As entrepreneurship research has matured, scholars have increasingly recognized that the formation of new ventures is commonly accomplished by teams as opposed to lone entrepreneurs. Over the past two decades, the upper echelons perspective has served as the primary lens for investigating new venture team functioning and performance. However, researchers have begun to move beyond the relationship between team characteristics and team outcomes, to explore intermediary mechanisms that more precisely explain how team inputs lead to team effectiveness. In this article we apply an inputs-mediators-outcomes framework, which has served as a foundation for teams research in organizational behavior over the past 50 years, to first organize and review prior work on new venture teams, and then to provide a roadmap for future research. By integrating the upper echelons approach from strategic management with the inputs-mediators-outcomes framework from organizational behavior, we clarify what is known about new venture teams and shed light on important issues that could help the field of entrepreneurship to develop a more comprehensive understanding of why some new venture teams, but not others, achieve successful outcomes.

Aldrich, H. E., Kim, P. H. 2007. Small worlds, infinite possibilities? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 147-165.
Google Scholar | ISI
Alvarez, S. A., Busenitz, L. W. 2001. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27: 755-775.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Amason, A. C., Shrader, R. C., Tompson, G. H. 2006. Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 125-148.
Google Scholar | ISI
Azen, R., Budescu, D. V. 2003. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8: 129-148.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Baker, T., Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Research construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329-366.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 1-26.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Barney, J. B., Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., Moesel, D. D. 1996. New venture teams’ assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11: 257-272.
Google Scholar | ISI
Baron, R. A. 2006. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1): 104-119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Baron, R. A. 2007. Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 167-182.
Google Scholar | ISI
Baron, R. A., Hmieleski, K. M., Henry, R. A. 2012. Entrepreneurs’ dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits—and potential costs—of being “up.” Journal of Business Venturing, 27: 310-324.
Google Scholar | ISI
Baron, R. A., Shane, S. A. 2005. Entrepreneurship: A process perspective. Mason, OH: South-Western.
Google Scholar
Baron, R. A., Tang, J. 2009. Entrepreneurs’ social competence and new venture performance: Evidence on potential mediators and cross-industry generality. Journal of Management, 35: 282-306.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Baron, R. A., Tang, J., Hmieleski, K. M. 2011. The downside of being “up”: Entrepreneurs’ dispositional affect and firm performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5: 101-119.
Google Scholar | ISI
Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Colbert, A. E. 2007. The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 544-557.
Google Scholar | ISI
Barsade, S. G., Gibson, D. E. 2007. Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1): 36-59.
Google Scholar | ISI
Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., Kirkpatrick, S. A. 1998. A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 43-54.
Google Scholar | ISI
Baum, J. R., Wally, S. 2003. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1107-1129.
Google Scholar | ISI
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., McLendon, C. L. 2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 989-1004.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Beckman, C. M. 2006. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 741-758.
Google Scholar | ISI
Beckman, C. M., Burton, M. D. 2008. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19: 3-24.
Google Scholar | ISI
Beckman, C. M., Burton, M. D., O’Reilly, C. 2007. Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 147-173.
Google Scholar | ISI
Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., Trochim, W. M. K. 2008. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 170-188.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Blatt, R. 2009. Tough love: How communal schemas and contracting practices build relational capital in entrepreneurial teams. Academy of Management Review, 34: 533-551.
Google Scholar | ISI
Boeker, W. 1997. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 213-236.
Google Scholar | ISI
Boeker, W., Karichalil, R. 2002. Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 818-826.
Google Scholar | ISI
Boeker, W., Wiltbank, R. 2005. New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organization Science, 16: 123-133.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bourgeois, L. J., Eisenhardt, K. M. 1988. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34: 816-835.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., Brown, K. G. 2013. Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 385-392.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., Brown, K. G. 2012. Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 151-158.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Brinckmann, J., Hoegl, M. 2011. Effects of initial teamwork capability and initial relational capability on the development of new technology-based firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5: 37-57.
Google Scholar | ISI
Brinckmann, J., Salomo, S., Gemuenden, H. G. 2011. Financial management competence of founding teams and growth of new technology-based firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 217-243.
Google Scholar | ISI
Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., Stüber, H. 2012. The selectiveness of the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Small Business Management, 50: 105-131.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., Clarysse, B. 2010. Learning from experience and learning from others: How congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4: 164-182.
Google Scholar | ISI
Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., Moesel, D. D. 2004. Reconsidering the venture capitalists’ “value added” proposition: An interorganizational learning perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 787-807.
Google Scholar | ISI
Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., Moesel, D. D. 2005. Signaling in venture capitalist-new venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long-term venture outcomes? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29: 1-12.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Busenitz, L. W., Moesel, D. D., Fiet, J. O., Barney, J. B. 1997. The framing of perceptions of fairness in the relationship between venture capitalists and new venture teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21: 5-21.
Google Scholar | Abstract
Carland, J. C., Carland, J. W. 2012. A model of shared entrepreneurial leadership. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 18: 71-81.
Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., Sanders, W. G. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30: 749-778.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Chaganti, R. S., Watts, A. D., Chaganti, R., Zimmerman-Treichel, M. 2008. Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: Effects on prospector strategy and performance in new Internet ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 113-139.
Google Scholar | ISI
Chandler, G. N., Honig, B., Wiklund, J. 2005. Antecedents, moderators, and performance consequences of membership change in NVTMTs. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 705-725.
Google Scholar | ISI
Chowdhury, S. 2005. Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important? Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 727-746.
Google Scholar | ISI
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F., Wu, Z. 2011. Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26: 472-488.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ciavarella, M. A., Buchholtz, A. K., Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., Stokes, G. S. 2004. The Big Five and venture survival: Is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 465-483.
Google Scholar | ISI
Clarysse, B., Moray, N. 2004. A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 55-79.
Google Scholar | ISI
Cohen, B., Smith, B., Mitchell, R. 2008. Toward a sustainable conceptualization of dependent variables in entrepreneurship research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17: 107-119.
Google Scholar
Cole, M. S., Walter, F., Bruch, H. 2008. Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 945-958.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Cooney, T. M. 2005. What is an entrepreneurial team? International Small Business Journal, 23: 226-235.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cooper, A. C., Artz, K. W. 1995. Determinants of satisfaction for entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 439-457.
Google Scholar | ISI
Cooper, A. C., Woo, C. Y., Dunkelberg, W. C. 1989. Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 317-332.
Google Scholar | ISI
de Meza, D., Southey, C. 1996. The borrower’s curse: Optimism, finance and entrepreneurship. Economic Journal, 106: 375-386.
Google Scholar | ISI
de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L., Jehn, K. A. 2012. The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 360-390.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Edmondson, A. C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Eisenhardt, K. M., Schoonhoven, C. B. 1990. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 504-529.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M. 2005. A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent startups. Research Policy, 34: 1091-1105.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., Pearce, C. L. 2006. The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 217-231.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ensley, M. D., Pearce, C. L. 2001. Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 145-160.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., Amason, A. C. 2002. Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 365-386.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., Pearce, C. L. 2003. Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13: 329-346.
Google Scholar
Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., O’Neill, H. M. 2012. The genesis of strategy in new ventures: Escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 427-447.
Google Scholar | ISI
Fiet, J. O., Busenitz, L. W., Moesel, D. D., Barney, J. B. 1997. Complementary theoretical perspectives on the dismissal of new venture team members. Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 347-366.
Google Scholar | ISI
Foo, M. D., Sin, H. P., Yiong, L. P. 2006. Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 389-399.
Google Scholar | ISI
Forbes, D. P., Borchert, P. S., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Sapienza, J. J. 2006. Entrepreneurial team formation: An exploration of new member addition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 225-248.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., Henkel, J. 2006. What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of startup teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 802-826.
Google Scholar | ISI
Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., Henkel, J. 2008. Venture capitalists’ evaluations of startup teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32: 459-483.
Google Scholar | ISI
Gimeno, J., Folta, T., Cooper, A., Woo, C. 1997. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 750-783.
Google Scholar | ISI
Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., Beaubien, J. M. 2002. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 819-832.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Hackman, J. R. 2012. From cause to conditions in group research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 428-444.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32: 334-343.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hambrick, D. C., Abrahamson, E. 1995. Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1427-1441.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., Chen, M. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 659-684.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hayward, M. L. A., Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G. 2004. Believing one’s own press: The cause and consequence of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 637-653.
Google Scholar | ISI
Higashide, H., Birley, S. 2002. The consequences of conflict between the venture capitalist and the entrepreneurial team in the United Kingdom from the perspective of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 59-81.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hindle, K. 2004. Choosing qualitative methods for entrepreneurial cognition research: A canonical development approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 575-607.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hmieleski, K. M., Baron, R. A. 2009. Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 473-488.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hmieleski, K. M., Cole, M. S., Baron, R. A. 2012. Shared authentic leadership and new venture performance. Journal of Management, 38: 1476-1499.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hmieleski, K. M., Corbett, A. C. 2008. The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction. Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 482-496.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hmieleski, K. M., Ensley, M. D. 2007. A contextual examination of new venture performance: Entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 865-889.
Google Scholar | ISI
Iacobucci, D., Rosa, P. 2010. The growth of business groups by habitual entrepreneurs: The role of entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34: 351-377.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., Jundt, D. 2005. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 517-543.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.
Google Scholar | ISI
Jehn, K. A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 530-557.
Google Scholar | ISI
Johns, G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 32: 386-408.
Google Scholar | ISI
Johnson, V. 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113: 97-127.
Google Scholar | ISI
Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., Nurick, A. J. 1990. Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14: 7-17.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kimberly, J. R. 1981. The life cycle analogy and the study of organizations: Introduction. In Kimberly, J. R., Miles, R. H. (Eds.), The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations: 1-17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 58-74.
Google Scholar | ISI
Klein, K. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 211-236.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Klimoski, R., Mohammed, S. 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20: 403-437.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., Clarysse, B. 2011. The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: The case of science-based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 777-803.
Google Scholar | ISI
Kor, Y. Y. 2003. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science, 14: 707-719.
Google Scholar | ISI
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Ilgen, D. R. 2006. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7: 77-124.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., Le, S. A. 2007. The impact of board composition and top management team ownership on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1198-1216.
Google Scholar | ISI
Lechler, T. 2001. Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16: 263-278.
Google Scholar | ISI
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., Saul, J. R. 2008. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61: 273-307.
Google Scholar | ISI
Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., Cannella, A. A. 2006. Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 44: 1-26.
Google Scholar | ISI
Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., Korsgaard, M. A. 2002. The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 352-368.
Google Scholar | ISI
Levie, J., Lichtenstein, B. B. 2010. A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34: 317-350.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., Avolio, B. J. 2007. Psychological capital: Developing human competitive advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.
Google Scholar | ISI
Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., Gilson, L. 2008. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34: 410-476.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
McGee, J. E., Dowling, M. J., Megginson, W. L. 1995. Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of business strategy and management experience. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 565-580.
Google Scholar | ISI
McGrath, J. E. 1964. Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Google Scholar
Mischel, W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation. In Magnusson, D., Endler, N. S. (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology: 333-352. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Mullen, B., Copper, C. 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115: 210-227.
Google Scholar | ISI
Mullins, J. 2010. The new business road test: What entrepreneurs and executives should do before writing a business plan. New York: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Nelson, T. 2003. The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 707-724.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ozgen, E., Baron, R. 2007. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 174-192.
Google Scholar | ISI
Pearce, C. L., Sims, H. P. 2002. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6: 172-197.
Google Scholar | ISI
Perry-Smith, J. E., Coff, R. W. 2011. In the mood for entrepreneurial creativity? How optimal group affect differs for generating and selecting ideas for new ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5: 247-268.
Google Scholar | ISI
Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1-24.
Google Scholar | ISI
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., Hayes, A. F. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42: 185-227.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Priem, R. L., Lyon, D. W., Dess, G. G. 1999. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25: 935-953.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rauch, A., Frese, M. 2007. Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16: 353-385.
Google Scholar | ISI
Reynolds, P. D., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., Cox, L. W., Hay, M. 2002. Global entrepreneurship monitor. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
Google Scholar
Reynolds, P., White, P. 1997. The entrepreneurial process: Economic growth, men, women and minorities. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Google Scholar
Sanders, W. G., Carpenter, M. A. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top management team compensation, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 158-178.
Google Scholar | ISI
Sardana, D., Scott-Kemmis, D. 2010. Who learns what? A study based on entrepreneurs from biotechnology new ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 48: 441-468.
Google Scholar | ISI
Schein, E. H. 2002. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 83: 13-28.
Google Scholar
Shrader, R., Siegel, D. S. 2007. Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31: 893-908.
Google Scholar | ISI
Sine, W. D., Mitsuhashi, H., Kirsch, D. A. 2006. Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 121-132.
Google Scholar | ISI
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., Scully, J. A. 1994. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 412-438.
Google Scholar | ISI
Souitaris, V., Maestro, B. M. M. 2010. Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 652-678.
Google Scholar | ISI
Stam, W., Elfring, T. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 97-111.
Google Scholar | ISI
Staw, B. M. 1991. Dressing up like an organization: When psychological theories can explain organizational action. Journal of Management, 17: 805-819.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M., Busenitz, L. W. 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27: 77-94.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ucbasaran, D., Lockett, A., Wright, M., Westhead, P. 2003. Entrepreneurial founder teams: Factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 107-127.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., Rosenbusch, N. 2011. Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26: 341-358.
Google Scholar | ISI
Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., S’Jegers, R. 2006. Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: An examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 249-271.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Vissa, B., Chacar, A. S. 2009. Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1179-1191.
Google Scholar | ISI
Weiss, H. M., Cropanzano, R. 1996. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18: 1-74.
Google Scholar | ISI
West, G. P. 2007. Collective cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31: 77-102.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 925-950.
Google Scholar | ISI
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E. 2006. The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 259-271.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Zolin, R., Kuckertz, A., Kautonen, T. 2011. Human resource flexibility and strong ties in entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Research, 64: 1097-1103.
Google Scholar | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOM-article-ppv for $36.00
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $284.88

Article available in:

Related Articles