L. (1998). The perils of love, or why wives adapt to husbands during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 195-204.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kline, S. L., Horton, B., Zhang, S. (2008). Communicating love: Comparisons between American and East Asian university students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 200-214.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Klusmann, D. (2002). Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 275-287.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Marston, P. J., Hecht, M. L. (1994). Love ways: An elaboration and application to relational maintenance. In Canary, D. J., Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 187-202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
McNelles, L. R., Connolly, J. A. (1999). Intimacy between adolescent friends: Age and gender differences in intimate affect and intimate behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 143-159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Neff, L. A., Karney, B. R. (2009). Compassionate love in early marriage. In Fehr, B., Sprecher, S., Underwood, L. G. (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 201-222). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Noller, P. (1996). What is this thing called love? Defining the love that supports marriage and family. Personal Relationships, 3, 97-115.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Noller, P., Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Marital communication in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 832-843.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Peetz, J., Kammrath, L. (2011). Only because I love you: Why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 887-904.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Perrin, P. B., Heesacker, M., Tiegs, T. J., Swan, L. K., Lawrence, A. W., Smith, M. B., . . .Mejia-Millan, C. M. (2011). Aligning Mars and Venus: The social construction and instability of gender differences in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 64, 613-628.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450-461.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Radmacher, K., Azmitia, M. (2006). Are there gendered pathways to intimacy in early adolescents’ and emerging adults’ friendships? Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 415-448.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rook, K. S. (2001). Emotional health and positive versus negative social exchanges: A daily diary analysis. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 86-97.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rubin, L. B. (1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Youn, G., Bond, B., Brooks, S., Frye, H., Johnson, S., Stoka, C. (2009). When will I feel love? The effects of culture, personality, and gender on the psychological tendency to love. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 830-846.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spence, J. T., Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sprecher, S., Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629-651.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sprecher, S., Metts, S. (1999). Romantic beliefs: Their influence on relationships and patterns of change over time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 834-851.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sprecher, S., Sedikides, C. (1993). Gender differences in perceptions of emotionality: The case of close heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 28, 511-530.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sprecher, S., Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of Earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 46, 131-147.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy in men’s friendships: Closeness in men’s friendships. In Risman, B. J., Schwartz, P. (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach (pp. 71-86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Swensen, C. H. (1972). The behaviors of love. In Otto, A. (Ed.), Love today (pp. 86-101). New York, NY: Association Press.
Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: William Morrow.
Google Scholar
Thompson, L., Walker, A. J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 889-900.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wade, T. J., Auer, G., Roth, T. M. (2009). What is love: Further investigation of love acts. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3, 290-304.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Weigel, D. J., Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (1999). How couples maintain marriages: A closer look at self and spouse influences upon the use of maintenance behaviors in marriage. Family Relations, 48, 263-269.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wills, T. A., Weiss, R. L., Patterson, G. R. (1974). A behavioral analysis of the determinants of marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 802-811.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Wood, J. T. (2002). A critical response to John Gray’s Mars and Venus portrayals of men and women. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 201-210.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wood, J. T., Inman, C. C. (1993). In a different mode: Masculine styles of communicating closeness. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 279-295.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wood, W., Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

PSP-article-ppv for GBP29.00
PSP-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP184.34
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $236.33